RCMP likely swayed federal election, report says
DerbyX @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:24 pm
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
More proof that the CPC stands for corrupt party of Canada.
So you are making that claim based on accusations and no actual legal findings?For somebody who just stood quietly by as the usual suspects cried about Liberal collusion you have no valid stance to complain.
blah blah blah.
I won't be called to the carpet by somebody unwilling to criticize the same behaviour in his own people.
When you start holding others to the same standard then you can complain. Until then enjoy the weather.
I could say the same thing.
RUEZ @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:28 pm
DerbyX DerbyX:
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
More proof that the CPC stands for corrupt party of Canada.
So you are making that claim based on accusations and no actual legal findings?For somebody who just stood quietly by as the usual suspects cried about Liberal collusion you have no valid stance to complain.
blah blah blah.
I won't be called to the carpet by somebody unwilling to criticize the same behaviour in his own people.
When you start holding others to the same standard then you can complain. Until then enjoy the weather.
I could say the same thing.
Thanos @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:31 pm
The Liberals spent the entirety of the Chretien/Martin years stacking the RCMP and Elections Canada with their trolls, so it's hardly surprising that someone in either organizations ranks tipped off the Liberals to make arrangements to have their staffers on hand with videocams ready. Read Warren Kinsella again. There's no such thing as going too low if it means you win in the end. And there's no point in making parts of the state apparatus (i.e. Elections Canada, RCMP, CBC, etc) part of your political or ideological constellation if you aren't going to use them to go for the low blow when you have to.
Says it all, once again, ad infinitum, about what the Canadian version of Mexico's PRI will do to get back into power.
Johnny_Utah @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:42 pm
Liberals having Meltdowns: Priceless! 
DerbyX @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:05 pm
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
RUEZ RUEZ:
DerbyX DerbyX:
More proof that the CPC stands for corrupt party of Canada.
So you are making that claim based on accusations and no actual legal findings?For somebody who just stood quietly by as the usual suspects cried about Liberal collusion you have no valid stance to complain.
blah blah blah.
I won't be called to the carpet by somebody unwilling to criticize the same behaviour in his own people.
When you start holding others to the same standard then you can complain. Until then enjoy the weather.
I could say the same thing.
I have. I have corrected him numerous times on his innaccuracies concerning who sent troops into combat and with regards to the flag.
ridenrain @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:41 pm
DerbyX DerbyX:
To answer your question, this is far more evidence then was used to "convict" any Liberal of anything by the same crybabies whining that their party is being held accountable.
There's that BS line again.
Is that why the Liberal party of Canada was CONVICTED of stealing taxpayers money?
I don't recall the CPC, PC, Reform, or even the NDP ever CONVICTED of stealing taxpayers money.
Streaker @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:44 pm
Looks like the CONservatives might be on their way to being convicted of stealing an election, though.
romanP @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:32 pm
RUEZ RUEZ:
romanP romanP:
Here comes the real "adscam" and, strangely, ridenrain is completely silent.
The real adscam? Really? You think that a party possibly overspending their own money is worse than a sitting government missappropriating taxpayer money?I think political parties cheating to win after campaigning on accountability should have no place in Canadian politics, period.