Stand For Thee!
Tricks @ Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:58 pm
lily lily:
live and learn, Tricks.
I'm already learned 
Tricks @ Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:02 pm
lily lily:
Then all you need to do is live. 
Takes too long 
OPP @ Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:05 pm
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
If I must.
I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Why?I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Becaus a soldier defends his/hers nations borders and interests, not his/hers peoples freedomes.
It is ridiculous.
RUEZ @ Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:23 pm
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
live and learn, Tricks.
I'm already learned
Tricks @ Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:04 pm
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
If I must.
I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Why?I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Becaus a soldier defends his/hers nations borders and interests, not his/hers peoples freedomes.
It is ridiculous.
Tricks @ Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:07 pm
RUEZ RUEZ:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
live and learn, Tricks.
I'm already learned
OPP @ Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:42 am
Tricks Tricks:
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
If I must.
I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Why?I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Becaus a soldier defends his/hers nations borders and interests, not his/hers peoples freedomes.
It is ridiculous.
No it is not. Pursuing national interests often result in limitations in the individuals freedomes. Take the U.S for example. A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society.
Regina @ Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:05 am
OPP OPP:
No it is not. Pursuing national interests often result in limitations in the individuals freedomes. Take the U.S for example. A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society.
A military state??!! Care to explain when the US became a military state?
OPP @ Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:06 am
Regina Regina:
OPP OPP:
No it is not. Pursuing national interests often result in limitations in the individuals freedomes. Take the U.S for example. A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society.
A military state??!! Care to explain when the US became a military state?
Never said they were. Witch hunting again?
Regina @ Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:16 am
OPP OPP:
Regina Regina:
OPP OPP:
No it is not. Pursuing national interests often result in limitations in the individuals freedomes. Take the U.S for example. A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society.
A military state??!! Care to explain when the US became a military state?
Never said they were. Witch hunting again?
Yes you did..........."Take the U.S for example." Care to explain?
Regina @ Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:20 am
OPP OPP:
Never said they were. Witch hunting again?
I see you've also run away from your other historical inaccuracies too.
http://www.canadaka.net/modules.php?nam ... 6&start=15
OPP @ Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:21 am
Regina Regina:
OPP OPP:
Regina Regina:
OPP OPP:
No it is not. Pursuing national interests often result in limitations in the individuals freedomes. Take the U.S for example. A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society.
A military state??!! Care to explain when the US became a military state?
Never said they were. Witch hunting again?
Yes you did..........."Take the U.S for example." Care to explain?
With all the legislations that has been pased in in resent history in the U.S and with all the fuz about it I didn't think I had to elaborate.
"A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society." had nothing to do with the example given. You jumped to conclutions.
OPP @ Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:23 am
Regina Regina:
OPP OPP:
Never said they were. Witch hunting again?
I see you've also run away from your other historical inaccuracies too.
http://www.canadaka.net/modules.php?nam ... 6&start=15
I didn't run away. I said I'll continue the discussion and I will. I don't have time now.
Regina @ Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:25 am
OPP OPP:
With all the legislations that has been pased in in resent history in the U.S and with all the fuz about it I didn't think I had to elaborate.
"A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society." had nothing to do with the example given. You jumped to conclutions.
"A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society." had nothing to do with the example given. You jumped to conclutions.
You make no sense what so ever.
Tricks @ Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:43 am
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
If I must.
I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Why?I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Becaus a soldier defends his/hers nations borders and interests, not his/hers peoples freedomes.
It is ridiculous.
No it is not. Pursuing national interests often result in limitations in the individuals freedomes. Take the U.S for example. A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society.