Canada Kicks Ass
Layton says Canada should do more to protect Arctic sovereig

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 ... 11  Next



Mustang1 @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:10 pm

Scape Scape:
Your comparing apples and oranges EB. Your saying someone that serves is worth more to the country than someone that doesn't. You not comparing net worth or faith your comparing political equity.


Exactly. No one is doubting that soldiers and the military provide a vital contribution, but i'm not about to judge and form conclusions about someone's patriotism simply on the basis of their vocation. It's insulting, offensive and it defies common sense. I'm not sure how an engineer is somehow a "lesser person" because he/she choses that profession versus a member of the Canadian Armed Forces? Why even begin to evaluate it?

   



EyeBrock @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:12 pm

Mustang1 Mustang1:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
Mustang1 Mustang1:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
. Regardless I think our nation owes more of a debt to the guys in Helmand than a TTC driver. No scorn intended but I can you, Dayseed and Mustang think there is no difference.


Be very carefull here - i never once claimed that we don't owe a great deal to our fallen heroes. What I objected to was the notion that they somehow supersede other members of society in therms of patriotism, citizenry and superiority. I never ranked them - i believe each person can contribute to Canada's success and i'm not about arbitrarily rank them under such stacked criteria.

You got a problem with my points then quote in context and have at it.


Oh do chill.

No, I disagree with your opinion as you disagree with mine.

There only one line eh?


Actually, don't tell me to chill and I won't tell you to smarten up.

I find your opinion incorrect, misguided, arrogant and insulting. Sorry, but it's wrong.

The one line? Yep. It was a cheap shot to somehow misrepresent my position. I took offense to bush league tactics. I notice you're not offering up an explanation or retraction.


Oh stop being so pompous.

You are not going to change my views on this. Any further 'debate' is quite futile.

By the way, it was a cheap shot at your sometime verbose posts. I apologise.

   



Mustang1 @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:21 pm

EyeBrock EyeBrock:
Mustang1 Mustang1:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
Mustang1 Mustang1:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
. Regardless I think our nation owes more of a debt to the guys in Helmand than a TTC driver. No scorn intended but I can you, Dayseed and Mustang think there is no difference.


Be very carefull here - i never once claimed that we don't owe a great deal to our fallen heroes. What I objected to was the notion that they somehow supersede other members of society in therms of patriotism, citizenry and superiority. I never ranked them - i believe each person can contribute to Canada's success and i'm not about arbitrarily rank them under such stacked criteria.

You got a problem with my points then quote in context and have at it.


Oh do chill.

No, I disagree with your opinion as you disagree with mine.

There only one line eh?


Actually, don't tell me to chill and I won't tell you to smarten up.

I find your opinion incorrect, misguided, arrogant and insulting. Sorry, but it's wrong.

The one line? Yep. It was a cheap shot to somehow misrepresent my position. I took offense to bush league tactics. I notice you're not offering up an explanation or retraction.


Oh stop being so pompous.

You are not going to change my views on this. Any further 'debate' is quite futile.

By the way, it was a cheap shot at your sometime verbose posts. I apologise.


How exactly am i being pretentious when your casting judgments on vocations? I simply find it difficult to dismiss people's level of citizenry based solely on their job description.

And this "debate" as such isn't one as it assumes that your opinion counts for anything more than subjective beliefs. Are you honestly under the misguided notion that you can quantify "patriotism"? Again, it's an blatant advocacy of arbitrary superiority based solely on the idea that ONE social role outweights ALL others. Sorry, not buying it.

In regards to my alleged "verbose" posts, i'd say the last few were decidedly succinct, but apology accepted.

   



Dayseed @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:24 pm

That's the whole point that I was trying to make. Patriotism and value as a Canadian are more than simply a profession. Timothy McVeigh must be one hell of an American, afterall, he was in the service. Ditto Lee Harvey Oswald, a former Marine who defected to the Soviet Union AND killed Kennedy...why aren't they handing out LHO coins on Independence Day? According to your juevenile categorizing, these two are better Americans than Thomas Jefferson or Benjamin Franklin.

If you want to judge the "Canadianess" of various Canadians, be my guest, but their vocation shouldn't be the sole criterion, lest you end up with the above examples of sheer stupidity.

   



EyeBrock @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:46 pm

Mustang1 Mustang1:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
Mustang1 Mustang1:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
Mustang1 Mustang1:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
. Regardless I think our nation owes more of a debt to the guys in Helmand than a TTC driver. No scorn intended but I can you, Dayseed and Mustang think there is no difference.


Be very carefull here - i never once claimed that we don't owe a great deal to our fallen heroes. What I objected to was the notion that they somehow supersede other members of society in therms of patriotism, citizenry and superiority. I never ranked them - i believe each person can contribute to Canada's success and i'm not about arbitrarily rank them under such stacked criteria.

You got a problem with my points then quote in context and have at it.


Oh do chill.

No, I disagree with your opinion as you disagree with mine.

There only one line eh?


Actually, don't tell me to chill and I won't tell you to smarten up.

I find your opinion incorrect, misguided, arrogant and insulting. Sorry, but it's wrong.

The one line? Yep. It was a cheap shot to somehow misrepresent my position. I took offense to bush league tactics. I notice you're not offering up an explanation or retraction.


Oh stop being so pompous.

You are not going to change my views on this. Any further 'debate' is quite futile.

By the way, it was a cheap shot at your sometime verbose posts. I apologise.




How exactly am i being pretentious when your casting judgments on vocations? I simply find it difficult to dismiss people's level of citizenry based solely on their job description.

And this "debate" as such isn't one as it assumes that your opinion counts for anything more than subjective beliefs. Are you honestly under the misguided notion that you can quantify "patriotism"? Again, it's an blatant advocacy of arbitrary superiority based solely on the idea that ONE social role outweights ALL others. Sorry, not buying it.

In regards to my alleged "verbose" posts, i'd say the last few were decidedly succinct, but apology accepted.


Actually they were quite concise for you! And I'm glad you acepted my apology. I really think we have all got past the cheap shot stage after many verbal battles.

Anyway chaps, I had fun but this horse is well flogged. I respect your opinions and I don't share them.

A good night to all, I'm up at 0330 hrs, gotta sleep!

   



Bodah @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:53 pm

[popcorn]

   



CapeApe @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:58 pm

Streaker Streaker:
Why the hell are so many people in the military so unwilling to stand up for Canadian sovereignty?

SHAME!!


did I miss something...where are you getting your information

   



Tricks @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:51 pm

lily lily:
Lovely quote. Add a pretty picture and you could have a nice poster for your wall.

However, you too are missing Streaker's point.
Actually, I think you are missing mine. The quote specifically says those who refuse to stand up for those around them are lesser then those who do. Who says doctors and teacher's don't? It was aimed at those who vehemently oppose any action to defend ourselves.

   



Tricks @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:13 pm

lily lily:
It was in response to what Streaker said, which had nothing to do with what you said.


Unless you believe those who don't wear the uniform "refuse to stand up for those around them"?
It was a response to streaker? Really? Did I quote him? Actually, Layton, and most of the NDP refuse to. Don't make assumptions, you make yourself look like a fool.

   



Pimpbrewski @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:18 pm

Soldiers, on the front line, may not be better than anyone else as human beings. Not saying that any profession is better than the rest either. But, surely, military personnel do deserve recognition.

That means whether you support the war or not.

   



Tricks @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:21 pm

lily lily:
When you choose to post a quote making no additional comment, you have to expect that people will "assume" you're responding to the previous post.
You said yourself there is no reason to address streaker with it. Maybe that should have been a clue.


$1:
You might also try to be a bit clearer, so people don't have to make assumptions when reading your posts. For example... what do Layton and the NDP refuse to do? Quote Streaker?
You're telling me to be clearer? How many times in an argument to you say "you miss my point". I'm starting to wonder if you have a point, ever.

As for you question, there is no one on this planet that dense.

   



Tricks @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:27 pm

lily lily:
Reread what you write sometimes, Tricks. You're obviously not as clear as you think.
Seems most other people don't have an issue with it, why do you and you superior writing and reading skills have an issue? You always say you were this fantastic writer, yet people always seem to miss your point.

   



Pimpbrewski @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:28 pm

Bodah Bodah:
[popcorn]


You know what. I'll sit and relax.

Pass the popcorn.

Huh, let's see, beer would be good with that too. Image

   



novachick @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 7:03 pm

[popcorn] I'm in

   



Hyack @ Mon Aug 06, 2007 7:07 pm

Me tooImage

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 ... 11  Next