Canada Kicks Ass
Reduce spending to kill the deficit

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next



DerbyX @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:29 pm

RUEZ RUEZ:
Scape Scape:
So that 10 billion surplus Harper pissed away in 1 fucking term was a good idea?

I love it when you guys use that term pissed away. I guess giving people their money back is considered pissed away to a socialist.


Then this massive conservative demanded deficit means every tax payer actually owes money right? :roll:

THINK before you post will you.

   



RUEZ @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:31 pm

DerbyX DerbyX:
Then this massive coalition demanded deficit means every tax payer actually owes money right? :roll:

THINK before you post will you.

Fixed that for you, since you're in denial.

   



DerbyX @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:32 pm

Tman1 Tman1:
When did Canada start choosing its leaders based on competence levels? Isn't it was Ontario and Quebec wants first, level of leadership second?


No. We are no different the any other province. Its just that by virtue of population we have the most seats.

In fact Ontario is underrepresented but Alberta feels it should dictate.

Ontario votes no different the Saskatchewan. We just has a far larger population and seat count.

   



DerbyX @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:34 pm

RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Then this massive conservative demanded deficit means every tax payer actually owes money right? :roll:

THINK before you post will you.

Fixed that for you, since you're in denial.


The only people crying for massive government spending is you cons.

You certainly aren;t bitching about it.

Face it. Your buddy harper put us 30 billion in debt because of the demands you put on him.

I certainly didn't.

I voted Liberal.

We cut the deficit and debt. :lol:

   



mtbr @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:35 pm

DerbyX DerbyX:
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Then this massive conservative demanded deficit means every tax payer actually owes money right? :roll:

THINK before you post will you.

Fixed that for you, since you're in denial.


The only people crying for massive government spending is you cons.

You certainly aren;t bitching about it.

Face it. Your buddy harper put us 30 billion in debt because of the demands you put on him.

I certainly didn't.

I voted Liberal.

We cut the deficit and debt. :lol:


and had unemployment rates as high as they are now :P

even though there wasn't a Global recession :lol:

   



RUEZ @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:36 pm

DerbyX DerbyX:
The only people crying for massive government spending is you cons.

You certainly aren;t bitching about it.

Face it. Your buddy harper put us 30 billion in debt because of the demands you put on him.

I certainly didn't.

I voted Liberal.

We cut the deficit and debt. :lol:
Your coalition wanted this and you got it. Suck it up.

   



DerbyX @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:37 pm

RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
The only people crying for massive government spending is you cons.

You certainly aren;t bitching about it.

Face it. Your buddy harper put us 30 billion in debt because of the demands you put on him.

I certainly didn't.

I voted Liberal.

We cut the deficit and debt. :lol:
Your coalition wanted this and you got it. Suck it up.


No. You cons wanted this. You people always think a massive government is the answer.

You cons voted in Harper. You cons are responsible for him.

'nuff said.

   



DerbyX @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:39 pm

mtbr mtbr:

and had unemployment rates as high as they are now :P

even though there wasn't a Global recession :lol:


Republican in the white house and a Conservative in Ottawa.

Its no wonder things went south. :lol:

   



Thanos @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:45 pm

Surpluses are a sign of a government that's still taxing too much. If you're getting money back on your tax return it only really means that the government is giving back to you something that they never should have taken so much of in the first place. A surplus follows the same principle. Some might look at one as a sign of healthy and balanced government tax-and-spend. It's not. It's just another sign of bureacratic mentality that says what you earn belongs to them first and to you last.

   



Kerozine @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:46 pm

RUEZ RUEZ:
Your coalition wanted this and you got it. Suck it up.

How is the coalition to blame for this? :|

   



Tman1 @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:49 pm

They made Harper more popular.

   



Kerozine @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:52 pm

Tman1 Tman1:
They made Harper more popular.

He should call another election in the hopes of obtaining a majority government then. :lol:

   



RUEZ @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:55 pm

Kerozine Kerozine:
RUEZ RUEZ:
Your coalition wanted this and you got it. Suck it up.

How is the coalition to blame for this? :|

Serious?

   



DerbyX @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:57 pm

Thanos Thanos:
Surpluses are a sign of a government that's still taxing too much. If you're getting money back on your tax return it only really means that the government is giving back to you something that they never should have taken so much of in the first place. A surplus follows the same principle. Some might look at one as a sign of healthy and balanced government tax-and-spend. It's not. It's just another sign of bureacratic mentality that says what you earn belongs to them first and to you last.


Only if you also believe that a deficit is a sign of too little taxation.

As long as we are in debt then any surplus should go to debt repayment.

   



Lemmy @ Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:58 pm

[popcorn]

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next