Caledonia blockade taken down, then put back up
Stoutlimb @ Tue May 23, 2006 6:40 pm
Well that's what the locals are using as a word too. I guess you are calling them childeren too. I guess sabotage of public infrastructure to cause as much harm as possible to the general public isn't terrorism. But it's getting close.
By the way, that was quite funny. I'd mod you up if this was that kind of website.
Stoutlimb @ Tue May 23, 2006 6:41 pm
The entire town is living on native land?? I don't believe so. The dispute is just over one new subdivision where nobody even lives yet.
RPW @ Tue May 23, 2006 7:37 pm
Let's say you have a pizza (and a pretty yummy one at that!). Then I take it away from you and give you back one slice (the one with the least amount of pepperoni)
So you are saying that it's no longer your pizza just because I took most of it away from you.....?
---
RickW
Stoutlimb @ Tue May 23, 2006 11:00 pm
So the blockade is there because the townspeople stole pizza from the natives? What do the townspeople have to do with this?
You make no sense. I thought the fight was with the federal government.
h.f. wolff @ Wed May 24, 2006 1:53 pm
With REAL property, ie. land, buildings, the title thereto is as per the LAST dated entry into the land titles registry in the municipality or region within which the property lies.
This is the reason why the check and title/keys are exchanged at the titles registry so that nobody can get anything entered into the registry against the property between these two actions:(exchange of title and payment).
To contest ownership registered in the title's registry requires court action, or fraud.
The provincial government's hands-off policy proves what I have espoused for decades: Any organization with enough membership can do, in Canada, what it will. The various levels of government will do nothing to establish law and order; it simply provides window-dressing for media distribution to the masses.
In this instance they appoint a has-been premier with no clue, who merely talks about issues instead of resolving them: #1: clear the ******public roadways!!! #2: Jail saboteurs: burning of electrical distribution transformer, destroying of public roadway.
To illustrate the foregoing assertion simply replace instances of "group action" with "individual's action". In the latter case that individual would be arrested so fast it would make his head spin.
Canadian governments NEVER defend the Canadian Citizen's, or tax payer's, rights.
If you know instances contrary to my opinion I would be more than pleased to stand corrected.
H.F. Wolff