Venezuelan Government To Launch International 9/11 Investiga

Written By: 4Canada
Date: 2006-03-31 09:21:00
<a href="/article/2111585-venezuelan-government-to-launch-international-911-investigation">Article Link</a>

Jimmy Walter has been at the forefront of a world tour to raise awareness about 9/11 and has still yet to receive any response to his million dollar challenge in which he offers a $1 million reward for proof that the trade towers' steel structure was broken apart without explosives.

Rodriguez said that he was told an FBI agent had asked the hotel him and Walter were staying in turn over a list of names of residents. Upon hearing this, the National Assembly provided armed military protection for the entirety of the trip. In addition, Walters said that CIA agents were seen surveilling the beach on which he and Rodriguez had handed out free DVD's a day earlier.

<a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/310306launchinvestigation.htm">http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/310306launchinvestigation.htm</a>

I hope they have the means to deal with the huge amount of real scientific proofs that goes against the official story. I also hope that other nations will join in. On that, I am sure Iran will join in, then Russia, then China, and maybe just maybe, Canada. The biggest hurdle will be for the US government to release some very important documents, data (radar!!!) and recordings.

Canada will not join, not with Harper the Bilderberg neo-Con puppet at the helm. That bastard.

If there is a very strong voice from the Canadians, he will have to join or else there will be forced elections. Let's get organised!

dedicated to armyguy

Long Live
The 911 Conspiracy!
Anyone still care about the heap of disturbing,
unsolved questions surrounding Our Great Tragedy?

By Mark Morford
SF Gate Columnist
3-31-6

Here is your must-read for the month.

Here is your oh-my-God-I'm-sending-this-piece-to-every-smart-person-I-know hunk of outstanding, distressing, disquieting media bliss.

Here it is: an absolutely exceptional inside scoop on the white-hot world of Sept. 11 conspiracy theories, writ large and smart by Mark Jacobson over at New York magazine, and it's mandatory reading for anyone and everyone who's ever entertained the nagging thought that something -- or rather, far more than one something -- is deeply wrong with the official line on what actually happened on Sept. 11.

See, it is very likely that you already know that Sept. 11 will go down in the conspiracy history books as a far more sinister affair than, say, the murky swirl of the Kennedy assassination. You probably already know that much of what exactly happened on Sept. 11 remains deeply unsettling and largely unsolved -- or to put another way, if you don't know all of this and if you fully and blithely accept the official Sept. 11 story, well, you haven't been paying close enough attention.

But on this, the third anniversary of the launch of Bush's illegal invasion of Iraq by way of whoring the tragedy of Sept. 11 for his cronies' appalling gain, what you might not know, what gets so easily forgotten in the mists of time and via the endless repetition of the orthodox Sept. 11 tale, is the sheer volume, the staggering array of unanswered questions about just about every single aspect of Sept. 11 -- the planes, the WTC towers, the Pentagon, the fires, the passengers and the cell phone calls and the firefighters and, well, just about everything. It is, when you look closely, all merely a matter of how far down the rabbit hole you are willing to go.

Verily, Jacobson, in his New York mag piece, encounters crackpots and fringe nutballs and those who think Sept. 11 was connected to aliens and electromagnetic fields and the Illuminati. It can, unfortunately, get a little crazy. But there is also a very smart, grounded, intelligent and surprisingly large faction -- which includes eyewitnesses, Sept. 11 widows, former generals, pilots, professors, engineers, WTC maintenance workers and many, many more -- who point to a rather shocking pile of evidence that says there is simply no way 19 fanatics with box cutters sent by some bearded lunatic in a cave could have pulled off the most perfectly orchestrated air attack of the century. Not without serious help, anyway.

Whose help? This, of course, is the biggest question of all, one which many of the more well-researched theories go a surprisingly long way toward answering.

You have to sift and sort. There are disturbing questions about collapse speeds and controlled demolitions and why the towers fell when the all-steel infrastructure was designed to easily withstand the temperatures of any sort of fire, even burning jet fuel.

There are questions of the mysterious, media-documented blasts deep in the WTC towers that took place after the planes hit. There are questions of why there was such a short-selling spree on shares of American Airlines and United Air Lines the day before the attack, huge doubts about the failures of NORAD and the FAA, the bizarre case of the missing plane in the Pentagon crash, and also the downing of Flight 93 where, according to the coroner, no blood or major plane wreckage was actually found. There is, ultimately, the stunning failure of the entire multi-trillion-dollar American air-defense system. Just for starters.

There is also the very big question of what happened to 7 WTC, the only building not hit by anything at all, but which collapsed anyway, in a perfect controlled-demolition sort of way, for no reason anyone can sufficiently explain. But which just so happened to contain vital offices for the IRS, the Department of Defense, the CIA, the Secret Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission and more.

But perhaps Jacobson's article is insufficient for you. Perhaps you have heard much of it before, or you're more of the visceral type and need to actually see the proofs in order to delve deeper, have them laid out like gruesome body parts in a mesmerizing autopsy. Fair enough.

For you, we have the surprisingly compelling indie documentary "9/11 Loose Change" (Google it), freely available on the Internet and produced by three very astute and very young and very strong-willed dudes who managed to cobble together a truly astounding array of proofs and interviews and evidence, a full 1 hour and 20 minutes' worth of mesmerizing footage you will not be able to easily forget.

Or maybe you should peruse one of the countless Sept. 11 conspiracy sites, many of which link to relevant video and one of which -- scholarsfor911truth.org -- claims to be "a non-partisan association of faculty, students, and scholars, in fields as diverse as history, science, military affairs, psychology, and philosophy, dedicated to exposing falsehoods and to revealing truths behind 9/11." Start there.

Now, it's very true that some of the more specious conspiracy claims have been largely discredited and proved false. Some of the more radical "evidence" gathered by theorists is quite suspect and easily placed in the category of no-way-in-hell. This is valid. This is as it should be. You have to chew through a lot of skin and gristle to get to the real meat.

But oh the meat. The overwhelming quantity, the bloody, deadly stench of it. Fact is, it is quite impossible to watch the entire "Loose Change" documentary and not come away just a little shaken, a little awed by the sheer number of perversely interrelated facts and aberrant coincidences-that-aren't-coincidences, shaking your head at how it all seems to irrefutably prove there is far, far more to the Sept. 11 tragedy than just crazy Osama and his band of zealots, as you begin to sink into a sighing morass of rage and frustration and suspicion and mistrust. You almost can't help it.

Of course, there is another option. There is another way out. You may, as is the standard cultural default, simply ignore it all, scoff and roll your eyes and shrug it all off because it's just too bleak and distasteful to entertain the idea that the dark Sept. 11 thread winds all the way through the NSA and the FBI and the White House and the Project for the New American Century and Dick Cheney's mangled soul and God only knows where else.

But then again, no. You have to look. You have to try. Knowledge is power, and while the truth may be spurious and slippery and messy and deep, the pursuit of it is just about the only thing we have left. Give that up, and all that's left is spiritual numbness, emotional stasis and death. So what are you waiting for?

_____

Mark Morford's Notes & Errata column appears every Wednesday and Friday on SF Gate and in the Datebook section of the SF Chronicle. To get on the e-mail list for this column, please click here and remove one article of clothing. Mark's column also has an RSS feed and an archive of past columns, which includes a tiny photo of Mark probably insufficient for you to recognize him in the street and give him gifts. As if that weren't enough, Mark also contributes to the hot, spankin' SF Gate Culture Blog.

---
Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing, the rest is mere sheep-herding.
Ezra Pound

Would this investigation not be seen as a perfect reason for the US to attack Venezuela? I'm only asking.

Would this investigation not be seen as a perfect reason for the US to attack Venezuela? I'm only asking.

insightful Q
the world has witnessed the Bush administation's manufacture of reason and should not be surprised to see that trend to continue

---
Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing, the rest is mere sheep-herding.
Ezra Pound

As with all Empires throughout history that tried to hard and had their hands full, the American Empire will soon crumble and will need to pull back in their country.

And that is based on...
We had a liberal government for 4 years after 9/11 and they launched no investigation, but if Harper refuses to then it's obviously a neo-conservative thing? Realistically, how much noise has any politician made about this? Don't pin it on Harper.
Seriously, you can find reasons to hate anyone if you try hard enough.

Signs of increasing desperation by the upholders of the "official, corporate media's stamp of approval" conspiracy theory start to appear. The 'Fear Of Muslims' Conspiracy Theory Betsy Hart's catch-all explanation for 9/11 questions Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | March 31 2006 Betsy Hart has formulated a catchy and convenient conspiracy theory for why so many people are asking serious questions about what happened on 9/11. We're all scared! Unfortunately, this lethargic leap of logic fails to address the requisition laid forth by Charlie Sheen last week - challenge us on the facts. Hart was a guest on last week's Hannity and Colmes spot which highlighted Sheen's comments to The Alex Jones Show in which he outlined his serious doubts about the official story of 9/11. "The threat of Islamic terrorism is so frightening, so unpredictable, so unknowable that in some ways it's easier and more manageable for some folks to think that our government is behind it all," writes Hart in a piece for Scripps Howard News Service. Well, that explains it all for me! How convenient, now I can restore my unbridled trust in the all-loving government, watch American Idol and go back to sleep! <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/310306fearofmuslims.htm">The Fear of Muslims Conspiracy Theory</a> ROFLMAO.

I really don't think that the Canadian Government past or present were involved in the despotic plans of 9-11. Like any other things, it takes a certain critical mass and a wakeup call for an issue to break through. Now that the critical mass of people are over that disbeleif of 9-11 events (official story) their brains are starting to see what really went (or did not) wrong with this official story.

LIKE YER STYLE, SPANKY

---
Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing, the rest is mere sheep-herding.
Ezra Pound

"Seriously, you can find reasons to hate anyone if you try hard enough."

or to support them too LOL

---
Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing, the rest is mere sheep-herding.
Ezra Pound

Maybe it will help. I'm not holding my breath though. 
 
The most credible investigations have yet to receive the proper attention. The "From the Wilderness" website has an article today that seems relavent to keep in mind when trying to get to the bottom of 911: 
 
 
March 30, 2006 1300 PST (FTW) - ASHLAND - Michel Chossudovsky, Paul Thompson, Nafeez Ahmed, Mike Ruppert, Dan Hopsicker; these are the people who were front and center with credible, original, and groundbreaking research and investigation in the months following the attacks of September 11th. For the next three years, almost every major, incontrovertible piece of evidence showing government complicity in the attacks originated from this group. Add to this list David Ray Griffin, the late-comer author of two excellent books deconstructing the US government’s “explanation” of the attacks, and you have encompassed five of the best-selling books about 9/11—books which thoroughly and reliably discredit the US government. It is also from these scholars, investigative journalists, and researchers that almost every now-standard, unanswered issue debunking the government’s position originated. 
 
There are other writers and researchers who made serious contributions to our knowledge of 9/11, but these five were there “firstest with the mostest.” 
 
It is also no coincidence that these are the journalists and authors who have been universally ignored by the mainstream media. Why? Because their research doesn’t fall over with the first puff of opposing wind. That’s a lesson that the latest flock of 9/11 celebrities needs to be prepared for. 
 
<a href="http://www.copvcia.com/free/ww3/033006_charlie_sheen.shtml">http://www.copvcia.com/free/ww3/033006_charlie_sheen.shtml</a> 
 
It's worth the read if one has the time. 
 
Mike

Hmmmmm...why ask for residence lists unless you're planning a hit?

Good thing the Venezualans trust the US gov't and it's agencies even less than we do.

And regarding the following:

"The threat of Islamic terrorism is so frightening, so unpredictable, so unknowable that in some ways it's easier and more manageable for some folks to think that our government is behind it all," writes Hart in a piece for Scripps Howard News Service.

Nice conjob at painting an invincible bogeyman.

"so frightening" : to who exactly?

"so unpredictable" : uh..yeah..ever hear of Able Danger?

"so unknowable" : only if you buy the official US BS.

I'd sure love to see Bush and his cadre flee the US in the middle of the night if the truth ever really makes it out to the US public.

It's a dream I have.

---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

"The Weapon" - Rush