Scientists say get ready for a hotter planet
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Not arguing against it but attempting to understand.
Sorry that all us fools are somewhat below your perceived intellect.
Oh... you forgot to add the air pressure at which Celsius scale was derived.
Shouldn't that attempt to understand something come before the incessant mockery?
I've never once claimed to be an authority on the subject of climate change, and I in fact know pretty dick all about it. That being said, I make even the most casual attempt to investigate these issues and it shows that you've not once bothered to take the time yourselves - even when it comes down to the most basic of concepts like understanding
what data is being presented.
It's a joke to me to be so lacking of personal integrity, and the constant snubbing of scientific research earns you no sympathy, so forgive me if I don't give you the respect you feel you deserve on this issue.
Trying to understand was the intent of my post.
The fact that you decided to mock us "fools" was uncalled for.
So please forgive me if I don't give you the respect you think you deserve.
ALL MUST BOW TO THE NEW RELIGION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, OR BE CAST AND DIE IN THE BOTTOMLESS RECYCLING PIT!
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
I was especially swayed by your argument that 1°C is twice as warm as 0.5°C
Depending on how you bias your chart,
it is.
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Trying to understand was the intent of my post.
The fact that you decided to mock us "fools" was uncalled for.
So please forgive me if I don't give you the respect you think you deserve.
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
I was especially swayed by your argument that 1°C is twice as warm as 0.5°C
Depending on how you bias your chart,
it is.

As I pointed out to samsquanch, 274.15°C is twice as warm as 0.5°C. Perhaps your blatant misinterpretation of the data could convince you otherwise, but that's your fault, not that of the researcher.
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
I was especially swayed by your argument that 1°C is twice as warm as 0.5°C
Depending on how you bias your chart,
it is.

As I pointed out to samsquanch, 274.15°C is twice as warm as 0.5°C. Perhaps your blatant misinterpretation of the data could convince you otherwise, but that's your fault, not that of the researcher.
You're still missing the point, aren't you?
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
I was especially swayed by your argument that 1°C is twice as warm as 0.5°C
Depending on how you bias your chart,
it is.

As I pointed out to samsquanch, 274.15°C is twice as warm as 0.5°C. Perhaps your blatant misinterpretation of the data could convince you otherwise, but that's your fault, not that of the researcher.
You're still missing the point, aren't you?
1°C is not twice as warm as 0.5°C.
Back in the 60's we called them unwitting dupes.
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Trying to understand was the intent of my post.
The fact that you decided to mock us "fools" was uncalled for.
So please forgive me if I don't give you the respect you think you deserve.

My point proved.
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
My point proved.
Focus less on your poor little feelings being hurt, and more on the fact that you need to actually learn a thing or two before spouting off on matters you don't understand.
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
My point proved.
Focus less on your poor little feelings being hurt, and more on the fact that you need to actually learn a thing or two before spouting off on matters you don't understand.
I could say the same for you. But then again I junked my pedestal a long time ago.
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
My point proved.
Focus less on your poor little feelings being hurt, and more on the fact that you need to actually learn a thing or two before spouting off on matters you don't understand.
I could say the same for you. But then again I junked my pedestal a long time ago.
Yeah, because of everyone involved with this thread, I'm the one who doesn't know what I've been talking about.
Still smartin' and want to try to put something back on me - it's okay, I understand.
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
My point proved.
Focus less on your poor little feelings being hurt, and more on the fact that you need to actually learn a thing or two before spouting off on matters you don't understand.
I could say the same for you. But then again I junked my pedestal a long time ago.
Yeah, because of everyone involved with this thread, I'm the one who doesn't know what I've been talking about.
Still smartin' and want to try to put something back on me - it's okay, I understand.
Still having trouble with the pedestal I see.
So we're back to global warming agan? I guess we had to switch to climate change because it was winter in North America. Is it going to be a dry, barren global warming/climate change or a oceans rising, flood kind of global warming/climate change?
Maybe these united scientists should check with the moonbats behind this sham and get you're story straight before you have to come up with another foolish change.
romanP @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:08 pm
Ooh, those pesky scientists. We should all consult our bibles, clearly those people knew more.
Global warming is not a myth, but for those who would like to believe that, I will say this: you will choke on your own smog, and I will laugh at you as I choke along with you.