Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

.. answering the never answered question of what happens when a devoted party hack attemps to defend a flip flopping party leader.

It's a all dodge, Demo Derby tonight on CKA!

   

Yes and its all you. You keep dodging why Harper has flip-flopped and every promise he made.

Ridenhack in full form.

Not a Canadian. Not a supporter of Canada.

Only a supporter of the conservatives. As your pal Stemmer says, a Canadian is an American in training.

Thats a pretty awful thing you believe in.

   

Looks like we got ourselves another classic, made especially grand by the "American in training" line. I guess it's going to take some time to purge the "American bastards" from the rhetoric.
I'm leaving this thread because it's a real lose-lose for the Grits here and it's just not fair anymore.

   

Derby,

Partisan crap aside, let's cut to the chase.

Did Harper try and form a coalition? Yes

Did the Liberals and Dion? Yes

Does it make it right regardless of who did it before? No.

This is about Michael Ignatieff, first supporting the coalition and now coming forth saying that it was a bad idea for Canadian unity.

This is what the topic is about. It's not what "He said/She said" or "Harper did it". Regardless where you stand, left or right, this looks poorly upon Ignatieff.

   

Seems rather fitting for you guys after blowing a few million on adds claiming Iggy was a yank eh?

   

I gave them another $100 today just bvecause I liked where their going.

   

Good for you. Funny that certain CKA posters are not attacking you like they did me.

   

You donate more than me so don't start crying that you're party are victims and folks are kicking your signs over. You said that we spent millions on ads and I'm telling you that I'm supporting those ads because they tell the ugly truth that the Grits and the media don't want told.
.. that said, no one should attack anyone because of their political belief.

   

I'm not crying about donations and your assholes were kicking over posts too.

In fact your guys were cutting break lines but you suddenly claimed it was all "non-political miscreants" eh?

NOW its Lib bad guys ......

   

"quoting" Peter Worthington: "Far from being unappealing, Ignatieff is an attractive guy...he's neither impatient, nor a dope, nor an ideologue -- which is part of the reason why Tories are so frightened of him. In fact, the Tory "attack ads" may win Ignatieff more independent and conservative supporters."

   

Harper tried the coalition gig to oust Martin.. he was the guy who would gladly jump in bed with the Bloc, NDP and or libs if it was the scenario.. any thing to be king of the serfdom. I emailed Iggy last night to get an answer about his stand on the coalition, so waiting for one of his staff to get back to me.

   

And yet, no comment on the topic at hand?

It's a constant game of dodge and distract while ignoring the original topic.

   

I'm done here. I've proved that Iggy was for the coalition and is now against the coalition.
The usual suspects can't change the facts and can only spin the context or distract, and that's all they did.

   

Yeah! This picture is proof, Iggy signed the deal, right!

   

Yep, and you can also prove that Steve was against deficit financing too. Things change, why should we hold Iggy to what he said and not Steve?

   

Previous  1  2  3  4  Next