Is't the time to say good bye to the Queen of England
fixer1 fixer1:
I still see that you are the same old blow hard and that will not change.
And by “blow hard” you mean “ass kicker”, yep, I’m still here and you’re still a stunned dolt.
$1:
“As I said before you are never capable of making any arguments because you are too simple minded”
So says one of the dumbest halfwits to stink up this forum in a long time. Project away, dullard as I whipped you like a rented mule. Remember when you actually thought the Queen owned Crown Corporations? Where’s your defense of that when I blew apart your ignorant prattle? That’s what I thought. Shuffle on, pleb, shuffle on
$1:
“If you want to address me do so with proper links to proved the garbage that you spout here day after day and never get called on”
Huh? Are this friggin’ dense? I USED THE VERY LINK YOU DID, you drip! I actually used wikipedia (against my better judgment, but what better way to rub your stupidity in your face) to counter YOUR wikipedia! If my mine isn’t a proper link, then you’ve just shot yours. Dummy. In fact, I provided another link (and I could provide numerous political science sources too, but they’d just sail over your sloped head), but just for fun and to continue schooling your inbred ass, here’s another,
“Generally speaking, Crown Corporations are companies or enterprises that are owned by the state or government… In contrast, Crown Corporations are owned by the state, and are meant to serve some public interest defined by the government of the day.”
“It is important to remember, however, that this concept of Crown ownership is largely symbolic.
The Canadian Monarch does not personally own state property, nor does he or she actually have a say in how it is used or operated. Instead, state-owned properties, such as Crown Corporations, are managed by the elected governments – be it either the federal or provincial/territorial governments.”www.mapleleafweb.com/features/crown-corporations-canada
OR try this one,
“Crown corporations are distinct legal entities established by the government to pursue public policy and commercial objectives.”
http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/libra ... 0580-e.htmOr you can go back to Historica’s and read the same thing.
YOU ARE WRONG. You’ve provided absolutely NOTHING to substantiate your drippy assertion. I’ve given 4 separate sources that all say the same thing; Crown Corporations are creatures of the sovereign Canadian government. That’s it. You’re an uniformed twit and you don’t know squat about this nation’s politics. Piss off
$1:
“Prove you gum flapping half witted posts or just do all the people here on this board a favout and shut up”
Actually, I’ll shut up when you man the frick up and admit your mistakes. I’ve demonstrated how truly dumb and ignorant you are and all you can do is hypocritically whine about how slow and stunted your intellect is and drone on about such nonsense like the Queen actually owns Crown Corporations, Canada’s not sovereign (I noticed you consistently cower from back this one up, chickensh*t) and presenting ANYTHING even remotely tangible as to how the Queen has demonstrably affected Canadian political affairs negatively in the past 50 years.
You tried to spin it, but you got called out and all you could muster was sorry excuses and infantile projection
$1:
“If you can not debate something then keep quiet little man.”
Practice what you preach, Grampa, because you’re the one the needs the diapers after crapping the bed here.
$1:
“I do not care how long you have been here or how many posts you have made.”
And I don’t care if you’re a decrepit, lonely, dementia-stricken lard ass n00b. You’re still getting your ass handed to you.
$1:
“You are the worst kind of ingnorant person there is.”
So says the f*cktard that can’t spell ignorant.
$1:
“Now aren't you glad I am back?”
Yeah, I missed my punching bag
fixer1 fixer1:
If you like at the link it says that all the crown Corporations are owned by the Crown in name only, which was thwe question in the first place "who owned the crown lands and corporations. But as you and you half witted buddies can nto read and comphrehend, that is your problem. As you have already shown you are just a blowhard who does not have the mental ability to debate with out picking fights. I will not ever give in to your type of person. In fact I would like to trade you for any worth while immigrant, just so it would make my Canada a better place. You are a troll of the worst type and since you have been allowed to b e here and build a post count that means nothing other then you slipp between the tracks. I usually allow for all views in my debates, but I already know your view in things and like I said I dismiss you in all that you say.
I do not use the spell checker and my typing maybe not the best, but I can communicate, and get my point across in a proper manner. Which is more then you can ever say. You have come after all my posts since I called you on the sensless fighting in another thread, and so now I can see you are just revengeful. That makes me very much better then you in just about every way. Like I said you are a little man, and you are only important in your own mind. It is obvious that you have bullied many others here and gotten away with it. I on the other hand have lots of time and will just sit and wiait to cal you on all your misbehaviour. I am surprised that the moderators did not warn you of your behaviour, but I am sure that day will come. As for the other Political science types that were mantioned, I am glad you did show your colours, that way I know to discount most of the views you have as being paid political hacks on this site. It usually would take me longer to recognise that in a site. I have learned very much about many of you. It will be interesting to see just how all this plays out in the next while. Like I said already, I hope the real members here will not be taken aback by anything that has been said by me. I came to debate things in a clear and informed way. It is almost inevitable to come across the idiot crowd who things they own the site and they bully everyone they do not agree with. I would rather just expose these guys for what they are. So if anyone has found any of what I have posted objectionable, then I will apologise, but I hope you will join me in trying to make the rest of these guys tow a better line and make this a better place. Too many self proclaimed gods do not make for a good site.
Dodge!!! Our little satellite-fixer, Kimmy the coward just got beat like a red-headed stepchild. This poor dumb animal has NO IDEA what a crown corporation or what the concept of sovereignty means and instead of addressing the salient issue, he hauls off with some misguided, mangled piece of mush that not only serves notice that he is a massive intellectual coward, but also that he's a whiny hypocrite to boot. You, my cognitively-challenged chimp, just became yet another forum cautionary tale.
And for those keeping track, our little buddy Kimmy here has yet to actually post anything of substance regarding the subject at hand. Oh, he's posts anything in the hopes that it's something, but all he seems capable of doing is projecting his own intellectual shortcomings onto others. It's painfully obvious, and like his life, pitiful
Sorry, Kimmy, but you waded into deeper waters than you could handle and no one here is about to resuscitate you. You're a first-rate ass, a coward, a whiner, a sanctimonious bore and a hypocrite and when all is said and done all your dipwad crying really is is a poorly worded concession speech. You were wrong and you're a loser. Sorry, the truth hurts.
Next time you come on a big-boy thread, try reading up on the topic BEFORE you post lest you appear woefully dumb. Ooops....too late.
There's a corner missing a suck somewhere - go find it.
fixer1 fixer1:
My little pony, who only thinks himself a mustang. As I said earlier you are just not very intelligent at all. In fact you are one of most ill informed people I have come across. The question that started all this was what does the Crown and Monarchy have to do with Canada, and why would I want to change that. I told you the reasons why and I also said about the costs and etc. It was then said that the Crown does not have any standing here in Canada, and I said they do and yes they own all the Crown corporations . Yes our government administers these, but the ownership is the Crown. Just as in all Crown land in Canada. I posted the link and then you and yours tried to make this something else. Which I can see is a popular thing among you when you are losing any arguments. You revert to name calling and now you use my first name and try to call me Kimmy. Never was known by that and never will be. Since you seem to like to google and do things like that please go ahead and do so on my family name and you will find that all people with our surname spelling are related and we are known for many things. Like My brother Retired CEO of Alterna Bank, and all the money we as a famiy raised for prostrate cancer. Over 10 million in total, But yeah we are stupid idiots. Yes I did repair and hack satellites and I did pay a heavy price for that hobby $20,000.00 in fines, but I had to also promise not to hack into stupid little people like you and such. That is why I said go ahead and poke around. You will find thta all of my Family have been big contributors to things and we have all been awarded many things for being so.
Maybe you would like to show us your accomplishments in things. Or is it that you have yet to grow up enough to do so.
But any way that is not what this thread is about, and maybe you should get it back on track and give us all your wisdom why you feel the queen should stay as figurehead of the dominion of Canada. Maybe then you will actually learn to contribute instead of just flapping your gums. Thenand only then a pony like you may one day grow up and be a mustang.
Sorry, Kimmy, I don't care about your background nor do I care about your criminal actives. Thanks for sharing, but i'm not here to be your friend and instead of rambling on about crap no one cares about, why not simply admit you don't squat about Canadian politics and move on? If not, i'll be here to counter each dodge and every insult you hypocritically puke out.
Forum Fans,
All of this started because Kimmy was asked to substantiate his rather intellectually shallow mush with evidence. Kimmy replied with such nonsensical garbage that political scientists weeped accross the nation at the blantant display of ignorance. Kimmy's knows nothing about Canadian poliitical science. Want proof? Check out the thread as his utter idiocy is on public display. Kimmy still thinks he's got something. He's got nothing.
1. "These corporations do not belong to the Queen personally, but to the governments of the respective jurisdictions over which she reigns. Crown corporations operate on a day-to-day basis at arm's length from the government; direct control by government is exerted only over the corporation's budget and the appointment of its chairperson and directors."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_corporation - SAME SITE that Kerry the Wonder Tard used!!!
2. "The Canadian Monarch does not personally own state property, nor does he or she actually have a say in how it is used or operated. Instead, state-owned properties, such as Crown Corporations, are managed by the elected governments – be it either the federal or provincial/territorial governments."
http://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/cr ... ons-canada
3. "Crown Corporation, wholly owned federal or provincial organization, structured like private or independent enterprises."http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0002048
THE QUEEN DOESN'T ACTUALLY OWN THEM!!
Oh...and some personal data of me? Here's a picture of me at work
Brenda @ Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:27 pm

Mustang1 Mustang1:
Oh...and some personal data of me? Here's a picture of me at work

Hey Mustang, How is the new sequel coming along ?
Pimpbrewski Pimpbrewski:
Mustang1 Mustang1:
Oh...and some personal data of me? Here's a picture of me at work

Hey Mustang, How is the new sequel coming along ?

It's awesome. Thank the son of Ra that i contacted Keith Ranvile as he actually told me that Oak Island is the fabled home of the crystal skull. Look for me this summer!
fixer1 fixer1:
I never said the queen owned the crown lands but rather like it says in the link I posted that they are all owned by the monarchy, and is not something that becomes the royals personal property but rather assets of the monarchy and is past on no matter what heirs there were.
They aren’t owned by the monarchy. They are owned by the Canadian government. I noticed you predictably dodged my evidence, so at this point, you’re just posting anything in the hopes it's something. You’re done.
$1:
“Again you try to obcscure the points my little pony. Like I said one day you will grow to understand this. When you teried to personalized me in your posts by calling me Kimmy, I thought I would then just show you that at least I walk the walk and do contribute to the betterment of things and causes in general. That is why I welcomed you to go ahead and google away.”
I didn’t obscure your points, I cracked your ignorance wide open. Rationalize it any way you like, you’ve been schooled. What you can’t seem to fathom is I actually don’t care who you are, I merely made reference to whatever name you offered up publicly. The fact that you think it’s personal is sad because this is merely entertainment for me.
$1:
“I do not see anything you can make claim to ever having made better by your contributions. That shows you just what and where weight of your arguments should carry. Like I said Pony, maybe we nbeed to geld you to make sure your mistake is not in continuing your gene class.”
Eww…with the insults again, huh, hypocrite? You seem to chastise people for a lot of acts you can’t seem to abstain from. That makes you a first-rate hypocrite and it tends to take the sting out of your comments. Perhaps you should take a good long look in the mirror – instead of yelling at it – before commenting on other’s behavior.
$1:
“Like I said before this really started after I reported your rude remarks back at me to the Mods here , in another thread you were hijacking. Then you wanted revenge and followed me to this thread. I do not have any respect for you as a person or what you say you stand for, so when you attack me, expect to get back much more then you give out. I did say to the mods then that you should simply be wared and not banned, but I am not so sure about that now. I will simply make you a deal, to ignore each other and stay away from commenting directly to your or my posts. Then maybe you and I will be able to debate issues instead of personalities. That would seem like a good call from my point of view. I will leave the ball in your court.”
Fine, ignore me, but I don’t answer to the likes of you. Oh…and no mods warned me about anything because I’ve done nothing wrong (well…nothing that you haven’t also committed). Sorry, but your delusions of persecution are just that, delusional. In fact, I was on this thread well before you stumbled on, so again, you’re nothing special. I’ve been on monarchy threads well BEFORE you ever arrived, my chronically challenged chump, so nice try (besides, you’ve yet to DIRECTLY address my points anyway), but you’re really just another n00b here.
Unless you’ve got something tangible to offer or can address my salient points, you’re done here and are free to shuffle off.
Hey Fixer1,
Your knowledge of Canadian government workings and constitutional politics is criminal. Next time you're stealing satellite signals, make sure it includes CPAC.
Damn Kimmy the Konvict! There are people who get away with stealing border sauce at Taco Bell that are more successful criminals than you.
Did you enjoy staying at the Queen's prison? She doesn't own it anymore than she does VIA, but I don't think you know the difference.
fixer1 fixer1:
I am tempted to hack thru to your actual true identity and expose you but I promised the courts I would not do that anymore. I am totally off all probations and while tempting, you are probably not worth the time or effort to do such.
What's with the stalking threats? However rude you feel Dayseed or Mustang1 to be, your behaviour here is far more inappropriate.
ziggy @ Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:59 am
![Eating Popcorn [popcorn]](./images/smilies/popcorn.gif)