Canadian Troops OUT of Afghanistan!
grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
I can turn anything into a CT.
Hell, some guy writes a book of fiction called the Da Vinci Code and the anti Catholics fall all over themselves believing it must be true.
Calgary123, do you honestly expect me to believe that your beliefs are not connected to your philosophical objections to American foreign policy?
On the contrary... it was through much research into these topics over the years that led to my "philisophical" objections to American Policy.... not the other way around.
Calgary123 Calgary123:
On the contrary... it was through much research into these topics over the years that led to my "philisophical" objections to American Policy.... not the other way around.
And that of course is why you hate Harper. I suppose he's involved in this too. I sincerely doubt that you are as objective as you claim.
Further, what could you possilby object to about American foreign policy? They seem to be the only ones with the guts to stand up to the islamofacsists.
Wullu @ Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:14 am
grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
I can turn anything into a CT.
Hell, some guy writes a book of fiction called the Da Vinci Code and the anti Catholics fall all over themselves believing it must be true.
Calgary123, do you honestly expect me to believe that your beliefs are not connected to your philosophical objections to American foreign policy?
Bingo! We have a winner!
grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
Calgary123 Calgary123:
On the contrary... it was through much research into these topics over the years that led to my "philisophical" objections to American Policy.... not the other way around.
And that of course is why you hate Harper. I suppose he's involved in this too. I sincerely doubt that you are as objective as you claim.
Further, what could you possilby object to about American foreign policy? They seem to be the only ones with the guts to stand up to the islamofacsists.
Standing up to 'Terror' does not mean anyone has the right to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people and completly demolish other countries. Anyone who thinks the Americans are doing a good job in this 'War on Terror' are just refusing to watch, read or listen to any news on the 'War on Terror'. It sure is easy to believe what you believe when your head is stuck in the sand, eh prairieboy?
Furhtermore, yes, Harper is part of it. He's a pawn in the bigger picture of everything, which there is no point discussing with you at this time. You haven't even grasped the fact that the earth is warming up yet (Re: Global Warming) let alone global politics. Sheesh.
Wullu @ Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:12 pm
ReOpen911Canada ReOpen911Canada:
Standing up to 'Terror' does not mean anyone has the right to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people and completly demolish other countries.
Hundreds of thousands? Where exactly was this? Is this "hundreds of thousands" the same as that hack Robert Fisk predicted in Afghanistan? You know, from the "harsh Afghan winter"? Of course Fisk forgot that the Afghans had been living there for centuries and had long ago figured out how to survive winter.
Or is the "hundreds of thousands" predicted by the Hussein supporters in Iraq?
Of course neither of these casualty numbers actually occurred. A fact you seem to have missed out on. You were perhaps hoping for these kind of numbers to help prove our point?
Where are the demolished countrys?
grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
Calgary123 Calgary123:
On the contrary... it was through much research into these topics over the years that led to my "philisophical" objections to American Policy.... not the other way around.
And that of course is why you hate Harper. I suppose he's involved in this too. I sincerely doubt that you are as objective as you claim.
Further, what could you possilby object to about American foreign policy? They seem to be the only ones with the guts to stand up to the islamofacsists.
Where have I stated that I "hate" Harper? I actually voted for him in the last election. Does that mean I agree with his foreign policy? No... but don't put words in my mouth.
$1:
Further, what could you possilby object to about American foreign policy? They seem to be the only ones with the guts to stand up to the islamofacsists.
[/quote]

Oh please... where do I even begin. I'll have to take a pass on that question since I don't have enough hours in the day today to even write the first chapter.
And to claim that the Americans have "guts" because they have been killing hundreds of thousands of people over the 4 years in Afghanistan and Iraq is just pure stupidity... unless you are buying into this false "war on terror".... which I'm not.
Remember... it was the Bush administration that created a reason to bomb Afghanistan (there was no ties to 911) and then concoct another doozy with the WMD lies to go into Iraq. It's all about Imperialism and controlling the Middle East. The BS that the government creates that gets peddled on FOX and CNN is just propoganda to keep the sheep supporting the "long war".
Wullu Wullu:
Hundreds of thousands? Where exactly was this? Is this "hundreds of thousands" the same as that hack Robert Fisk predicted in Afghanistan? You know, from the "harsh Afghan winter"? Of course Fisk forgot that the Afghans had been living there for centuries and had long ago figured out how to survive winter.
Or is the "hundreds of thousands" predicted by the Hussein supporters in Iraq?
Of course neither of these casualty numbers actually occurred. A fact you seem to have missed out on. You were perhaps hoping for these kind of numbers to help prove our point?
Where are the demolished countrys?
I suggest you join this world at some point before discussing something my friend. Where are the demolished countries? I mean, come on dude. Iraq is devistated. Lebanon; 4 BILLION dollars in devistation. Do you watch the news? Did you see what those people went back too? Come on!
According to the BBC and, you know, scientists there are over 100, 000 civilians in Iraq alone slaughtered:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm
The truth proves points, not me.
Bodah @ Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:07 pm
grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
Bodah that was brilliant!
Can I have your permission to post it on other internet forums when the tpic comes up?
Again....brilliant.
I copied an a pasted from somewhere else

, so ya absolutely !!!
Wullu @ Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:08 pm
ReOpen911Canada ReOpen911Canada:
Wullu Wullu:
Hundreds of thousands? Where exactly was this? Is this "hundreds of thousands" the same as that hack Robert Fisk predicted in Afghanistan? You know, from the "harsh Afghan winter"? Of course Fisk forgot that the Afghans had been living there for centuries and had long ago figured out how to survive winter.
Or is the "hundreds of thousands" predicted by the Hussein supporters in Iraq?
Of course neither of these casualty numbers actually occurred. A fact you seem to have missed out on. You were perhaps hoping for these kind of numbers to help prove our point?
Where are the demolished countrys?
I suggest you join this world at some point before discussing something my friend. Where are the demolished countries? I mean, come on dude. Iraq is devistated. Lebanon; 4 BILLION dollars in devistation. Do you watch the news? Did you see what those people went back too? Come on!
According to the BBC and, you know, scientists there are over 100, 000 civilians in Iraq alone slaughtered:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stmThe truth proves points, not me.
Iraq is devistated? Got any proof for this massive generalization? Thought not. $4 Billion in damage in Lebanon? Bout the same as you get from a particularly energentic hurricane. Besides, you can have the utterly ineffective Lebanese govt answer to that for not removing hezbollah ( the cause of all the damage in Lebanon ) as they were
required to do by treaty.
I guess in your open minded world you never bothered to read
thispiece by a Lebanese writer that I posted last night. Since I am pretty sure you won't read it this time either, he shows the "devistation" in Beirut confined to two neighbourhoods that hezbollah controls. Try joining this world.
100,000 dead in Iraq? And the Beeb is your source?

You do realize that the vast majority of the deaths in Iraq have been at the hands of Egyptians, Saudis, Jordanians, Syrian etc etc terrorists right?
Bodah @ Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:10 pm
double post
Wullu Wullu:
Iraq is devistated? Got any proof for this massive generalization? Thought not. $4 Billion in damage in Lebanon? Bout the same as you get from a particularly energentic hurricane. Besides, you can have the utterly ineffective Lebanese govt answer to that for not removing hezbollah ( the cause of all the damage in Lebanon ) as they were
required to do by treaty.
I guess in your open minded world you never bothered to read
thispiece by a Lebanese writer that I posted last night. Since I am pretty sure you won't read it this time either, he shows the "devistation" in Beirut confined to two neighbourhoods that hezbollah controls. Try joining this world.
100,000 dead in Iraq? And the Beeb is your source?

You do realize that the vast majority of the deaths in Iraq have been at the hands of Egyptians, Saudis, Jordanians, Syrian etc etc terrorists right?
I'm not doing your homework for you. If you haven't seen pictures of Iraq and the devistation there, it's only because your attention has been turned to Lebanon and Isreal. It also helps if you look for information that's outside of your tiny little niche.
For example, for every 'piece' you read, you should read another, preferably with a different view. For example, try this Blog by a Beirut man. Quite insightful.
http://beirutlive.blogspot.com/
And please, don't even try to convince people that the damage was confined to two NEIGHBORHOODS. They dropped over 100 bombs the last day alone. They've been hammering everything for 33 days and if you believe it was confined to 2 neighborhoods, you're really not worthwhile to waste my time discussing with. Try researching before speaking.
Bodah @ Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:37 pm
Calgary123 Calgary123:
Hence the problem with so many people that are in denial... even faced with an overwhelming argument for 911 being an inside job, we have those that will stick their head in the sand.
Sorry I think you have your head stuck in the sand, there is no overwhelming arguement for 911 being an iside job thats another problem for people that support this theory seem to understand. You all seem to lack a few key traits the rest of us have, comon sense , logic and keeping things simple. If you reach way deep down into that large mass of grey matter incased in your skull you can find these abilities, pull them out and use them.
Instead your "over whelming Arguement" is based on bad science, speculations, coincidences tons of them which prove nothing, quotes from "eye witnesses", misquotes from others and theories, nothing else, you have no evidence, you have no experts related to the fields of which the scholars talk about to come forward and back your claims. Why wouldn't a civil engineer step forward if he believe something hokey happened at WTC 1 & 2, why is it because he doesn't want the fame? money? global recognition for being an expert in his field ? Cover on Time Magazine ? You know why because they believe a combination of planed and fired brought down these buildings, thats why.
Even Noam Chomsky agrees this one is impossible, soley on the fact the amount of people that would of had to be involved to pull it off. Impossible to keep secret and incredible stupid to attempt due to the chances of making a blunder being extremly high especially when its as complicated as you suggest it was.
But this is comon sense and logic , so continue on.
Calgary123 Calgary123:
to simply ask yourself "who benefits" from this event is the first step.
Besides all of the people writing and selling books based on 911 theories not many other people. Since people are dying on both sides I dont think anyone is benefitting from anything, aside from the basic principle when a person is attacked they either go into fight or flight mode. It looks like USA chose to fight, suprising huh ?
I dont mean to be an alarmist, But maybe you may change your tune once there is an attack on Canadian soil, I believe unfortunately its just a matter of time. If that happens who are you going to blame that on disaffected youth ?
Wullu @ Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:02 pm
ReOpen911Canada ReOpen911Canada:
I'm not doing your homework for you. If you haven't seen pictures of Iraq and the devistation there, it's only because your attention has been turned to Lebanon and Isreal. It also helps if you look for information that's outside of your tiny little niche.
So you have nothing. Thought so. I have seen hundreds of pics of Iraq. Any damage done there can be attributed to the terrorists I mentioned before. And even they are not capable of "devistation" on a country wide scale. Germany was devistated, Japan was devistated, Korea was devistated. Iraq has been damaged for sure. Devistated? You need a new dictionary. Preferably one not printed by Hamas and Hezbollah Printers.
ReOpen911Canada ReOpen911Canada:
For example, for every 'piece' you read, you should read another, preferably with a different view. For example, try this Blog by a Beirut man. Quite insightful.
http://beirutlive.blogspot.com/And please, don't even try to convince people that the damage was confined to two NEIGHBORHOODS. They dropped over 100 bombs the last day alone. They've been hammering everything for 33 days and if you believe it was confined to 2 neighborhoods, you're really not worthwhile to waste my time discussing with. Try researching before speaking.
So you did not bother to read it. Imagine that. Oh wait I did imagine it and was proved right.
Why is everytime you start loosing ground in a discussion you state that the opposing poster is no longer worth your time? Hmmm? I fully expect to do as you have in the past and answer in spite of yourself.
Wullu @ Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:32 pm
Oh, ClosedMind911Canada, is this what you mean by the BBC ? That the kind of "balanced" reporting you expect from the Beeb?
Oh, BTW, go to minute 2:30 of her report and see her state that the town has been destroyed. Then go hereto minute 2:30 and watch as the reporter from Sky4 comments that the centre of town is destroyed but the rest is "virtually untouched"
Your glorious BBC caught in yet another lie in support of a terror organization. Well done on picking your sources.
Wullu Wullu:
So you did not bother to read it. Imagine that. Oh wait I did imagine it and was proved right.
Why is everytime you start loosing ground in a discussion you state that the opposing poster is no longer worth your time? Hmmm? I fully expect to do as you have in the past and answer in spite of yourself.
I, unlike you, actually read the sources and links that people provide to me. I bet that you, however, have not clicked on one single piece of information I've shared.
Regardless, this is a pointless personal argument and taking focus from the topic. I'm not here to talk about me or you and please stop judging me or thinking you know my actions.