Why won't Universal Healthcare work in the United States?
Jaime_Souviens @ Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:24 pm
DerbyX DerbyX:
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Don't put words in my mouth. Calling "poor" people lazy is a racist remark. It doesn't just mean colour you know.
Derby.... racism is race-ism. Discrimination due to race... but bigotry (or classism, but that's not a real word) would be what you're looking for...
(Not another dictionary debate!)
I should have used "eliteism".
Actually, you might want to take a stab at "elitism".
"Classism" actually does work as a word, but usually only found in academic circles.
But if you're looking to be inflammatory and offensive, (which is usually your goal), then why not go for the far more inflammatory and offensive term and throw it around recklessly, and then not apologize for it.
Because that seems to be really where you're trying to go with all of this...
Right back at you slick. Any moron posting a sentiment that the only people in the US who cannot afford heatlh insurance are "lazy" pretty much fits the profile.
You're attacking the wrong person. I didn't say that.
I never said you did. You just didn't understand that calling the poster who said that was a fair assesment.
Jamie wrote:
$1:
It seems you can't even keep track of the points.
And that you're belligerent with anybody and everybody.
And that you're belligerent with anybody and everybody.
Hardly, in fact there are only a few I'm like that with and those people are themselves beligerent.
Well, as you can see from the quoted material in this post, you started off by calling someone a racist without knowing what it meant.
And then, also right in the quotes above, you say "Right back at you slick." to me, when you now claim you were talking about someone else.
So, it seems you're either a jackass or an idiot. --You sure those are the options you want to leave for yourself?
DerbyX @ Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:38 pm
Man you are a fuckwit.
$1:
But if you're looking to be inflammatory and offensive, (which is usually your goal)
See the goal part? That was the right back at you slick reference. Get it now?
Racist is a term that applies to similiar sentiments involving religion, even though we do not define human "races" by that. The point was made regardless whatever crying you want to do about it.
$1:
So, it seems you're either a jackass or an idiot. --You sure those are the options you want to leave for yourself?
Considering you've been bested by me, Dayseed, Mustang1, Patrick_ross, Ice_owl, Gunplummer, well the list just seems to grow weekly, you have no standing to cast aspersions.
Jaime_Souviens @ Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:49 pm
DerbyX DerbyX:
Racist is a term that applies to similiar sentiments involving religion, even though we do not define human "races" by that. The point was made regardless whatever crying you want to do about it.
That just isn't true... you can't just misuse a word and then say that's what it really means.
$1:
Considering you've been bested by me, Dayseed, Mustang1, Patrick_ross, Ice_owl, Gunplummer, well the list just seems to grow weekly, you have no standing to cast aspersions.
Keep on believing it, dude. --That idea's right up there with all the other misinformation, half-truths, and ranting bigotry that's kicking around in that tangled brain of yours.
CanadaKA is having a closed-minded competition next month, be sure to sign up.
Oh, and God loves you.
hwacker @ Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:00 pm
$1:
Oh, and God loves you
Ah, not from what he said to me today. I didn't think God used those words but i was wrong.
DerbyX @ Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:05 pm
$1:
DerbyX wrote:
Racist is a term that applies to similiar sentiments involving religion, even though we do not define human "races" by that. The point was made regardless whatever crying you want to do about it.
That just isn't true... you can't just misuse a word and then say that's what it really means.
Racist is a term that applies to similiar sentiments involving religion, even though we do not define human "races" by that. The point was made regardless whatever crying you want to do about it.
That just isn't true... you can't just misuse a word and then say that's what it really means.
$1:
racist
adj 1: based on racial intolerance; "racist remarks" 2: discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion [syn: antiblack, anti-Semitic, anti-Semite(a)] n : a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others [syn: racialist]
adj 1: based on racial intolerance; "racist remarks" 2: discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion [syn: antiblack, anti-Semitic, anti-Semite(a)] n : a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others [syn: racialist]
Wrong again. Old habits are hard to break.
$1:
Quote:
Considering you've been bested by me, Dayseed, Mustang1, Patrick_ross, Ice_owl, Gunplummer, well the list just seems to grow weekly, you have no standing to cast aspersions.
Keep on believing it, dude. --That idea's right up there with all the other misinformation, half-truths, and ranting bigotry that's kicking around in that tangled brain of yours.
CanadaKA is having a closed-minded competition next month, be sure to sign up.
Considering you've been bested by me, Dayseed, Mustang1, Patrick_ross, Ice_owl, Gunplummer, well the list just seems to grow weekly, you have no standing to cast aspersions.
Keep on believing it, dude. --That idea's right up there with all the other misinformation, half-truths, and ranting bigotry that's kicking around in that tangled brain of yours.
CanadaKA is having a closed-minded competition next month, be sure to sign up.
Yes a bigot who believes in equal rights, SSM, not nuking the entire middle east too get at a few extremists and a general liberal outlook on life. I understand why someone of your limited intelligence would say that.
$1:
Oh, and God loves you.
So does my girlfirend but she's real.
Jaime_Souviens @ Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:11 pm
DerbyX DerbyX:
$1:
DerbyX wrote:
Racist is a term that applies to similiar sentiments involving religion, even though we do not define human "races" by that. The point was made regardless whatever crying you want to do about it.
That just isn't true... you can't just misuse a word and then say that's what it really means.
Racist is a term that applies to similiar sentiments involving religion, even though we do not define human "races" by that. The point was made regardless whatever crying you want to do about it.
That just isn't true... you can't just misuse a word and then say that's what it really means.
$1:
racist
adj 1: based on racial intolerance; "racist remarks" 2: discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion [syn: antiblack, anti-Semitic, anti-Semite(a)] n : a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others [syn: racialist]
adj 1: based on racial intolerance; "racist remarks" 2: discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion [syn: antiblack, anti-Semitic, anti-Semite(a)] n : a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others [syn: racialist]
Wrong again. Old habits are hard to break.
And you used it for a class distinction. You were wrong. Now you're lying about it.
You used to have some sort of character, but I guess you can get past that when the chips are down.
DerbyX DerbyX:
$1:
Quote:
Considering you've been bested by me, Dayseed, Mustang1, Patrick_ross, Ice_owl, Gunplummer, well the list just seems to grow weekly, you have no standing to cast aspersions.
Keep on believing it, dude. --That idea's right up there with all the other misinformation, half-truths, and ranting bigotry that's kicking around in that tangled brain of yours.
CanadaKA is having a closed-minded competition next month, be sure to sign up.
Considering you've been bested by me, Dayseed, Mustang1, Patrick_ross, Ice_owl, Gunplummer, well the list just seems to grow weekly, you have no standing to cast aspersions.
Keep on believing it, dude. --That idea's right up there with all the other misinformation, half-truths, and ranting bigotry that's kicking around in that tangled brain of yours.
CanadaKA is having a closed-minded competition next month, be sure to sign up.
Yes a bigot who believes in equal rights, SSM, not nuking the entire middle east too get at a few extremists and a general liberal outlook on life. I understand why someone of your limited intelligence would say that.
Closed minded arrogance is closed minded arrogance no matter the political content.
And a bigot is a bigot, no matter who he prefers.
It is natural that the difference would elude you.
DerbyX @ Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:17 pm
$1:
And you used it for a class distinction. You were wrong. Now you're lying about it.
You used to have some sort of character, but I guess you can get past that when the chips are down.
You used to have some sort of character, but I guess you can get past that when the chips are down.
No. I admitted that I should have used "elitist" back when Blue_Nose pointed out the classism angle. My point (which you missed yet again) was that the "point" I was trying to make came across.
I then said:
$1:
Racist is a term that applies to similiar sentiments involving religion, even though we do not define human "races" by that. The point was made regardless whatever crying you want to do about it.
And you responded:
$1:
That just isn't true... you can't just misuse a word and then say that's what it really means.
To which I proved you were wrong with the posted definition.
$1:
Closed minded arrogance is closed minded arrogance no matter the political content.
And a bigot is a bigot, no matter who he prefers.
It is natural that the difference would elude you.
And a bigot is a bigot, no matter who he prefers.
It is natural that the difference would elude you.
Sticks & Stones. Your opinion matters not. I'm done with you for tonight.
Jaime_Souviens @ Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:42 pm
DerbyX DerbyX:
Your opinion matters not.
It's true. It doesn't mean a thing.
(I don't even listen to myself anymore, I annoy me.)
But you might want to check on your opinion of yourself.