Nanos: CP 34, LP 31, NDP 18
ridenrain @ Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:49 pm
Reverend Blair Reverend Blair:
$1:
* Stephen Harper 95 (+9) not 89 which by the way would be +3, not -6
The numbers come directly from the Nanos site, Scarecrowe. The ones I posted were today's numbers.
I don't know what date Riden's numbers are from.
From the link at the top of the page.
Where's youres from?
Reverend Blair @ Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:12 pm
Those are today's Nanos numbers, Riden.
http://www.nikonthenumbers.com/topics/show/106
Yours are from a couple of days ago.
I wasn't aware that this interweb thingy was so difficult for people to comprehend. Or maybe it's the whole idea of calendars you have trouble with.
Reverend Blair @ Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:14 pm
Oh, by the way, there'll be new numbers tomorrow, and the day after that, and the day after that, and so on.
ridenrain @ Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:19 pm
Why would you not assume that I got the numbers right from the link at the top of the page? Either you didn't read them or you didn't like them enough to accept them.
It's interesting that they changed the question for the leaders. Not getting the results they were paid for?
hurley_108 @ Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:22 pm
ridenrain ridenrain:
Why would you not assume that I got the numbers right from the link at the top of the page? Either you didn't read them or you didn't like them enough to accept them.
It's interesting that they changed the question for the leaders. Not getting the results they were paid for?
It's interesting that they changed the question for the leaders. Not getting the results they were paid for?
What do you mean "changed the question"?
Reverend Blair @ Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:24 pm
Nanos polls for CPAC, Riden. If you are going to claim that there's a bias there, I have no choice but to assume you are on yet another meth binge.
I assumed you were smart enough to realize that a daily rolling poll would have new numbers every day. I apologize for overestimating your meager intelligence.