Canada Kicks Ass
Coulter Coulter Coulter - Enough Already.....

REPLY

Previous  1 ... 17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next



Proculation @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:08 pm

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Proculation Proculation:
The thing is didn't wake up one morning saying "ok, i'll go make a speech in 3 canadian universities and piss people off !"

She was invited to make a conference speech.

We can disapprove what she says but censuring her in a free country like Canada is very wrong.

WHO THE HELL CENSORED HER.


Was she able to speak ? No.

Hundreds of people were waiting for her speech but thousands prevented her to even get into the building. I call that censorship.

   



PublicAnimalNo9 @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:22 pm

Proculation Proculation:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Proculation Proculation:
The thing is didn't wake up one morning saying "ok, i'll go make a speech in 3 canadian universities and piss people off !"

She was invited to make a conference speech.

We can disapprove what she says but censuring her in a free country like Canada is very wrong.

WHO THE HELL CENSORED HER.


Was she able to speak ? No.

Hundreds of people were waiting for her speech but thousands prevented her to even get into the building. I call that censorship.

I call that the right to assemble and protest.
Let me ask you Proc. Let's say for sake of argument, yer having a little get together and I'm invited. But when I show up, I continually insult you, your friends, your home, your race, creed or colour, are you going to let me stay and keep speaking my mind in YOUR home? I'd also bet your friends would be standing up for you as well.
Well, Coulter has a history of shitting on Canada and Canadians(without having the tiniest clue what she's talking about) and enough people decided they didn't want her shitting in OUR house.

   



sandorski @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:27 pm

Proculation Proculation:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Proculation Proculation:
The thing is didn't wake up one morning saying "ok, i'll go make a speech in 3 canadian universities and piss people off !"

She was invited to make a conference speech.

We can disapprove what she says but censuring her in a free country like Canada is very wrong.

WHO THE HELL CENSORED HER.


Was she able to speak ? No.

Hundreds of people were waiting for her speech but thousands prevented her to even get into the building. I call that censorship.


She Censored herself.

   



Gunnair @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:28 pm

For all those pissing themselves over censorship on a site that regularly censors members, I'm waiting for the moral outrage on the mods to kick in.

   



BluesBud @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:36 pm

Without saying a word I think this says it all.
Image

   



fifeboy @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:37 pm

Proculation Proculation:

Was she able to speak ? No.

Hundreds of people were waiting for her speech but thousands prevented her to even get into the building. I call that censorship.


And some of them were shouting...and making faces and...and...being noisy! It was sooooo scary!

   



Gunnair @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:38 pm

BluesBud BluesBud:
Without saying a word I think this says it all.
Image


or...

Image

   



Proculation @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:44 pm

It's still censorship and that's preventing free speech. Preventing free speech is something that can't be tolerated in Canada, even if you don't like what the speech is about.

Here's a good opinion I found on the subject from a Professor of Law of U Montreal:

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/hec ... story.html

   



Proculation @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:47 pm

You have the right to protest a speech but when your protest PREVENTS the speech to happen, that's censorship and against freedom of speech.

   



Proculation @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:51 pm

$1:
I call that the right to assemble and protest.
Let me ask you Proc. Let's say for sake of argument, yer having a little get together and I'm invited. But when I show up, I continually insult you, your friends, your home, your race, creed or colour, are you going to let me stay and keep speaking my mind in YOUR home? I'd also bet your friends would be standing up for you as well.
Well, Coulter has a history of shitting on Canada and Canadians(without having the tiniest clue what she's talking about) and enough people decided they didn't want her shitting in OUR house.


That's non-comparable. She was invited to make a public speech in a public university.
Like I said, Voltaire said: "I disapprove of what you say but I will fight to death for your right to say it".

   



fifeboy @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Proculation Proculation:
It's still censorship and that's preventing free speech. Preventing free speech is something that can't be tolerated in Canada, even if you don't like what the speech is about.

Here's a good opinion I found on the subject from a Professor of Law of U Montreal:

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/hec ... story.html
On Fox they were crowing about how Ahmadinejad was let speak at Columbia. There were thousands of protesters there too, some shouting and carrying signs on the ends of big sticks that could have been used as weapons and he had the balls to go ahead with his speech. She was not stopped from speaking, she saw an opportunity to make hay against her favorite enemy, Canadians.

   



Gunnair @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:57 pm

Proculation Proculation:
You have the right to protest a speech but when your protest PREVENTS the speech to happen, that's censorship and against freedom of speech.


Quite drinking Coulter's kool-aid. She and her advisors wussed out because they saw a great political opportunity that her hillbilly supporters would buy into on forums across the continent.

   



Proculation @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:05 pm

fifeboy fifeboy:
Proculation Proculation:
It's still censorship and that's preventing free speech. Preventing free speech is something that can't be tolerated in Canada, even if you don't like what the speech is about.

Here's a good opinion I found on the subject from a Professor of Law of U Montreal:

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/hec ... story.html
On Fox they were crowing about how Ahmadinejad was let speak at Columbia. There were thousands of protesters there too, some shouting and carrying signs on the ends of big sticks that could have been used as weapons and he had the balls to go ahead with his speech. She was not stopped from speaking, she saw an opportunity to make hay against her favorite enemy, Canadians.


Yes because that particular censorship, "heckler's veto", was ruled against free speech in the US.

I don't think we have that court ruling here in Canada.

   



Proculation @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:08 pm

Gunnair Gunnair:
Proculation Proculation:
You have the right to protest a speech but when your protest PREVENTS the speech to happen, that's censorship and against freedom of speech.


Quite drinking Coulter's kool-aid. She and her advisors wussed out because they saw a great political opportunity that her hillbilly supporters would buy into on forums across the continent.


I'm not drinking anything. I have never heard or seen her since I don't watch american news. I barely know her.

I'm just saying that's wrong. You may think we can censor people because we don't like what they say but i'm strong defensor of free speech and i'm against that.

   



Gunnair @ Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:10 pm

Proculation Proculation:
Gunnair Gunnair:
Proculation Proculation:
You have the right to protest a speech but when your protest PREVENTS the speech to happen, that's censorship and against freedom of speech.


Quite drinking Coulter's kool-aid. She and her advisors wussed out because they saw a great political opportunity that her hillbilly supporters would buy into on forums across the continent.


I'm not drinking anything. I have never heard or seen her since I don't watch american news. I barely know her.

I'm just saying that's wrong. You may think we can censor people because we don't like what they say but i'm strong defensor of free speech and i'm against that.


Racists often are.

   



REPLY

Previous  1 ... 17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next