Canada Kicks Ass
Google this

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next



PluggyRug @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:56 am

gideon gideon:
hamiltonguyo hamiltonguyo:
That said...America should not alone decide that they want to blow up lets say Mozambique because they feel like it based on some dubious intelligence.


We can and we will.

Try and stop us, kiddo.

You are completely powerless, as is your country. Face facts, if you want to have some say in how the world is run you will need to build up your military again. Might makes right.


If someone pops a paper bag behind your head...do you shit yourself?

   



SwampoO @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:56 am

gideon gideon:
hamiltonguyo hamiltonguyo:
That said...America should not alone decide that they want to blow up lets say Mozambique because they feel like it based on some dubious intelligence.


We can and we will.

Try and stop us, kiddo.

You are completely powerless, as is your country. Face facts, if you want to have some say in how the world is run you will need to build up your military again. Might makes right.


your comments are uneducated and imature, you should consider building relationships before breaking them down.

As for your signature, "down with islam 3000 americans can't be wrong" well there's 295,734,134 people in the USA right now, if you do the math thats 1 in 98 000 people that can't be wrong... pretty spread out if you ask me, heck more people then that voted for Bush and they were way off.

   



tyman @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:14 pm

Holyshit no wonder your countrys screwed up. Maybe you should police your own country, your own people kill more of your own than any other perceived threat out there.

   



gideon @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:05 pm

SwampoO SwampoO:
your comments are uneducated and imature, you should consider building relationships before breaking them down.


America builds relationships with countries with whom she shares mutual interests and goals.

If you are not committed to fighting the war on terror we do not need you.

It's that simple.

$1:
As for your signature, "down with islam 3000 americans can't be wrong" well there's 295,734,134 people in the USA right now, if you do the math thats 1 in 98 000 people that can't be wrong... pretty spread out if you ask me, heck more people then that voted for Bush and they were way off.


Short memory, eh?

The 3000 Americans who perished on 9/11 have not died in vain.

Never Forget.

   



gideon @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:09 pm

tyman tyman:
Holyshit no wonder your countrys screwed up. Maybe you should police your own country, your own people kill more of your own than any other perceived threat out there.


No, "my own people" (members of the suburban American middle class) have a very low murder rate.

Most murders are committed by lower class Americans, and most murder victims are lower class Americans.

If they choose to destroy their own communities and kill each other off with guns and drugs, that is their own problem - not mine.

The rest of us don't seem to have a problem living in peace.

   



VitaminC @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:30 pm

Going back to google and child porn.

This thing that the Bush gov't has nothing to do with investigating porn.

If a law enforcement agency is investigating a case of child porn and it lead them to google, then google will fully co-operate. Their policy states that they will co-operate with law enforcement......

The Bush gov't does not investigate or fight child porn. They make laws. They want to get info from google to use as a political tool to argue the merits of a new law they are proposing. They want the statistics of how many people search google for certain words in order to make the case for new anti-porn laws.

Guess what, child porn is already against the law. That means that new anti-porn laws have nothing to with child porn, and everything to do with adult porn......

This has nothing to do with investigating child porn or any other crime.

   



fatbasturd @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:36 pm

gideon gideon:
tyman tyman:
Holyshit no wonder your countrys screwed up. Maybe you should police your own country, your own people kill more of your own than any other perceived threat out there.


No, "my own people" (members of the suburban American middle class) have a very low murder rate.

Most murders are committed by lower class Americans, and most murder victims are lower class Americans.

If they choose to destroy their own communities and kill each other off with guns and drugs, that is their own problem - not mine.

The rest of us don't seem to have a problem living in peace.

You know I was going to type out this really long well thought out reply.
Quite frankly you are not worth the effort , but they say a picture is worth a thousand words...so I want you to focus on the last word in this picture because it fits you .....thank you for your time Fat

   



stratos @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:48 pm

I find it odd that someone so pro american like you gideon is willing to give up rights that our country has fought for. Freedom from unreasonable searchs is part of the constitution. If you want to give up your rights go to... i dont know Iran, N. Korea, China....

As for me if the gov. has no evidence that can be presented to a Judge who then gives the feds. the right to search said persons searches on the internet they have no bussiness searching mine, yours or anyones actions.

If they think someone is downloading kid porn they should get a warrent and take the persons computer and have an expert go over the harddrive and get the prof.

But with your logic i'll say this: because you might have commited a crime that i'm completely unaware of I think the gov. should come to your house search it document everything and keep files on you, your family and all actions done in your house. Every time you sleep, eat, make love, shit what ever it will now be put into a gov. document. Ohhh and some time just for the fun of it I'll let the gov. put you in jail with no charges.

Watch what you say here gedion you keep talking about kiddy porn it might triger an investigation on you and charges brought aginst you just for typeing the words kid and porn in the same thread.

   



stratos @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:50 pm

Then again if what i typed is to much for your brain to handle read what fatbasturd said before me. That works also.

Fatbasturd........................ [BB] have a drink on me and dont forget to flip off the idiot who wants to take your rights away from you in the name of some great idea or cause.

   



tyman @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:58 pm

i think you missed the point Gideon, their still your people your country. You cant segregate yourself.

No, "my own people" (members of the suburban American middle class) have a very low murder rate.

Most murders are committed by lower class Americans, and most murder victims are lower class Americans.

If they choose to destroy their own communities and kill each other off with guns and drugs, that is their own problem - not mine.

The rest of us don't seem to have a problem living in peace.[/quote]

   



Thematic-Device @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:07 pm

gideon gideon:
hamiltonguyo hamiltonguyo:
actually it is too easy too abuse WAY to easy... I can see if they set of fake child porn sites as a sting but not doing something like this....its like they're attempting to wiretap everyone except with the internet...


No, they're merely asking for a set of records from google. Not the whole internet. And they are targeting a specific set of offenders, who engage in activities that are universally despised.

I fail to see the problem here.


No they're filing a subpoena against google because they don't have any evidence to support a law which has been struck down. They're grasping at straws and the subpoena should be rejected. Google is not a part of the civil suit and there is no authority for them to demand this information.

VitaminC VitaminC:
...
This has nothing to do with investigating child porn or any other crime.


exactly

   



gideon @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:09 pm

stratos stratos:
I find it odd that someone so pro american like you gideon is willing to give up rights that our country has fought for. Freedom from unreasonable searchs is part of the constitution.


Searching google's records for child pornographers is not unreasonable in any sense of the word. Nobody (credible) has ever fought for the rights of pedophiles.

$1:
But with your logic i'll say this: because you might have commited a crime that i'm completely unaware of I think the gov. should come to your house search it document everything and keep files on you, your family and all actions done in your house.


But I never said that... you did. A classic straw man argument. I have never endorsed warrantless searches of suspected child pornographers' residences.

   



gideon @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:13 pm

tyman tyman:
i think you missed the point Gideon, their still your people your country. You cant segregate yourself.


Of course I can. Most Americans have zero sympathy for the criminal lower class, and rightly so.

There are bad apples in every crowd. Canada has many of its own, as does europe. Claiming that the dregs of society represent mainstream America is disingenuous at best.

   



stratos @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:32 pm

Searching google's records for child pornographers is not unreasonable in any sense of the word. Nobody (credible) has ever fought for the rights of pedophiles.


By searching all of googles records for unnamed person or persons record of what they searched is not a legal warrent. Just like with my example of your house being searched and documented and periodicly recorded. You tell me its ok for them to look into what i did on google on any certin day with out even haveing cause. That is called illegale search and seisure, last time I checked it was in the constitution that the gov. was not allowed to do such a thing.

You might like to have everyone snooping into your searches online but then again i'm sure you dont have much of a problem with people invadeing your privacy for no other reason than ohhh were just doing a random search of your stuff. No worries were here for just one reason to see if your a child molester. I'm sure you would feel real comfortable with haveing the cops go through your house every now and then.

Now if you some how still think that i'm defending a child molester your a sic idiot. What i'm defending is my right not to have an illegal search and seizure done on me. What i'm argueing for is the upholding of my constituinal rights. What your argueing for is the throwing away of my rights.
So if you feel its ok to trash can my rights i'll feel just as free to invade your home and do a search of any dam thing i want.

Comfortable with that?

   



stratos @ Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:34 pm

gideon gideon:
tyman tyman:
i think you missed the point Gideon, their still your people your country. You cant segregate yourself.


Of course I can. Most Americans have zero sympathy for the criminal lower class, and rightly so.

There are bad apples in every crowd. Canada has many of its own, as does europe. Claiming that the dregs of society represent mainstream America is disingenuous at best.


Are we to assume you have sympathy for the upper criminal class. What was termed white collar crimes. I'm sure a lot of enron employees and customers would love to tell you how it feels to be ripped off by rich pukes getting richer through funky accounting methods.

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next