Trump And Ford Appeal To The Disenfranchised

Donald Trump’s candidacy for the U.S. presidency has attracted a lot of scorn for many of Trump’s supporters. Kevin Williamson and David French wrote contemptuously in the National Review about how the working-class Americans supporting Trump had no one to blame but themselves for their problems. They failed themselves, and they should have known better.

A similar contempt emerged in some circles towards ‘Ford Nation’, the supporters of Toronto’s former Mayor, the late Rob Ford. [url]Michael Bolen[/url] shared Williamson’s and French’s contempt when he wrote in the Huffington Post about the supposed bigotry and disdain for intelligence expressed by Ford’s supporters.

Apparently it’s never occurred to Bolen or anyone else that this kind of contempt is what’s driven so many people to support Trump, Ford and others like them. In her book Crazy Town: The Rob Ford Story, Toronto journalist Robyn Doolittle talked about how many people in downtown Toronto lived almost in a bubble, dismissing the idea that someone like Ford could ever be elected in their city.

Ford’s election was a rude awakening.

Some observers are already noticing a similar issue with Donald Trump. William McGurnwrote in the Wall Street Journal about Trump supporters being concerned about how their children will fare in a shaky economy, and noted the snide comments made by pundits towards the masses who disagreed with them. Alec McGillis echoed this in The Atlantic, writing about the contempt directed at Trump supporters from both the left and the right.

It’s worth considering what could really be motivating the support for figures like Trump and Ford. David Daymen wrote in The American Prospect about how pro-Brexit voters supported Leave because they were frustrated with an elite that claimed it knew best, while the Leave voters were struggling due to the elite’s leadership. Joseph Heath wrote on the In Due Course blog about Ford supporters who supported him because he could address their concerns, while they felt ignored by people who were part of the Toronto establishment.

Whether in the U.S., the United Kingdom or Canada, the problem has been much the same. Many people feel left behind by the changes happening today, whether in terms of immigration or trade. They don’t think the established leadership and elites care about their problems. When they voice their concerns, they’re often attacked as racist, small-minded, unable to compete, etc.

How much of an effort have political movements, particularly on the left, actually made to try and engage these peoples’ concerns? Sometimes they do in addressing the economic issues that people have raised, but in turn it’s drowned out by voices like Bolen and Williamson, who end up making everybody who could be associated with them look bad.

I’m not a fan of Donald Trump or Rob Ford, but I can see why people support them. That sense of being neglected and looked down upon is what’s so frustrating. People support Trump or Ford partly to get back at the elites, and partly because they don’t think other candidates and movements care about them.

The question, though, is how do more mainstream movements and parties actually address the issues of Trump or Ford supporters, and make them feel like their concerns actually matter?

Demagoguery is difficult to address in difficult times when the standard system has left so many behind as essentially disposable. It's less what the demagogue is doing right than what the other standard parties are doing wrong. In the American example the belief is that the Democrats will continue their assault on middle America in favour of minorities, failed diversity, cultural Marxism, and political correctness, and that the establishment GOP will continue their sell-out of middle America in favour of the uber-wealthy, Forever War lunatics, and the globalists.

Trump was ironically correct when he said "what have you got to lose?" by voting for him. I'm 100% certain he'll make everything even worse than it is now if he's elected because he's a simply awful person who is no where near as smart or skilled as he keeps saying he is, and there's more than enough evidence from his business dealings that he's even worse of a crook than Clinton is. It means little though if those who feel they've been sold out the worst and had their country stolen from them have no faith left in the standard system. Nothing to lose means extremism becomes more likely, and an extreme reaction in a voting booth can end up causing as much damage as a car bomb on a crowded street.