We need a Hillary thread.
Previous 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 20 Next
BeaverFever @ Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:20 pm
martin14 martin14:
Now Hillary compares Trump to Erdogan in speech at Britain's Oxford University - and launches ANOTHER attack on the electoral college
Clinton compared Trump to the president of Turkey - a controversial figure who returned to office with broad new powers that lack checks and balances
She fretted people 'underestimate the threat' leaders like Trump and Recep Tayyip Erdogan 'pose to the survival of democratic institutions'
She also bemoaned the American electoral system, noting her 'personal experience with winning three million more votes but still losing'
Clinton was at Oxford Monday to deliver the annual Romanes Lecture
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... llege.html
Private citizen makes another speech, complains about Electoral College
in a FPTP country.
Clinton compared Trump to the president of Turkey - a controversial figure who returned to office with broad new powers that lack checks and balances
She fretted people 'underestimate the threat' leaders like Trump and Recep Tayyip Erdogan 'pose to the survival of democratic institutions'
She also bemoaned the American electoral system, noting her 'personal experience with winning three million more votes but still losing'
Clinton was at Oxford Monday to deliver the annual Romanes Lecture
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... llege.html
Private citizen makes another speech, complains about Electoral College
in a FPTP country.
Trump admires Erdogan. He likes dictators in general and disdains western democratic leaders so he’ll probably take that as a compliment.
GreenTiger @ Tue Jun 26, 2018 9:50 am
Donald Trump is an unhinged scientifically illiterate bully, the way he presents himself reminds me of Nakita Khrushchev banging his shoes on the table at the UN still when one thinks about it try to imagine Hillary Clinton in the left seat (in aviation terms) if things went differently in 2016 things would definitely be a good deal worse.
martin14 @ Fri Jun 29, 2018 11:47 am
Private citizen giving interviews talking about government policies.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... orst-fears
$1:
Clinton accused Trump of retreating on his hardline immigration policy only because ‘even for him the optics were terrible’
Thanos Thanos:
I could mention that the extremism of ripping screaming children away from their mothers under a bogus fictional national security "threat" has engendered an exact opposite extremism on the other side but that would probably interfere with your dream-world vision
Oh you mean the policy that Bill Clinton signed, so no doubt
the Hildebeast knew about it ?
Oh yeah, that one.
martin14 @ Sun Jul 08, 2018 1:27 pm
https://nypost.com/2018/07/07/is-hillar ... n-in-2020/
Is Hillary Clinton secretly planning to run in 2020?
$1:
The messages convey a sense of urgency, and are coming with increasing frequency. They are short, focused reactions to the latest “outrage” committed by President Trump.
Some end by asking for money, some urge participation in protests. All read as if they are sent from the official headquarters of the resistance.
Hillary Clinton is up to something.
Five times in the last month alone, she sent e-mails touting her super PAC’s role in combating President Trump. Most seized on headline events, such as the family-separation issue at the southern border.
Under the message line, “horrific,” she wrote June 18: “This is a moral and humanitarian crisis. Everyone of us who has ever held a child in their arms, and every human being with a sense of compassion and decency should be outraged.” She said she warned about Trump’s immigration policies during the 2016 campaign.
Three days later, she was back again, saying that her group, Onward Together, raised $1 million and would split it among organizations working to change border policy, including the American Civil Liberties Union and a gaggle of immigrant, refugee, Latino and women’s groups.
And the day after Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, Clinton introduced a newly minted resistance partner. Called Demand Justice, it promises to protect “reproductive rights, voting rights and access to health care” by keeping Senate Democrats united in opposing any conservative Trump nominee.
The instant, in-house nature of Demand Justice was reflected by the name of its executive director: Brian Fallon, Clinton’s campaign press secretary.
In truth, Fallon’s role doesn’t tell us something we didn’t know. Onward Together, formed in May of 2017, is a Clinton 2020 campaign vehicle in waiting.
Its homepage says the group “is dedicated to advancing the vision that earned nearly 66 million votes in the last election.”
Advancing the vision? More like advancing the candidate who collected those votes despite not having a vision.
With the Democratic Party locked in a battle between its far left wing and its far, far left wing, no single leader has emerged to unite it. Clinton is trying to play that role by being a mother hen to the fledgling activists drawn to politics by their hatred of Trump.
If they were active in 2016, most probably supported Bernie Sanders in his primary challenge to Clinton. But by helping to fund them now, she is putting them in her debt for later.
Ah, but will she need their support later? Is she really going to make a third run for the White House?
Not long ago, I told a group of friends, all liberal Dems, that I believed she was keeping open the possibility of a rematch against Trump, and might already have decided to run.
It was unanimous — they were horrified. “I would not give her a single cent,” one man, formerly a big donor to Clinton, said emphatically.
Their reasons are no surprise: Her moment has passed, she was a terrible candidate and her endless claims of victimhood are tiring rather than inspiring. It’s time to find new blood.
Those assessments are unassailable, and certainly are shared by the 20 or so Dems lining up to take their shot at the nomination.
Moreover, there isn’t any clamoring for another Clinton run in Hollywood or other leftist hotbeds. They want a new blockbuster, not a sequel to failure.
So she’s toast, right? Maybe.
On the other hand, the odds are zero that she is playing community organizer just to be a kingmaker. When it comes to money and power, the Clintons assume charity begins at home.
Here’s how I believe she sees the playing field, and why she can’t be ignored.
First, because there’s no clear front-runner for the nomination 18 months into Trump’s presidency, Clinton remains the closest thing to an incumbent. She’s also got numerous advantages, from name recognition to campaign experience to an off-the-shelf Cabinet, that could give her a head start.
Second, a crowded, diverse field diminishes the chances of anyone knocking her off. Recall how Trump outlasted 16 GOP rivals by having a committed core of supporters that grew as the field shrunk. Clinton could be in a similar position — unpopular among many, but also unbeatable by a single opponent.
Third, looking ahead to the 2020 primaries, she sees no reason to fear the favorite daughters and sons in key blue states. She would almost certainly beat Sen. Kamala Harris in California, Sen. Cory Booker in New Jersey and Gov. Andrew Cuomo in New York.
And please — forget Sanders and Joe Biden. Sanders is already 76 and Biden, at 75, has never been a viable candidate for president and still isn’t.
Fourth, money is not an issue. Some donors will resist Clinton at first, but any Dem nominee can count on all the money in the world to run against Trump.
To be clear, there are scenarios where Clinton doesn’t run. Health reasons, for example, or a younger rival could rocket to the top of the pack and become the party’s next Barack Obama. Either way, recurring nightmares of two previous defeats would send her back to wandering through the Chappaqua woods.
For now, I am convinced Clinton wants to go for it. Doubters should recall the line about pols who get the presidential itch: There are only two cures — election or death.
Besides, the third time could be the charm.
Some end by asking for money, some urge participation in protests. All read as if they are sent from the official headquarters of the resistance.
Hillary Clinton is up to something.
Five times in the last month alone, she sent e-mails touting her super PAC’s role in combating President Trump. Most seized on headline events, such as the family-separation issue at the southern border.
Under the message line, “horrific,” she wrote June 18: “This is a moral and humanitarian crisis. Everyone of us who has ever held a child in their arms, and every human being with a sense of compassion and decency should be outraged.” She said she warned about Trump’s immigration policies during the 2016 campaign.
Three days later, she was back again, saying that her group, Onward Together, raised $1 million and would split it among organizations working to change border policy, including the American Civil Liberties Union and a gaggle of immigrant, refugee, Latino and women’s groups.
And the day after Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, Clinton introduced a newly minted resistance partner. Called Demand Justice, it promises to protect “reproductive rights, voting rights and access to health care” by keeping Senate Democrats united in opposing any conservative Trump nominee.
The instant, in-house nature of Demand Justice was reflected by the name of its executive director: Brian Fallon, Clinton’s campaign press secretary.
In truth, Fallon’s role doesn’t tell us something we didn’t know. Onward Together, formed in May of 2017, is a Clinton 2020 campaign vehicle in waiting.
Its homepage says the group “is dedicated to advancing the vision that earned nearly 66 million votes in the last election.”
Advancing the vision? More like advancing the candidate who collected those votes despite not having a vision.
With the Democratic Party locked in a battle between its far left wing and its far, far left wing, no single leader has emerged to unite it. Clinton is trying to play that role by being a mother hen to the fledgling activists drawn to politics by their hatred of Trump.
If they were active in 2016, most probably supported Bernie Sanders in his primary challenge to Clinton. But by helping to fund them now, she is putting them in her debt for later.
Ah, but will she need their support later? Is she really going to make a third run for the White House?
Not long ago, I told a group of friends, all liberal Dems, that I believed she was keeping open the possibility of a rematch against Trump, and might already have decided to run.
It was unanimous — they were horrified. “I would not give her a single cent,” one man, formerly a big donor to Clinton, said emphatically.
Their reasons are no surprise: Her moment has passed, she was a terrible candidate and her endless claims of victimhood are tiring rather than inspiring. It’s time to find new blood.
Those assessments are unassailable, and certainly are shared by the 20 or so Dems lining up to take their shot at the nomination.
Moreover, there isn’t any clamoring for another Clinton run in Hollywood or other leftist hotbeds. They want a new blockbuster, not a sequel to failure.
So she’s toast, right? Maybe.
On the other hand, the odds are zero that she is playing community organizer just to be a kingmaker. When it comes to money and power, the Clintons assume charity begins at home.
Here’s how I believe she sees the playing field, and why she can’t be ignored.
First, because there’s no clear front-runner for the nomination 18 months into Trump’s presidency, Clinton remains the closest thing to an incumbent. She’s also got numerous advantages, from name recognition to campaign experience to an off-the-shelf Cabinet, that could give her a head start.
Second, a crowded, diverse field diminishes the chances of anyone knocking her off. Recall how Trump outlasted 16 GOP rivals by having a committed core of supporters that grew as the field shrunk. Clinton could be in a similar position — unpopular among many, but also unbeatable by a single opponent.
Third, looking ahead to the 2020 primaries, she sees no reason to fear the favorite daughters and sons in key blue states. She would almost certainly beat Sen. Kamala Harris in California, Sen. Cory Booker in New Jersey and Gov. Andrew Cuomo in New York.
And please — forget Sanders and Joe Biden. Sanders is already 76 and Biden, at 75, has never been a viable candidate for president and still isn’t.
Fourth, money is not an issue. Some donors will resist Clinton at first, but any Dem nominee can count on all the money in the world to run against Trump.
To be clear, there are scenarios where Clinton doesn’t run. Health reasons, for example, or a younger rival could rocket to the top of the pack and become the party’s next Barack Obama. Either way, recurring nightmares of two previous defeats would send her back to wandering through the Chappaqua woods.
For now, I am convinced Clinton wants to go for it. Doubters should recall the line about pols who get the presidential itch: There are only two cures — election or death.
Besides, the third time could be the charm.
Freakinoldguy @ Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:26 pm
martin14 martin14:
https://nypost.com/2018/07/07/is-hillary-clinton-secretly-planning-to-run-in-2020/
Is Hillary Clinton secretly planning to run in 2020?
Is Hillary Clinton secretly planning to run in 2020?
$1:
The messages convey a sense of urgency, and are coming with increasing frequency. They are short, focused reactions to the latest “outrage” committed by President Trump.
Some end by asking for money, some urge participation in protests. All read as if they are sent from the official headquarters of the resistance.
Hillary Clinton is up to something.
Five times in the last month alone, she sent e-mails touting her super PAC’s role in combating President Trump. Most seized on headline events, such as the family-separation issue at the southern border.
Under the message line, “horrific,” she wrote June 18: “This is a moral and humanitarian crisis. Everyone of us who has ever held a child in their arms, and every human being with a sense of compassion and decency should be outraged.” She said she warned about Trump’s immigration policies during the 2016 campaign.
Three days later, she was back again, saying that her group, Onward Together, raised $1 million and would split it among organizations working to change border policy, including the American Civil Liberties Union and a gaggle of immigrant, refugee, Latino and women’s groups.
And the day after Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, Clinton introduced a newly minted resistance partner. Called Demand Justice, it promises to protect “reproductive rights, voting rights and access to health care” by keeping Senate Democrats united in opposing any conservative Trump nominee.
The instant, in-house nature of Demand Justice was reflected by the name of its executive director: Brian Fallon, Clinton’s campaign press secretary.
In truth, Fallon’s role doesn’t tell us something we didn’t know. Onward Together, formed in May of 2017, is a Clinton 2020 campaign vehicle in waiting.
Its homepage says the group “is dedicated to advancing the vision that earned nearly 66 million votes in the last election.”
Advancing the vision? More like advancing the candidate who collected those votes despite not having a vision.
With the Democratic Party locked in a battle between its far left wing and its far, far left wing, no single leader has emerged to unite it. Clinton is trying to play that role by being a mother hen to the fledgling activists drawn to politics by their hatred of Trump.
If they were active in 2016, most probably supported Bernie Sanders in his primary challenge to Clinton. But by helping to fund them now, she is putting them in her debt for later.
Ah, but will she need their support later? Is she really going to make a third run for the White House?
Not long ago, I told a group of friends, all liberal Dems, that I believed she was keeping open the possibility of a rematch against Trump, and might already have decided to run.
It was unanimous — they were horrified. “I would not give her a single cent,” one man, formerly a big donor to Clinton, said emphatically.
Their reasons are no surprise: Her moment has passed, she was a terrible candidate and her endless claims of victimhood are tiring rather than inspiring. It’s time to find new blood.
Those assessments are unassailable, and certainly are shared by the 20 or so Dems lining up to take their shot at the nomination.
Moreover, there isn’t any clamoring for another Clinton run in Hollywood or other leftist hotbeds. They want a new blockbuster, not a sequel to failure.
So she’s toast, right? Maybe.
On the other hand, the odds are zero that she is playing community organizer just to be a kingmaker. When it comes to money and power, the Clintons assume charity begins at home.
Here’s how I believe she sees the playing field, and why she can’t be ignored.
First, because there’s no clear front-runner for the nomination 18 months into Trump’s presidency, Clinton remains the closest thing to an incumbent. She’s also got numerous advantages, from name recognition to campaign experience to an off-the-shelf Cabinet, that could give her a head start.
Second, a crowded, diverse field diminishes the chances of anyone knocking her off. Recall how Trump outlasted 16 GOP rivals by having a committed core of supporters that grew as the field shrunk. Clinton could be in a similar position — unpopular among many, but also unbeatable by a single opponent.
Third, looking ahead to the 2020 primaries, she sees no reason to fear the favorite daughters and sons in key blue states. She would almost certainly beat Sen. Kamala Harris in California, Sen. Cory Booker in New Jersey and Gov. Andrew Cuomo in New York.
And please — forget Sanders and Joe Biden. Sanders is already 76 and Biden, at 75, has never been a viable candidate for president and still isn’t.
Fourth, money is not an issue. Some donors will resist Clinton at first, but any Dem nominee can count on all the money in the world to run against Trump.
To be clear, there are scenarios where Clinton doesn’t run. Health reasons, for example, or a younger rival could rocket to the top of the pack and become the party’s next Barack Obama. Either way, recurring nightmares of two previous defeats would send her back to wandering through the Chappaqua woods.
For now, I am convinced Clinton wants to go for it. Doubters should recall the line about pols who get the presidential itch: There are only two cures — election or death.
Besides, the third time could be the charm.
Some end by asking for money, some urge participation in protests. All read as if they are sent from the official headquarters of the resistance.
Hillary Clinton is up to something.
Five times in the last month alone, she sent e-mails touting her super PAC’s role in combating President Trump. Most seized on headline events, such as the family-separation issue at the southern border.
Under the message line, “horrific,” she wrote June 18: “This is a moral and humanitarian crisis. Everyone of us who has ever held a child in their arms, and every human being with a sense of compassion and decency should be outraged.” She said she warned about Trump’s immigration policies during the 2016 campaign.
Three days later, she was back again, saying that her group, Onward Together, raised $1 million and would split it among organizations working to change border policy, including the American Civil Liberties Union and a gaggle of immigrant, refugee, Latino and women’s groups.
And the day after Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, Clinton introduced a newly minted resistance partner. Called Demand Justice, it promises to protect “reproductive rights, voting rights and access to health care” by keeping Senate Democrats united in opposing any conservative Trump nominee.
The instant, in-house nature of Demand Justice was reflected by the name of its executive director: Brian Fallon, Clinton’s campaign press secretary.
In truth, Fallon’s role doesn’t tell us something we didn’t know. Onward Together, formed in May of 2017, is a Clinton 2020 campaign vehicle in waiting.
Its homepage says the group “is dedicated to advancing the vision that earned nearly 66 million votes in the last election.”
Advancing the vision? More like advancing the candidate who collected those votes despite not having a vision.
With the Democratic Party locked in a battle between its far left wing and its far, far left wing, no single leader has emerged to unite it. Clinton is trying to play that role by being a mother hen to the fledgling activists drawn to politics by their hatred of Trump.
If they were active in 2016, most probably supported Bernie Sanders in his primary challenge to Clinton. But by helping to fund them now, she is putting them in her debt for later.
Ah, but will she need their support later? Is she really going to make a third run for the White House?
Not long ago, I told a group of friends, all liberal Dems, that I believed she was keeping open the possibility of a rematch against Trump, and might already have decided to run.
It was unanimous — they were horrified. “I would not give her a single cent,” one man, formerly a big donor to Clinton, said emphatically.
Their reasons are no surprise: Her moment has passed, she was a terrible candidate and her endless claims of victimhood are tiring rather than inspiring. It’s time to find new blood.
Those assessments are unassailable, and certainly are shared by the 20 or so Dems lining up to take their shot at the nomination.
Moreover, there isn’t any clamoring for another Clinton run in Hollywood or other leftist hotbeds. They want a new blockbuster, not a sequel to failure.
So she’s toast, right? Maybe.
On the other hand, the odds are zero that she is playing community organizer just to be a kingmaker. When it comes to money and power, the Clintons assume charity begins at home.
Here’s how I believe she sees the playing field, and why she can’t be ignored.
First, because there’s no clear front-runner for the nomination 18 months into Trump’s presidency, Clinton remains the closest thing to an incumbent. She’s also got numerous advantages, from name recognition to campaign experience to an off-the-shelf Cabinet, that could give her a head start.
Second, a crowded, diverse field diminishes the chances of anyone knocking her off. Recall how Trump outlasted 16 GOP rivals by having a committed core of supporters that grew as the field shrunk. Clinton could be in a similar position — unpopular among many, but also unbeatable by a single opponent.
Third, looking ahead to the 2020 primaries, she sees no reason to fear the favorite daughters and sons in key blue states. She would almost certainly beat Sen. Kamala Harris in California, Sen. Cory Booker in New Jersey and Gov. Andrew Cuomo in New York.
And please — forget Sanders and Joe Biden. Sanders is already 76 and Biden, at 75, has never been a viable candidate for president and still isn’t.
Fourth, money is not an issue. Some donors will resist Clinton at first, but any Dem nominee can count on all the money in the world to run against Trump.
To be clear, there are scenarios where Clinton doesn’t run. Health reasons, for example, or a younger rival could rocket to the top of the pack and become the party’s next Barack Obama. Either way, recurring nightmares of two previous defeats would send her back to wandering through the Chappaqua woods.
For now, I am convinced Clinton wants to go for it. Doubters should recall the line about pols who get the presidential itch: There are only two cures — election or death.
Besides, the third time could be the charm.
You have got to be shitting me.
When it comes to Hildebeast becoming President of the US the fact is that she's been schooled more times than a dyslexic 12 year old and won't graduate from wannabe to leader, yet again. But, if she should decide to throw her hat into the ring again I'd hope the Democratic Party would have the foresight and integrity to politely tell her to go fuck herself and run as an independent. Because, if they're stupid enough to let her run as a Democrat again they're also too stupid to take the reigns of Gov't and will likely ensure that President Trump get's his second term.
Thanos @ Mon Jul 09, 2018 12:46 am
In this clobberingly awful age we're stuck in I'd wager no worse than 50/50 that the Dems are exactly stupid and gutless enough to let Clinton run again. Their opposition to Trump has been nothing short of pathetic so it's a safe bet that they would do something as jaw-droppingly ridiculous as giving her a second chance.
GreenTiger @ Mon Jul 09, 2018 5:11 am
Thanos Thanos:
In this clobberingly awful age we're stuck in I'd wager no worse than 50/50 that the Dems are exactly stupid and gutless enough to let Clinton run again. Their opposition to Trump has been nothing short of pathetic so it's a safe bet that they would do something as jaw-droppingly ridiculous as giving her a second chance.
Only if the Democrats want to guarantee Mr. Trumps reelection in 2020.
martin14 @ Mon Jul 16, 2018 1:34 am
'Do you know which team you play for?' Hillary Clinton trolls Trump before his summit meeting with Putin
Trump landed in Helsinki a day before summit meeting with Russian leader
U.S. is abuzz over indictments against 12 alleged Russian hackers
Trump's campaign is being investigated for alleged collusion with Russia
Both Trump and Russia deny there was any collusion during 2016 campaign
BRAH @ Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:13 am
Thanos Thanos:
In this clobberingly awful age we're stuck in I'd wager no worse than 50/50 that the Dems are exactly stupid and gutless enough to let Clinton run again. Their opposition to Trump has been nothing short of pathetic so it's a safe bet that they would do something as jaw-droppingly ridiculous as giving her a second chance.
It's a given the Democrats are going to let Hillary Clinton run in 2020.
GreenTiger @ Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:41 am
BRAH BRAH:
Thanos Thanos:
In this clobberingly awful age we're stuck in I'd wager no worse than 50/50 that the Dems are exactly stupid and gutless enough to let Clinton run again. Their opposition to Trump has been nothing short of pathetic so it's a safe bet that they would do something as jaw-droppingly ridiculous as giving her a second chance.
It's a given the Democrats are going to let Hillary Clinton run in 2020.
That should guarantee Mr Trump 4 more years. I found it nauseating in 2016 that the choice was Donald Trump or HildaBeast. It might be that way again. I did enjoy Watching HildaBeast lose. That by itself was worth a party.
BeaverFever @ Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:37 am
martin14 martin14:
'Do you know which team you play for?' Hillary Clinton trolls Trump before his summit meeting with Putin
Trump landed in Helsinki a day before summit meeting with Russian leader
U.S. is abuzz over indictments against 12 alleged Russian hackers
Trump's campaign is being investigated for alleged collusion with Russia
Both Trump and Russia deny there was any collusion during 2016 campaign
Trump landed in Helsinki a day before summit meeting with Russian leader
U.S. is abuzz over indictments against 12 alleged Russian hackers
Trump's campaign is being investigated for alleged collusion with Russia
Both Trump and Russia deny there was any collusion during 2016 campaign
“Do you know what team you play for” has a double meaning since Trump is both a traitor and Putin’s gay rim job boy.
BRAH @ Wed Jul 18, 2018 5:20 am
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
BRAH BRAH:
Thanos Thanos:
In this clobberingly awful age we're stuck in I'd wager no worse than 50/50 that the Dems are exactly stupid and gutless enough to let Clinton run again. Their opposition to Trump has been nothing short of pathetic so it's a safe bet that they would do something as jaw-droppingly ridiculous as giving her a second chance.
It's a given the Democrats are going to let Hillary Clinton run in 2020.
That should guarantee Mr Trump 4 more years. I found it nauseating in 2016 that the choice was Donald Trump or HildaBeast. It might be that way again. I did enjoy Watching HildaBeast lose. That by itself was worth a party.
Democrats and Republicans need to drain the swamp of establishment types or Trump will not be the only outsider taking over.
GreenTiger @ Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:14 am
Hopefully in November we the American people can stop reelecting these miscreants.
martin14 @ Sat Jul 21, 2018 10:02 pm
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
Hopefully in November we the American people can stop reelecting these miscreants.
Better get active with that, sitting on your butt this time will be dangerous.
'As a former KGB spy, he knows how to manipulate': Hillary Clinton hints that Putin played Trump during the Helsinki summit and questions why the president has not 'spoken up for our country'
$1:
Hillary Clinton spoke on Saturday at OZY Fest in Manhattan's Central Park
Laurene Powell Jobs interviewed the former candidate on current events
Clinton slammed President Trump for his recent meeting with Vladimir Putin
'We don't know what was said in the room with just the two of them,' she said
Said Putin is 'quite adept at reading people and knowing how to manipulate'
Clinton blasted Trump saying he 'has not spoken up for our country'
Laurene Powell Jobs interviewed the former candidate on current events
Clinton slammed President Trump for his recent meeting with Vladimir Putin
'We don't know what was said in the room with just the two of them,' she said
Said Putin is 'quite adept at reading people and knowing how to manipulate'
Clinton blasted Trump saying he 'has not spoken up for our country'
Hillary still wants to 'teach the world a thing or two'
$1:
The former candidate proposed that the US should teach the rest of the world to embrace diversity.
'We should be a model for how a big, diverse, pluralistic society thrives together. Our diversity is one of our strongest assets in the 21st century. And change is always hard. I understand that.'
'We should be a model for how a big, diverse, pluralistic society thrives together. Our diversity is one of our strongest assets in the 21st century. And change is always hard. I understand that.'
from the comments;
$1:
I don't know, call me forgetful, but tell me again why you didn't speak up for Chris Stevens as he was being bru.tali.zed by the Libyans, and the other 3 men who were beg ging for help? I honestly just can't, for the life of me, remember what you said.Also, did you ever tell the families that you lied when you told them it was a video that caused a "riot" that kil.led their sons? Remember how you told them that at the airport while all of you were standing next to their sons' cof.fins? In the meantime, kindly step down off that pedestal you seem to think you deserve.
Careful reading the story, what has been seen cannot be unseen.
martin14 @ Sun Jul 22, 2018 9:36 pm
Tough to decide which thread to put this story..
PICTURED: Hillary and Bill's intimate dinner with Harvey Weinstein weeks after her election loss - showing just how close the Clintons were to the 'serial rapist' movie mogul
The Clintons were reported to have dined with Harvey Weinstein, wife Georgina Chapman and his lawyer David Boies in December 2016
Photos obtained by DailyMail.com capture the group sitting at a table at Rao's in Harlem chatting over some wine and grub
The dinner outing came just five weeks after Trump had been elected president
The film mogul had been a longtime major donor to the Clintons - having given $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation and $10,000 to Bill's legal fund
Hillary and Harvey were in talks to create a documentary on her failed campaign
Previous 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 20 Next