Previous  1  2

Pfff... we're getting ripped off. We don't need fancy helicopters like that! The UBC Engineers are working on a self-propelled helicopter (powered by the sole occupant's pedalling). I bet they could build those for a couple G each... what more do we need?? <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/wink.gif' alt='Wink'>

   

[QUOTE BY= Kory Yamashita] Pfff... we're getting ripped off. We don't need fancy helicopters like that! The UBC Engineers are working on a self-propelled helicopter (powered by the sole occupant's pedalling). I bet they could build those for a couple G each... what more do we need?? <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/wink.gif' alt='Wink'>[/QUOTE] <br /> <br />haha yeah we can just hook some hellfires onto them <br /> <br />and why the hell do we need to pedal we can just use chainsaw motors <br /> <br />

   

And skip all the fancy gones and stuff. We're from Canada! Lets use snow balls. And flying hockey pucks.

   

[QUOTE BY= Kory Yamashita] And skip all the fancy gones and stuff. We're from Canada! Lets use snow balls. And flying hockey pucks.[/QUOTE] <br /> <br />yeah and we don't need to spend all that money on researching and developing tactics lets just use the newest hockey canada coaching book. <br /> <br />I am sure we can adapt the trap and the torpedo to aerial warfare <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/mrgreen.gif' alt='Mr. Green'>

   

Just so you know I am scared of all of you! <br /> <br /> <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/wink.gif' alt='Wink'>

   

[QUOTE BY= robert_fisher] Just so you know I am scared of all of you! <br /> <br /> <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/wink.gif' alt='Wink'> [/QUOTE] <br /> <br />Thats a good thing it will make my military coup all that easier!!! One down 31 million to go <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/mrgreen.gif' alt='Mr. Green'>

   

<img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/lol.gif' alt='Laughing Out Loud'> <br /> <br />

   

Don Cherry can head our military.. hey, he is one of the greatest Canadians after all *rolls eyes*.

   

[QUOTE BY= Stymiest] I believe the EH-101 was a better helicopter and it should of been purchased in the first place. Some people withint the forces still feel the EH-101 is a more capable machine then the H-92. Who knows how much the libs got these for though. <br /> <br />[/QUOTE] <br /> <br /> Well the newest helicopters we bought are variants of the EH-101's so far they have been grounded twice that I know of. Their maintenance hours to flight hours is something like 22 hours for every hour of flight. They claim the Sea King's is 30 hours and the Sea Kings are 40 years old!!! <br /> <br /> Do you believe the EH-101 IS A BETTER HELICOPTER BECAUSE YOU SUPPORT THE LYING CON SERVATIVES! <br /> <br />LOOKS LIKE IT TO ME!

   

[QUOTE BY= cagerattler] [QUOTE BY= Stymiest] I believe the EH-101 was a better helicopter and it should of been purchased in the first place. Some people withint the forces still feel the EH-101 is a more capable machine then the H-92. Who knows how much the libs got these for though. <br /> <br />[/QUOTE] <br /> <br /> Well the newest helicopters we bought are variants of the EH-101's so far they have been grounded twice that I know of. Their maintenance hours to flight hours is something like 22 hours for every hour of flight. They claim the Sea King's is 30 hours and the Sea Kings are 40 years old!!! <br /> <br /> Do you believe the EH-101 IS A BETTER HELICOPTER BECAUSE YOU SUPPORT THE LYING CON SERVATIVES! <br /> <br />LOOKS LIKE IT TO ME! [/QUOTE] <br /> <br />Dude i support the EH-101's because they are combat proven and are state of the art. I don't bring politics into my military views because I think bringing politics into the armed forces only lowers force capability.

   

[QUOTE BY= Stymiest] [QUOTE BY= cagerattler] [QUOTE BY= Stymiest] I believe the EH-101 was a better helicopter and it should of been purchased in the first place. Some people withint the forces still feel the EH-101 is a more capable machine then the H-92. Who knows how much the libs got these for though. <br /> <br />[/QUOTE] <br /> <br /> Well the newest helicopters we bought are variants of the EH-101's so far they have been grounded twice that I know of. Their maintenance hours to flight hours is something like 22 hours for every hour of flight. They claim the Sea King's is 30 hours and the Sea Kings are 40 years old!!! <br /> <br /> Do you believe the EH-101 IS A BETTER HELICOPTER BECAUSE YOU SUPPORT THE LYING CON SERVATIVES! <br /> <br />LOOKS LIKE IT TO ME! [/QUOTE] <br /> <br />Dude i support the EH-101's because they are combat proven and are state of the art. I don't bring politics into my military views because I think bringing politics into the armed forces only lowers force capability.[/QUOTE] <br /> <br /> <br />Yeah, but apparently if you go to Army.ca they support the Sikorsky H-92 purchase, because the Cormorants are fairly unreliable and require parts all the way fom Italy. <br /> <br />I do realize the Cormorants are battle-tested, so we'll see. I think politics and local contracts own the day on this one. <br /> <br />I too favoured the Cormorants, if only to punish the U.S. for our softwood-dispute. <br /> <br />50 EH-101's for the same price as 28 never-built-before Sikorskys if a much better deal. <br /> <br />This being said, apparently our Sea-Kings were great for their time, considering computers were not involved in the design process....they also don't fall out of the sky any more than a U.S. Black-Hawk does, so you know, helicopters are always dangerous.

   

Previous  1  2