Conservative Support Firms, Lead By 8 and 6 ,12
true enough zig..
me, i would like to see a return to those times..
Apollo @ Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:34 am
ziggy ziggy:
I was born in 1961 and back then only one parent had to work,but PET raised tax's to the point where 2 had to work to make ends meet,the libs ran with that and now we have both parents having to work,daycare subsidized so both parents can work,just to pay the freaking tax's that the lib's imposed in the first place.
And now we have the leader of the lib party asking for more of our tax dollars.....unreal.
Isn't that the left's true hidden agenda.
Make it so that we become dependant on the government. Tax us to have to get second jobs to keep us in our place. Tax us even more so that we thank them when they give us a couple of daycare spots. Tax us even more so that we may be thankful that they give us a few hot meals a week. Then we will wake up one day and realize that Canada has become communist and we will look back to these times and claim Layton was a right wing neo-con.
How much damage did Harper do with the mention of taxing the Income Trusts? A hell of alot damage.
Just because he says he will give them four years ..big deal,cause the BA'a come out,and say the business models are no longer valid.Now the trust cuts way back on the dividend so no chance to recover as Harper lies to all about recovery of the income trust funds.
Pissed off as about 15% of my RRSP went out the window..%#$^&*^&(
Hey in B.C nobody cares to much about the fact Provincal Conservatives have a"Innovative Clean Energy Fund Levy"
So big deal about a carbon tax.The way climate change is going, a tax of some sort will be announced by the Industriaized countries
lily lily:
Reverend Blair Reverend Blair:
Ruez, I'm not the one who deleted the posts and have done my best to convey the spirit of those posts (Jump!) since their deletion.
I'm pretty sure that's against the rules.
Don't about Rev too much Lil, I think it's obvious to anyone who has to endure reading his misguided, uninformed, uneducated , bias and condescending BS posts that he's nothing more than a forum troll who's favourite hobby is probably looking at himself in the mirror or making love to a Layton blow up doll.
Rather than being able to reply in a civil manner to anyone that challenges something that he posts he usually replies with condescending insults. It's probably because he doesn't have the capacity to back up his own BS so instead he tries to throw out insults to make himself look better, how many times has have we heard Rev comment on someone's literacy?
It's to bad the "Rev. for Annoying Medal" thread was locked. Not that it would stop him anyways but at least it would serve as a warning to others.
ziggy @ Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:02 am
I'm still laughing!
$1:
he's nothing more than a forum troll who's favourite hobby is probably looking at himself in the mirror or making love to a Layton blow up doll.
ziggy @ Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:57 am
lily lily:
ziggy ziggy:
I was born in 1961 and back then only one parent had to work,but PET raised tax's to the point where 2 had to work to make ends meet,the libs ran with that and now we have both parents having to work,daycare subsidized so both parents can work,just to pay the freaking tax's that the lib's imposed in the first place.
And now we have the leader of the lib party asking for more of our tax dollars.....unreal.
martin14 martin14:
true enough zig..
me, i would like to see a return to those times..
Most women wouldn't.
Only one family member having to work?
I think they would.
lily lily:
ziggy ziggy:
I was born in 1961 and back then only one parent had to work,but PET raised tax's to the point where 2 had to work to make ends meet,the libs ran with that and now we have both parents having to work,daycare subsidized so both parents can work,just to pay the freaking tax's that the lib's imposed in the first place.
And now we have the leader of the lib party asking for more of our tax dollars.....unreal.
martin14 martin14:
true enough zig..
me, i would like to see a return to those times..
Most women wouldn't.
i'd be willing to bet a lot of kids would.