Stand For Thee!
OPP @ Sat Aug 11, 2007 8:36 am
Tricks Tricks:
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
If I must.
I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Why?I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Becaus a soldier defends his/hers nations borders and interests, not his/hers peoples freedomes.
It is ridiculous.
No it is not. Pursuing national interests often result in limitations in the individuals freedomes. Take the U.S for example. A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society.
That's odd. I don't seem to remember Bush ever mentioning freedomes above security in his "national interest" speeches? Care to explain?
Toro @ Sat Aug 11, 2007 8:38 am
You'd have to be on crack to think the US is a "military state."
OPP @ Sat Aug 11, 2007 8:44 am
Toro Toro:
You'd have to be on crack to think the US is a "military state."
I don't think it is and I never said it was.
I was trying to save some time by not elaborating. I was stressed out as hell. My GF's birthday yesterday and was in a hurry.
Alta_redneck @ Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:22 am
OPP OPP:
Toro Toro:
You'd have to be on crack to think the US is a "military state."
I don't think it is and I never said it was.
I was trying to save some time by not elaborating. I was stressed out as hell. My GF's birthday yesterday and was in a hurry.
It was Grain Feds birthday yesterday? happy b-day grainfed
OPP @ Sat Aug 11, 2007 10:27 am
WDHIII WDHIII:
Alta_redneck Alta_redneck:
OPP OPP:
Toro Toro:
You'd have to be on crack to think the US is a "military state."
I don't think it is and I never said it was.
I was trying to save some time by not elaborating. I was stressed out as hell. My GF's birthday yesterday and was in a hurry.
It was Grain Feds birthday yesterday? happy b-day grainfed
They make such a lovely couple
Single are we?
Tricks @ Sat Aug 11, 2007 10:27 am
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
If I must.
I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Why?I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Becaus a soldier defends his/hers nations borders and interests, not his/hers peoples freedomes.
It is ridiculous.
No it is not. Pursuing national interests often result in limitations in the individuals freedomes. Take the U.S for example. A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society.
That's odd. I don't seem to remember Bush ever mentioning freedomes above security in his "national interest" speeches? Care to explain?
I find it funny that the government has to say it is a national interest for you to think it is. The same government you accuse of orchestrating 9/11. WTF is wrong with that?
OPP @ Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:34 pm
Tricks Tricks:
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
OPP OPP:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
If I must.
I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Why?I object to the use of the word "only" in the statement.
Becaus a soldier defends his/hers nations borders and interests, not his/hers peoples freedomes.
It is ridiculous.
No it is not. Pursuing national interests often result in limitations in the individuals freedomes. Take the U.S for example. A millitary state is the direct oposite of a free society.
That's odd. I don't seem to remember Bush ever mentioning freedomes above security in his "national interest" speeches? Care to explain?
I find it funny that the government has to say it is a national interest for you to think it is. The same government you accuse of orchestrating 9/11. WTF is wrong with that?
The French and the Britts faught for their nations sovereignty. What it's government choose to do with it is another matter.
A nations wealth, sovereignty, power and the land it posses is not due to the freedome of it's people. Total freedome for the people would mean that the nation itself would be dissolved. The more freedome the people is given, the weaker the nation. A nation is a whole. It's a body made out of it's people and it's possetions, such as land.
I thought you were a big Bush fan? Do you now think that what Bush is doing to the people of the U.S, in terms of limiting it's peoples freedomes in exchange for "security", is wrong?