Canada Kicks Ass
'Facebook will never sell your information' said Zuckerberg

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next



martin14 @ Thu Mar 29, 2018 10:51 pm

BRAH BRAH:
Obama also used Facebook to connect to voters in 2008, 2012.


I remember they used to brag about Obama being all cool n sheeet with da phone.




Thanos Thanos:
Yeah, but it wasn't until 2016 that Vladimir Putin used FB to connect to American voters. :|


Slurp, slurp, slurp. :roll:

   



Thanos @ Thu Mar 29, 2018 11:04 pm

Hey! Those are the exact same sounds Sean Hannity makes when he has Trump's li'l cheeto wedged in his mouth. 8O

   



BRAH @ Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:12 am

martin14 martin14:
BRAH BRAH:
Obama also used Facebook to connect to voters in 2008, 2012.


I remember they used to brag about Obama being all cool n sheeet with da phone.

Obama used a BlackBerry at least it wasn't an IPhone.

Thanos Thanos:
Yeah, but it wasn't until 2016 that Vladimir Putin used FB to connect to American voters. :|

To bad Ted Kennedy didn't have a smartphone to connect to Uber.

   



BartSimpson @ Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:31 am

Thousands of Facebook employees react with anger at company traitors after 'ugly' leaked memo from boss Andrew Bosworth justifies the firm's growth at ALL costs

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z5BFLTHDJM

Here's the sekret Facebook memo in question:

$1:
The Ugly

We talk about the good and the bad of our work often. I want to talk about the ugly.

We connect people.

That can be good if they make it positive. Maybe someone finds love. Maybe it even saves the life of someone on the brink of suicide.

So we connect more people

That can be bad if they make it negative. Maybe it costs a life by exposing someone to bullies. Maybe someone dies in a terrorist attack coordinated on our tools.

And still we connect people.

The ugly truth is that we believe in connecting people so deeply that anything that allows us to connect more people more often is *de facto* good. It is perhaps the only area where the metrics do tell the true story as far as we are concerned.

That isn't something we are doing for ourselves. Or for our stock price (ha!). It is literally just what we do. We connect people. Period.

That's why all the work we do in growth is justified. All the questionable contact importing practices. All the subtle language that helps people stay searchable by friends. All of the work we do to bring more communication in. The work we will likely have to do in China some day. All of it.

The natural state of the world is not connected. It is not unified. It is fragmented by borders, languages, and increasingly by different products. The best products don't win. The ones everyone use win.

I know a lot of people don't want to hear this. Most of us have the luxury of working in the warm glow of building products consumers love. But make no mistake, growth tactics are how we got here.

If you joined the company because it is doing great work, that's why we get to do that great work. We do have great products but we still wouldn't be half our size without pushing the envelope on growth. Nothing makes Facebook as valuable as having your friends on it, and no product decisions have gotten as many friends on as the ones made in growth. Not photo tagging. Not news feed. Not messenger. Nothing.

In almost all of our work, we have to answer hard questions about what we believe. We have to justify the metrics and make sure they aren't losing out on a bigger picture. But connecting people. That's our imperative. Because that's what we do. We connect people.

Andrew Bosworth's reaction a year later after the memo was leaked

I'm feeling a little heartbroken tonight.

I had multiple reporters reach out today with different stories containing leaks of internal information.

In response to one of the leaks I have chosen to delete a post I made a couple of years ago about our mission to connect people and the ways we grow. While I won't go quite as far as to call it a straw man, that post was definitely designed to provoke a response. It served effectively as a call for people across the company to get involved in the debate about how we conduct ourselves amid the ever changing mores of the online community. The post was of no particular consequence in and of itself, it was the comments that were impressive. A conversation over the course of years that was alive and well even going into this week.

That conversation is now gone. And I won't be the one to bring it back for fear it will be misunderstood by a broader population that doesn't have full context on who we are and how we work.

This is the very real cost of leaks. We had a sensitive topic that we could engage on openly and explore even bad ideas, even if just to eliminate them. If we have to live in fear that even our bad ideas will be exposed then we won't explore them or understand them as such, we won't clearly label them as such, we run a much greater risk of stumbling on them later. Conversations go underground or don't happen at all. And not only are we worse off for it, so are the people who use our products.

   



BRAH @ Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:53 pm

Are you ready? Here is all the data Facebook and Google have on you

$1:
Want to freak yourself out? I’m going to show just how much of your information the likes of Facebook and Google store about you without you even realizing it.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/28/all-the-data-facebook-google-has-on-you-privacy?CMP=share_btn_tw
___________________________

Edward Snowden was right.

   



martin14 @ Mon Apr 02, 2018 10:50 am

EXCLUSIVE: 'HYPOCRITE!' Mark Zuckerberg slammed by photojournalist who was escorted to Facebook HQ and berated for breaching the CEO's privacy after taking pictures of him cleaning up his dog's poop on a public street

Photo-journalist Nick Stern was escorted to Facebook headquarters by security guards after he took photos of Mark Zuckerberg cleaning up after his dog in 2011
He told DailyMail.com he was told Zuckerberg's life was private and had that he had 'no right pursuing him or stories about him to publish'
'It's ironic that Zuckerberg will go to such extraordinary lengths to protect his own privacy - when the privacy of millions of people doesn't appear to have been high on his priority list,' he said
The 50-year-old, who lives in Los Angeles, had traveled to Palo Alto in April, 2011 to profile Zuckerberg, 33, when he first became a public figure
The world's youngest billionaire at the time was seen whipping out a plastic bag, crouching down and cleaning up his new puppy Beast's mess near his home
Stern said the way the meeting was conducted left him feeling 'intimidated' - although no direct threats were made


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z5BXSRGyFQ

   



DrCaleb @ Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:58 pm

Do as I say, not as I doo-doo?

   



martin14 @ Wed Apr 04, 2018 9:47 pm

He whored out every pixel you made for more money.


Mark Zuckerberg admits Facebook scans the contents of ALL your private Messenger texts in the latest blow to the scandal hit firm

Facebook checks messages to ensure they are in line with community standards
Zuckerberg confirmed the policy of scanning texts during a podcast interview
It sparked further privacy concerns in the wake of Cambridge Analytica scandal
The consulting firm bought data from 50 million unsuspecting Facebook users


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z5Blob88B4

   



Thanos @ Wed Apr 04, 2018 11:04 pm

"Facebook will NEVER sell your information" - means about as much coming from a billionaire like Zuckerberg as "I will never lie to you" did from that other feller at the last RNC. :lol:

   



BRAH @ Thu Apr 05, 2018 4:34 am

Zuckerberg says most Facebook users should assume they have had their public info scraped

$1:
Facebook said Wednesday that it believes most of its users who had a specific search function enabled have had their profile data scraped by third parties.

"We've seen some scraping," CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on a call with reporters. "I would assume if you had that setting turned on that someone at some point has access to your public information in some way," he said.

The setting Zuckerberg referred to is one where users let other users search for them by e-mail address or phone number instead of by name.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/04/facebook-most-people-could-have-had-their-public-profile-scraped.html
___________________

The real threat to Democracy is tech companies.
____________________

Facebook Scans the Photos and Links You Send on Messenger
$1:
Facebook Inc. scans the links and images that people send each other on Facebook Messenger, and reads chats when they’re flagged to moderators, making sure the content abides by the company’s rules. If it doesn’t, it gets blocked or taken down.

The company confirmed the practice after an interview published earlier this week with Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg raised questions about Messenger’s practices and privacy. Zuckerberg told Vox’s Ezra Klein a story about receiving a phone call related to ethnic cleansing in Myanmar. Facebook had detected people trying to send sensational messages through the Messenger app, he said

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-04/facebook-scans-what-you-send-to-other-people-on-messenger-app
____________________

Facebook owns WhatsApp Messenger so it has to be happening on there too.

   



DrCaleb @ Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:41 am

BRAH BRAH:
The real threat to Democracy is tech companies.


Why? They only have the information people give them. What happened to 'personal responsibility' all of a sudden?

Facebook can't see what school I went to, because I didn't tell them. They can't sell my Messenger texts, because I've never used it. They can't run face recognition on my picture, because I've never uploaded one of myself, and I refused to acknowledge it if anyone else tagged me in their pictures.

The only threat to democracy is people's apathy.

   



PluggyRug @ Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:22 am

DrCaleb DrCaleb:
BRAH BRAH:
The real threat to Democracy is tech companies.


Why? They only have the information people give them. What happened to 'personal responsibility' all of a sudden?

Facebook can't see what school I went to, because I didn't tell them. They can't sell my Messenger texts, because I've never used it. They can't run face recognition on my picture, because I've never uploaded one of myself, and I refused to acknowledge it if anyone else tagged me in their pictures.

The only threat to democracy is people's apathy.


Exactly! Good summation Doc.

   



BartSimpson @ Thu Apr 05, 2018 9:46 am

DrCaleb DrCaleb:
They only have the information people give them.


True.

   



DrCaleb @ Thu Apr 05, 2018 10:07 am

PluggyRug PluggyRug:

Exactly! Good summation Doc.


[B-o]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
They only have the information people give them.


True.


Just as an exercise, I went to Brah's article on what Google knows about me. It was mostly blank, and the rest was wrong. It thought I was a 70 year old Female (which explains a lot) as advertising went. It got most of my interests wrong. My Youtube history was blank. My photo history was blank. Locations I've visited, was blank. (Mainly because I turn off location services, I don't tie my phone to any Google or Facebook accounts, and also because I don't use my cell phone to surf the internet. Ever!)

If you give no information, you can't be profiled, pigeonholed, folded, stuffed onto an envelope and filed away.

   



martin14 @ Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:34 pm

'It was my mistake and I'm sorry.' Mark Zuckerberg grovels in written statement to Congress before he is questioned about data-harvesting scandal

The Facebook CEO said he was 'sorry' and it was 'my mistake' that led to breach
The Facebook CEO testifies to congressional committees Tuesday and Wednesday
He said there was 'no question' Facebook should have spotted Russian interference sooner
He has been under fire since revelations Cambridge Analytica was able to scrape data for tens of millions of users from the site
Zuckerberg told reporters he accepted blame for the leak
He is being coached by a team of experts and a former George W. Bush aide
Facebook has given $7 million in campaign contributions to lawmakers since 2007
Facebook suspended another data firm, CubeYou, over how it scraped data from user surveys


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z5CD2mPe8b



$1:
Facebook has given $7 million in campaign contributions to lawmakers since 2007, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

That includes $985,000 to members of the three committees that will interrogate Zuckerberg Tuesday and Wednesday.


Well that should give him some nice easy questions to answer.
And no prosecution.

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next