1  2  Next

Have you heard about this Hate-F*** List Playboy came out with?

Unless you're brave enough to enter the right wing blogosphere, most likely not.

Basically it's a list of Conservative women the Playboy writer would like to Hate F***.

As the story develops it turns out the liberal media is starting to think it may be crossing the line in revealing this ugly streak of Liberal chauvinism, if not outright hate against uppity Conservative females who dare to speak their minds.

Two reporters have been fired from the liberal press for daring to publicize the story. This One, and Tommy Christopher

Poor little Michelle Malkin, and Elizabeth Hasselback. I would give them such gentle, respectful, winin/dinin, Conservative, lovin.

   

Wow. Look at that. Just when you think the wacky left couldn't come up with something more insulting and sexist than Letterman, they out do themselves again. Where's the feminists on this one? Where's the compassionate, open minded people here?

Unbelievable.

   

Seriously man, what's with this freaky, infatuation, fantasy Liberals seem to be having lately with raping Conservative girls, or women? Statutory or other.

   

You were expecting class and good taste from Playboy? Granted, it's not like Hustler, but still....

   

The more I mull this over, I think I'm starting to get it. It's a veiled threat. It's kind of like "back in the kitchen bitch, or I loosen the belt".

Elizabeth Hasselback is my new hero. She sits there with perfect posture, outnumbered, outgunned, politely giving her opinion, in the unshakable belief it's a free country, stubbornly ignoring all recent evidence to the contrary).

I like Michelle Malkin's eye of the tiger approach too. Don't hold your breath waiting for that one to shut up Liberal-haters-of-Gyno.

God, did you see how that Playboy guy went after the poor little Jewish girl. I don't know who she is, but man, does he hate her.

   

Contrary to some might say,

People buy Playboy for the pictures and not the articles.

   

I say...more and more Liberal media is illustrating a hypocritical desire to shut women up.

You say...

   

And you're proof of that is.....?

If that were true, then Hasselbackwould have been eaten by Rosie o'Donnell years ago.

But let's face it, some of the women on that list do need to STFU. Malkin and Bachman especially.

On another matter though, I'm somewhat surprised Ann Coulter isn't on the list. But then I guess Playboy isn't a tranny porn mag. Plus, i had a great video lined up as well:

   

And I say they have as much right to express an opinion as you do.

With Michelle though, it isn't so much her opinions I admire (although they're quite often spot-on). What I like about her is all the genuinely cool stories she breaks which would otherwise be ignored. Also, she's such a pit bull as an investigative reporter. She gets in there, and roots out details others miss, or in the case of the left wing media try to push under the rug.

But yeah, I get why some wouldn't like that.

   

I've known about this for a while. It's vulgar and foul and wrong, but life goes on, and the disgusting people who come up with this sort of garbage have no credibility anyway. I am content to let these pigs wallow in their own filth. It is not like you could actually sensibly debate them anyway.

   

Is Elisabeth Hasselback the broad from Survivor? And she represents whom, exactly?

   

The same comment goes for the people that read and agree with it.

   

Just in case people think this liberal phenomena of sex-bashing Conservative women is a single event restrictive to that one Playboy article, it's not. It's spreading. I can give you an example.

Katharine Hamm is on the list. You know who she is, right? She's the cutie in this classic hoot of a vid.



OK, but now my point. Go to this old vid on YouTube where she actually has the nerve to express non-liberal opinions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QsreRDE ... re=related

Now search down the comments for the one by 09AUTUMNUS22. I'm not saying YouTube comments are representative of all liberals, or even claiming this particular kid is a liberal. I'm saying when you start to look for this technique of marginalizing a woman's opinion with "here's how I'd do her" comments, it's there. I haven't even mentioned Sarah Palin yet.

   

So you posted something which you admit undercuts your position? Youtube comments aren't representative of anything except of those among us with less than 2 working braincells.

   

And my point is that's where this kind of thing goes. It's authorized by the MSM then, boom, before you can say MJ's a hero (so what if he's a pedophile), the baby neo-comms being led around by the big O nose rings are jumping aboard. And it isn't just YouTube comments. It's all over the place. C'mon admit it. You've seen this same kind of thing in message board Sarah Palin discussions.

I don't think I've ever seen it when the subject of Janeane Gareofalo comes up, but maybe once or twice when Hilary was going face to face with The One.

   

1  2  Next