Rumsfeld may face abuse charges
RUEZ @ Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:03 pm
Streaker Streaker:
uhh..... jeez, I really doubt that he meant for it to be taken literally!
There's a LOT of tongue-in-cheek in his posts, I think. On an internet forum that can lead to misunderstandings, but in such cases the mods should give the member in question the benefit of the doubt, or at least give the member a chance to clarify/explain his point, something which as far as I can see didn't occur here.
And the fact that there are soldiers on this site is immaterial. This isn't some dedicated military site where the civvies have to play by their rules.
Well he posted a crybaby rant in another thread so could have made his position clear, or apologize. He didn't. Anyone who makes jokes to the affect that Canadian soldiers should die should have his ass handed to him. At the very least a short time out is appropriate. I have family that may serve in Afghanistan in the future. I don't find it funny at all that someone would joke about them dying over there.
Scape Scape:
Streaker Streaker:
uhh..... jeez, I really doubt that he meant for it to be taken literally!

I don't.
Exactly. And if I'm not mistaken fig was once in the military as well, and has on previous occasions expressed regret at the death of Canadians in uniform.
$1:
Sure, let's pay the Yanks to let us fight their war for oil while they bomb us and shoot us while we sleep. Maybe with any luck the freakin' bombs'll just blow up on the gad dagged launcher, killing a bunch of Canucks and saving wear and taer on the flippin' Wart Hogs.
I don't think it was that bad. Maybe not the most factual but I don't think he deserves to be in gaol for it. I think I have read far worse things on this forum than what figs said. I believe in freedom of speech and I don't think people should be silenced no matter how much I disagree with them.
RUEZ @ Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:16 pm
Streaker Streaker:
Scape Scape:
Streaker Streaker:
uhh..... jeez, I really doubt that he meant for it to be taken literally!

I don't.
Exactly. And if I'm not mistaken fig was once in the military as well, and has on previous occasions expressed regret at the death of Canadians in uniform.
OH ok well I gues that gives him carte blanche to say anything he wants from here on out. Right? I'm so sorry I was offended. Maybe I'll leave so figfucker can feel welcome again.
RUEZ @ Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:18 pm
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
Sure, let's pay the Yanks to let us fight their war for oil while they bomb us and shoot us while we sleep. Maybe with any luck the freakin' bombs'll just blow up on the gad dagged launcher, killing a bunch of Canucks and saving wear and taer on the flippin' Wart Hogs.
I don't think it was that bad. Maybe not the most factual but I don't think he deserves to be in gaol for it. I think I have read far worse things on this forum than what figs said. I believe in freedom of speech and I don't think people should be silenced no matter how much I disagree with them.
Get used to it. People have been throw in jail here for things not half as bad as that.
RUEZ RUEZ:
Streaker Streaker:
uhh..... jeez, I really doubt that he meant for it to be taken literally!
There's a LOT of tongue-in-cheek in his posts, I think. On an internet forum that can lead to misunderstandings, but in such cases the mods should give the member in question the benefit of the doubt, or at least give the member a chance to clarify/explain his point, something which as far as I can see didn't occur here.
And the fact that there are soldiers on this site is immaterial. This isn't some dedicated military site where the civvies have to play by their rules.
Well he posted a crybaby rant in another thread so could have made his position clear, or apologize. He didn't. Anyone who makes jokes to the affect that Canadian soldiers should die should have his ass handed to him.
I'll agree that his post was in bad taste. But it's better to have this hashed out in the forum than just shut things down by jailing him. There are any number of members here who would have been able to give him a dressing down if they'd had a chance to.
RUEZ RUEZ:
At the very least a short time out is appropriate. I have family that may serve in Afghanistan in the future. I don't find it funny at all that someone would joke about them dying over there.
Fair enough, I didn't think it was very funny either. But I can't see a forum being run fairly if the mods resort to subjective criteria when deciding to jail/ban someone.
Instead of jail, can we at least call it Gitmo, just for some well deserved payback?
RUEZ @ Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:34 pm
Streaker Streaker:
Fair enough, I didn't think it was very funny either. But I can't see a forum being run fairly if the mods resort to subjective criteria when deciding to jail/ban someone.
Then why have the jail at all? Why ban anyone, It's all subjective. What I find distastefull obviously you and other's don't. Avro has been jailed for things his pals didn't think was that bad. Hell I've been jailed for doing nothing more than continuing to post in a thread after I was told not to. Too bad so sad. Life sucks some times.
RUEZ RUEZ:
Streaker Streaker:
Scape Scape:
Streaker Streaker:
uhh..... jeez, I really doubt that he meant for it to be taken literally!

I don't.
Exactly. And if I'm not mistaken fig was once in the military as well, and has on previous occasions expressed regret at the death of Canadians in uniform.
OH ok well I gues that gives him carte blanche to say anything he wants from here on out. Right? I'm so sorry I was offended. Maybe I'll leave so figfucker can feel welcome again.
All I can say is personally, I get offended all the time on this site, but I've only once asked a mod to ban or jail someone, and that was regarding a blatant neo-Nazi who had come around a long time ago.
MCB recently started a thread in which he revels in an instance of police brutality. I find it offensive, but I won't go to the mods about it.
ziggy @ Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:37 pm
ridenrain ridenrain:
Instead of jail, can we at least call it Gitmo, just for some well deserved payback?
That's what? His third tour now?
Think his slip into the dark side started way back when he was advocateing urinating on the war memorial last year. Been downhill ever since.
RUEZ RUEZ:
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
Sure, let's pay the Yanks to let us fight their war for oil while they bomb us and shoot us while we sleep. Maybe with any luck the freakin' bombs'll just blow up on the gad dagged launcher, killing a bunch of Canucks and saving wear and taer on the flippin' Wart Hogs.
I don't think it was that bad. Maybe not the most factual but I don't think he deserves to be in gaol for it. I think I have read far worse things on this forum than what figs said. I believe in freedom of speech and I don't think people should be silenced no matter how much I disagree with them.
Get used to it. People have been throw in jail here for things not half as bad as that.
And people have gotten off free with more then twice as bad as that...
RUEZ @ Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:42 pm
Streaker Streaker:
MCB recently started a thread in which he revels in an instance of police brutality. I find it offensive, but I won't go to the mods about it.
Good for you. You're a great person. I however will go to the mods each and every time someone like fig makes a comment suggesting Canadian soldiers should die.
Scape @ Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:45 pm
Please lock this thread.
Tricks @ Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:47 pm
RUEZ RUEZ:
Streaker Streaker:
MCB recently started a thread in which he revels in an instance of police brutality. I find it offensive, but I won't go to the mods about it.
Good for you. You're a great person. I however will go to the mods each and every time someone like fig makes a comment suggesting Canadian soldiers should die.
Or American soldiers, or British Soldiers, or any allied soldiers who fight for the greater good of this world. Fig is a sicko who fully deserves all his jail time.
Scape Scape:
Please lock this thread.
Why?
And - I might have gotten it wrong - what's your take on fig's comment?