Scientists say get ready for a hotter planet
Newsbot @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:21 am
<strong>Title: </strong> <a href="/link.php?id=26973" target="_blank">Scientists say get ready for a hotter planet</a> (click to view)
<strong>Category:</strong> <a href="/news/topic/9-science" target="_blank">Science</a>
<strong>Posted By: </strong> <a href="/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=Hyack" target="_blank">Hyack</a>
<strong>Date: </strong> 2007-11-09 10:04:37
<strong>Canadian</strong>
mixedfarmer @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:21 am
not good news for us on planet earth
Istanbul @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:38 pm
Rubbish.
Prepare for a Ice Age is closer to the truth.
No money to be made by fraudsters in that scenario just yet. Wait a decade or so before we switch tacks.
ShepherdsDog @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:18 pm
Well, it's certainly toasty here right now....31 C, but the air is crystal clear and there is a nice breeze.
mixedfarmer @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:30 pm
Istanbul Istanbul:
Rubbish.
Prepare for a Ice Age is closer to the truth.
No money to be made by fraudsters in that scenario just yet. Wait a decade or so before we switch tacks.
Prepare for a Ice Age is closer to the truth.
No money to be made by fraudsters in that scenario just yet. Wait a decade or so before we switch tacks.
Do you think it is a conspiracy ?
sasquatch2 @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:45 am
$1:
Do you think it is a conspiracy ?
In a manner of speaking...more like GROUP THINK
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM. The MSM has largely succeeded in keeping the truth about the discredited IPCC in silence. The MSM trumpeted/spun the BALI conference as a success while in reality it was the KYOTO process funeral.
Policy makers do not rely on the NY Times, GISS, NAS, or the IPCC as informations sources.
BartSimpson @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:54 am
Concurrently, other scientists are warning of a more dangerous cooling trend.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCommentary.a ... 0218a.html
Blue_Nose @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:12 am
sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?
sasquatch2 @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:56 am
Blue_Nose
$1:
sasquatch2 wrote:
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?
$1:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?
Spin Spin.
My point was why would a graph with "anomolies" be presented as an indication of temperature trend with a misleading component---that is "anomolies" rather than temperatures? Answer.....to demonstrate a non-exitant trend to the unwary.
ManifestDestiny @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:00 am
I predict the sky will fall with in a decade or so.
Blue_Nose @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:00 am
sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
Blue_Nose
Spin Spin.
My point was why would a graph with "anomolies" be presented as an indication of temperature trend with a misleading component---that is "anomolies" rather than temperatures? Answer.....to demonstrate a non-exitant trend to the unwary.
Tsk, tsk - still never bothered to actually determine what the term "anomaly" actually means, did you? That might explain why you abandoned the other thread when I showed up, but continue to spout your ignorance here.
$1:
sasquatch2 wrote:
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?
$1:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?
Spin Spin.
My point was why would a graph with "anomolies" be presented as an indication of temperature trend with a misleading component---that is "anomolies" rather than temperatures? Answer.....to demonstrate a non-exitant trend to the unwary.
ManifestDestiny @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:02 am
I will be like Nostrodamus abnd predict there will be a major catastrophie in a major city some where in the world in the next decade. 
PluggyRug @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:07 am
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?One thing which concerns me about that graph is, how it's (the graph) creators determined the "mean" value.
One would have to go so far back in time, in-fact, to a time when average temperature measurements could not have possibly been taken.
BartSimpson @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:09 am
ManifestDestiny ManifestDestiny:
I will be like Nostrodamus abnd predict there will be a major catastrophie in a major city some where in the world in the next decade.
OMG!!!!
We should give all our money to the UN because of this!!!!
BartSimpson @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:12 am
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?One thing which concerns me about that graph is, how it's (the graph) creators determined the "mean" value.
One would have to go so far back in time, in-fact, to a time when average temperature measurements could not have possibly been taken.
Indeed.
If I do a graph starting with 1998 then I can show that the world is cooling and that 2007 was well below 'average'.
