Previous  1 ... 3  4  5  6  7  8  9 ... 11  Next

Wrong. The eagerness to convert the ignorant to 'scientific fact' is often overwhelming in these threads.

Blinded by faith you are, I guess.

   

There's a God.

I know because there's a few courses of recruits out there that said I put the fear of him into them, and they wouldn't dare lie to me...

   

Don't you just hate those evangelical types

   

You mean, blinded by 'fact', right?

Because we bring up actual facts, we're trying to convert people?

Jeff and I don't have a faith. We have an opinion and an understanding based on facts not mythical beings, stories or beliefs.

   

What facts have you presented to support your assertion?

   

   

Convert people to "scientific fact"?

Science isn't a form of religion. That and thee are plenty of crazy people who don't believe in a god or science. Even the simple trust in science and study isn't something all Atheists share.

Trust me there are plenty of crazy Atheists out there that have no qualms about ignoring facts to assert other things.

So I'll say it again. The only thing that all Atheists share is a lack of belief in a god. That's it. There's nothing to convert people to or any kind of conspiracy.

   

About the same number of facts you've displayed.

I don't need to get into facts, as I'm sure you're aware of all the things that science has proven that contradicts with your beliefs.

In the end, whatever you want to take as the truth is your own business.

   

Uh no. Let's see some facts to support your assertion that there is no 'God'.

Remember, you're the one who has put that out, so back it up with facts.

   

Of course you're trying to convert. You wouldn't be here preaching scientific fact over faith as the preferred way of life if you were not.

   

The burden of proof is on the people who believe in talking snakes, people living to be hundreds of years old, life without a physical body, resurections, all that crazy stuff that nobody has ever witnessed happening.

Its the same as if someone came to you and said we need to help this Jack guy, he got stuck in a very large bean plant and giants are chasing him. If they said prove he's not, would you go about doing it? Or laugh hysterically at the nutter?

   

Wrong. The burden of proof here is on those who have presented the argument that there is no God.

So prove it. Present your arguments. Present your facts.

I'm simply amazed that whenever you are cornered here with the idea that you need to bring facts to support your assertion, you tuck tail and run like a stung whippet.

   

Are you trying to tell me there's no beanstalk? WTF, buddy. Poor Jack is up there fighting for his life!

Bring us a talking snake, or I call BS on the whole story.

   

Do you really want to have a debate on science and then tell me that science is false and your belief is true?

I'll take a snippet from the original article:



That being the case, the entire creationist theory you Christians have has been proven to be incorrect time and time again and yet, you'll twist yourself into knots trying to wiggle around it.

   

Science can be shown to be true and/or to explain things that are known to exist. "God(s)", not so much.

   

Previous  1 ... 3  4  5  6  7  8  9 ... 11  Next