The Man that the Conservatives don't want you to know about
Ruserious Ruserious:
hwacker hwacker:
You are 15, in your lifetime the liberals have been in power, you have no idea what the other party's would be like in power.
Well I sure as hell am not 15 and I do remember what it was like when there was another party in power.
And apparently so have the majority of Canadians for the past 12 years because the stench of the Conservatives screwing this country up with their fiscal mismanagement still lingers in the noses of the majority of Canadians when they go to the polls.
Hence, if it looks and still smells like shit, they're still shit.
Which is why Canadians keep saying "OH HELL NO" to the Conservatives and voting for the better party, the Liberals.
So humour me. Show the data that backs your contention that Mulroney's Conservatives screwed-up the country with their fiscal mismanagement. Don't bother looking at StatsCan or anywhere else that collects such data without bias. The numbers there show that Mulroney inherited a helluva screwed-up mess from P.E. Trudeau. And it also shows that bit-by-bit those Conservatives and their "mismanaging" turned all the negative economic indicators around. It also shows that all the positive growth continued upwards at the same rate or better from 1987 - 95, and that most growth plateaued and then began to fall in 1996 - 97. Chretien inherited low single-digit inflation, single-digit interest rates, low unemployment (relative to 1984), decreased government spending and increasing GDP. All thanks to Conservative "mismanagement". All Chretien had to do was call the plays from the Conservative playbook (which he did for the first two years of his first term) and he would've looked like a champ. But like a true Liberal, he couldn't help messing with something that worked, and fucking-it-up in the process.
You may have been around in the '80's, hell you may even have been conscious. Who am I to say? But from your accusations, it sure don't seem like you were paying attention.
So we find ourselves in the same boat as we were in 1980. One province is prosperous and keeping the good ship Canada afloat, and the Liberals are trying to figure-out how to pull the plug. We might be lucky this time and get a Conservative government before the Liberals find the plug, but if not we'll have to hope the Conservatives, who get elected after the Liberals pull the plug, have enough time to fix the leak, bail us out and right the course.
Hey kids,... remember in 1989 when Mr. Chretien pointed at Mr. Mulroney and said "This is the man who has given Canadians an 80 cent dollar"? Funny, how the dollar was at 85 cents when he said it, not at 80 cents, like when Mr. Mulroney took over from Mr. Trudeau. Funny, how quiet Mr. Chretien was when the dollar sank to 67 cents in 1997. Strange, how Canadian productivity fell behind our American competitors in 1997, and never caught-up,... even when a booming Alberta economy brought our dollar back up to 84 cents. Guess you'd need a Liberal to explain how they've saved our economy from Conservative mismanagement.
DerbyX @ Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:22 am
Gunplummer,
We have been down this road before. I repeat.
$1:
A brief look at Canada'a finances:
1990: debt = 350 (Bil) Mulroney Gov't records 6th straight 30 (Bil) deficit
BTW don't blame anyone but them.
BOC rate @ 10.3%
1991 Ottawa imposes 7% GST, unemployment @ 10.3%
Our high interest rates (Mulroney screwed up, they should have dropped them) causes dollar to = .893 US. Exports & tourism waydown, record levels of Canadians shopping in US further hurting local economy.
1992 Debt = 450 (Bil) Standard & Poor downgrade Canada triple-A credit
rating.
Oct 1993: Libs sweep into power and attack the deficit. Libs report that the PC's have not disclosed all federal debts and have masked higher deficits then reported.
1994 fed debt @ 500 Billion. By the start of 1995 the Wall Street Journal has suggested we are bankrupt. In Feb 1995 Paul Martin (finance minister) promises to slash 25 (BIL) from spending. At this point our debt to GDP ratio is 68.4%
1996: Things look up, Bank rate down to 3.25%, loonie around .7 US feuling a massive increase in exports. Economic upswing increase fed revenues by 12%
1997: Liberals bring in first fed surplus in 28 years You are welcome
Sept 11, 2001: Financial market shaky. BOC trims interest rates by 1.5% Stays low up til present.
Jan 2002 interest rate = 2%, lowest since 1960. economy doing well all across Canada for the most part.
May 2002: Canada's triple-A credit rating restored. estimated savings per year with lower rate ~300 million.
Feb 2005: Goodale's budget estimates debt to GDP ratio at 39% or roughly half what the PC gov't gave us.
Sure the PC gov't inherited a debt & deficit from the previous gov't but they made the situation far worse and passed on far worse to the Libs. The Libs changed that. If the situation were reversed you would be screaming long & loud about how the Libs bankrupted Canada and the Cons saved us.
DerbyX DerbyX:
Gunplummer,
We have been down this road before. I repeat.
$1:
A brief look at Canada'a finances:
1990: debt = 350 (Bil) Mulroney Gov't records 6th straight 30 (Bil) deficit
BTW don't blame anyone but them.
BOC rate @ 10.3%
1991 Ottawa imposes 7% GST, unemployment @ 10.3%
Our high interest rates (Mulroney screwed up, they should have dropped them) causes dollar to = .893 US. Exports & tourism waydown, record levels of Canadians shopping in US further hurting local economy.
1992 Debt = 450 (Bil) Standard & Poor downgrade Canada triple-A credit
rating.
Oct 1993: Libs sweep into power and attack the deficit. Libs report that the PC's have not disclosed all federal debts and have masked higher deficits then reported.
1994 fed debt @ 500 Billion. By the start of 1995 the Wall Street Journal has suggested we are bankrupt. In Feb 1995 Paul Martin (finance minister) promises to slash 25 (BIL) from spending. At this point our debt to GDP ratio is 68.4%
1996: Things look up, Bank rate down to 3.25%, loonie around .7 US feuling a massive increase in exports. Economic upswing increase fed revenues by 12%
1997: Liberals bring in first fed surplus in 28 years You are welcome
Sept 11, 2001: Financial market shaky. BOC trims interest rates by 1.5% Stays low up til present.
Jan 2002 interest rate = 2%, lowest since 1960. economy doing well all across Canada for the most part.
May 2002: Canada's triple-A credit rating restored. estimated savings per year with lower rate ~300 million.
Feb 2005: Goodale's budget estimates debt to GDP ratio at 39% or roughly half what the PC gov't gave us.
Sure the PC gov't inherited a debt & deficit from the previous gov't but they made the situation far worse and passed on far worse to the Libs. The Libs changed that. If the situation were reversed you would be screaming long & loud about how the Libs bankrupted Canada and the Cons saved us.
Yes, I remember that "discussion" (in which you posted the same list). I remember that it had been a
fairly civil debate, until you decided to turn it into an insult-fest. At that time, I decided you weren't interested in reasonable debate, much less a reply that contradicted your impassioned argument. Since then, I've learnt to give as good as I get when rhetoric turns to flames. Judging by the tone of your post above, I'm inclined to believe you might be willing to discuss this in a more reasonable manner.
If you want my civil reply, which will debunk the majority of your list with hard facts and data, you'll have to wait a few days. I do most of my posting at work these days, as my off-hours leave little time for much besides commuting, a quick shower and a few hours sleep. Unfortunately, all the good info is stored on my home server and I'll present it here in a coherent fashion when I have the free time (say Wednesday or Thursday next week [keeping my fingers crossed I won't be working on my days off,... again])
Hope you won't find my reply too limited, as most of it will rely on data gleaned from StatsCan, Elections Canada and similar sources. These are the most comprehensive and objective data sources which are easily accessed. And of course, I'll provide links to all references, so any doubters can verify the accuracy of the information as I present it.
DerbyX @ Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:38 am
$1:
Yes, I remember that "discussion" (in which you posted the same list). I remember that it had been a fairly civil debate, until you decided to turn it into an insult-fest. At that time, I decided you weren't interested in reasonable debate, much less a reply that contradicted your impassioned argument. Since then, I've learnt to give as good as I get when rhetoric turns to flames. Judging by the tone of your post above, I'm inclined to believe you might be willing to discuss this in a more reasonable manner.
Hardly. You were as much an instigator as anything. Time and time again the cons on this forum want no part of an honest debate just a place to scream insults at the Liberals although there have been a few instances.
$1:
If you want my civil reply, which will debunk the majority of your list with hard facts and data, you'll have to wait a few days.
Since my info came from statscan & Macleans you will have little success "debunking" hard data. You may interpret it differently. Few cons give credit where credit is due and just want to avoid giving credit to the Libs at the same time as absolving the cons of any and all blame. Dishonest in the least. The fact is that under the Mulroney Canada was nearly declared bankrupt and not all of it can be attributed to the recession. The PC's made an (understandable) attempt to combat rising unemployment but did so with "busy" work type jobs such as cutting grass, raking leaves, etc. That was money that should have been spent (if at all) in infrastructure repair, military equipment upgrades, purchasing hospital equipment, or other things that had lasting value beyond giving someone a job. We could not afford it at the time. That was a mistake on their part. That was fiscal mismangement.
$1:
If you want my civil reply, which will debunk the majority of your list with hard facts and data, you'll have to wait a few days. I do most of my posting at work these days, as my off-hours leave little time for much besides commuting, a quick shower and a few hours sleep. Unfortunately, all the good info is stored on my home server and I'll present it here in a coherent fashion when I have the free time (say Wednesday or Thursday next week [keeping my fingers crossed I won't be working on my days off,... again])
Fine.
$1:
Easterners Steamed at Harper
Alliance Leader in Hot Water
The Toronto Sun, by Maria McClintock, Ottawa Bureau, May 31, 2002
Canadian Alliance Leader Stephen Harper could get boiled like a lobster if he goes ahead with his summer swing through Atlantic Canada.
Harper was in such hot water yesterday he was "too tired" to face the national media.
"He's tired. He's been doing Atlantic media all day ... setting the record straight," said Harper's communications director, Doug Main.
Maritimers are in an uproar over Harper blaming the Alliance's poor showing in the region on a "defeatist" attitude among Atlantic Canadians.
"There's unfortunately a view of too many people in Atlantic Canada that it's only through government favours that there's going to be economic progress, or that's what you look to," Harper had said Wednesday. "The kind of can't-do attitude is a problem in this country but it's obviously more serious in regions that have had have-not status for a long time."
The bitterness reached such a fevered pitch yesterday that the Nova Scotia legislature unanimously passed a motion condemning Harper.
"You can't expect to be a national leader who's successful if you become a serial offender of the sensitivities of the regions," said Tory Leader Joe Clark.
He's his own worse enemy when it comes to the East. 4 Atlantic Provinces, 4 PC governments, I'll go a step further with this...NF has a Con gov. for the past 2 yrs...NS and NB has Con gov for 6 yrs....PEI has Con gov for 9 yrs.......Now if any of these men were at the helm of the good ship CPC,(Bernard Lord would be a good choice from what(little) I read of him) then Atlantic Canada would be Blue across the board. Instead we get to hear some guy from Alberta come down East(but only when there is an election comming up) and try and win our vote by insulting us.....Now I will never claim that I'm the smartest guy in the world(although I might if I thought it would help ease the parting of a pretty girls legs

) but this does't seem like a good way of winning votes to me. But hey, what do I know...I'm just a dumbass lazy Eastener waiting for my next welfare cheque from the Gov.....It's not like I'd be willing to pack up my shit, move 3000+ miles away from the place I love just to find a bit of decent employment or anything....
$1:
By and large, Newfoundlanders, perhaps in greater measure than any other citizens of this country, will stay in Newfoundland joyfully if there's an opportunity.
I'd move back tomorrow if I had a decent job that paid 1/2 of what I get here and had no worries of being laid-off.