Democracy in Canada?
Arctic_Menace @ Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:04 pm
benny_patrick7 benny_patrick7:
And how do you call the situation where members of Parliament stand up one by one and like puppets say "yes" or "no" depending on which party they belong? If a party has a majority, it can pass any law it pleases. If not this is not a dictatorship, what is?
I can agree with you that this dictatorship might be temporary, but it is still a dictatorship.
By the way, dictatorship of Nazis or Communists was also temporary.
I can agree with you that this dictatorship might be temporary, but it is still a dictatorship.
By the way, dictatorship of Nazis or Communists was also temporary.
And I thought ryan29 didn't know shit about Canadian politics...
Mustang1 @ Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:19 pm
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
benny_patrick7 benny_patrick7:
And how do you call the situation where members of Parliament stand up one by one and like puppets say "yes" or "no" depending on which party they belong? If a party has a majority, it can pass any law it pleases. If not this is not a dictatorship, what is?
I can agree with you that this dictatorship might be temporary, but it is still a dictatorship.
By the way, dictatorship of Nazis or Communists was also temporary.
I can agree with you that this dictatorship might be temporary, but it is still a dictatorship.
By the way, dictatorship of Nazis or Communists was also temporary.
And I thought ryan29 didn't know shit about Canadian politics...
I was out at,
$1:
"You might not like to hear, but both French and English have some very serious defects in their DNA, since they consider children as sex objects."
and
$1:
This is what he told me: as far as Eastern European women are concerned, they met Soviet army as liberators and there was need to rape anyone, they were very happy to oblige
There's no point granting this an audience.
Regina @ Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:24 pm
Thanos @ Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:29 pm
As far as bohunk comedy acts go this one was pretty lame.
SprCForr @ Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:00 pm
Hey the multiple murder is back!
smorgdonkey @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 4:54 am
It should be like the New Zealand system in that you MUST vote or you get fined. That would ensure that more people paid more attention and candidates would actually have to watch their conduct.
benny_patrick7 @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:47 am
I guess I nailed you pretty bad that the only thing you could respond is that it is ahistorical. To you, it may be history, but to me - I was there and seen that. Got the difference?
$1:
And I thought ryan29 didn't know shit about Canadian politics...
Elaborate on this.
Public_Domain @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:58 am
uwish @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 8:00 am
yes it would be and we are close, I would like to see EEE senate or get rid of it
free votes in the house, proportional representation by population
then we will have a true Democracy and the CPC is the only party with this on the burner.
SprCForr @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:27 am
benny_patrick7 benny_patrick7:
I guess I nailed you pretty bad that the only thing you could respond is that it is ahistorical. To you, it may be history, but to me - I was there and seen that. Got the difference?
Elaborate on this.
$1:
And I thought ryan29 didn't know shit about Canadian politics...
Elaborate on this.
I suspect he doesn't want to engage in a discussion with the likes of Fabrikant.
EyeBrock @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:34 am
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Democracy would be a nice thing to have in Canada.
Awww, poor didums's party got thrashed at the polls......
'No democracy 'cos we lost! Boo hoo!"
Pseudonym @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 10:35 am
I think a I lost a few brain cells just skimming this thread. I am afraid to actually try to find them again now.
Mustang1 @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:01 pm
benny_patrick7 benny_patrick7:
I guess I nailed you pretty bad that the only thing you could respond is that it is ahistorical. To you, it may be history, but to me - I was there and seen that. Got the difference?
Elaborate on this.
$1:
And I thought ryan29 didn't know shit about Canadian politics...
Elaborate on this.
Still ahistorical nonsense. Sorry, you're not worth it. Next.
Mustang1 @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:02 pm
SprCForr SprCForr:
benny_patrick7 benny_patrick7:
I guess I nailed you pretty bad that the only thing you could respond is that it is ahistorical. To you, it may be history, but to me - I was there and seen that. Got the difference?
Elaborate on this.
$1:
And I thought ryan29 didn't know shit about Canadian politics...
Elaborate on this.
I suspect he doesn't want to engage in a discussion with the likes of Fabrikant.
HyperionTheEvil @ Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:52 pm
benny_patrick7 benny_patrick7:
And how do you call the situation where members of Parliament stand up one by one and like puppets say "yes" or "no" depending on which party they belong? If a party has a majority, it can pass any law it pleases. If not this is not a dictatorship, what is?
I can agree with you that this dictatorship might be temporary, but it is still a dictatorship.
By the way, dictatorship of Nazis or Communists was also temporary.
I can agree with you that this dictatorship might be temporary, but it is still a dictatorship.
By the way, dictatorship of Nazis or Communists was also temporary.
15 posts and you're already thumping a Godwin in here.
Shoo