Yeah, god forbid we had competent folks in charge again.
Though you're probably worried about bigger things, like prisons to deal with that huge increase in unreported crime.
You remember the bitching we heard when left wingers claimed that the majority did not vote for the Conservatives? Well imagine the bitching you are going to here if the Conservatives win the most seats and the Libs try to govern anyway.
So the way this works is that someone who votes for the NDP is really voting for the Liberals? It's not a vote against the Conservatives, it's a vote against the Liberals and the Conservatives. If people are so dead set against the CPC they have a choice to pick a party they think will defeat them at the ballot box. Voting isn't something where you later say,'this is what I really meant', after the fact.
Ugh.
If 30% of people vote Liberal and 30% of people vote NDP and 40% of people vote CPC, the 60% of people who vote Liberal and NDP, together, provided both can agree on how to run a government to the mutual benefit of both parties and their supporters (ie, if they have a lot in common, just like the libs and NDP) can run a government.
Welcome to Canada.
People who think a coalition government is anti-democratic don't know where they live or how their government works.
Ugh,
well in a riding that means that the party with 40% wins the seat. The 60% of the constituents that voted against the candidate don't get to rethink their vote.
Nope. They just get the consolation prize of having their vote count for funding towards the party they voted for.
Unless Harper manages to take that way too, in his transparently self serving manner.
And I'll continue to do so. And if he manages to strip public party funding, I'll vote my legal maximum every year against the conservatives in response.
Given the real costs of running a government, I don't think $2 a vote in funding for political parties to ensure that poor people get their say as much as rich folks is too much to ask. Certainly better than the situation we see down south where corporations are now 'people' as far as political campaigning is concerned.
Harper would feel the same way, if the CPC didn't happen to be the party to benefit from stripping public party funding. But then again, he objected to the senatorial system before appointing more senators than any government in our history and abandoning the electoral senate plan. Harper's no idiot. He's just transparently self serving.
Parties should only be funded by their members, not from government coffers.
Health care should be funded by people who need health care, not government coffers.
You can take that foolish argument as far as you want it to, and it remains foolish all the way through.
Sorry, government is about how to best run a country, not how to best run a country according to those who can pay for the biggest say. It's a shame Canadians seem to be forgetting that.