Canada Kicks Ass
BC Parents Will Have to Lie to Keep Kids out of Gay Advocacy

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5 ... 28  Next



hwacker @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:18 pm

Right on que sirejoe

Post the sites with other side, i'd love to pick that one appart.

There is no other side, no need for this at all. Public school, you won't hear about my religion, we don't want to hear about some perverted lifestyle. Simple as that.

   



Hardy @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:18 pm

BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Hardy Hardy:
I'd like to see the schools teach a few things in addition to traditional subjects. First and foremost, lots of critical thinking skills. But that's off-topic.

I don't think there's anything wrong with teaching toleration of those who are different, I think that's an extremely positive thing. I feel that it's counterproductive, though, to single out any group for such treatment. Any time you do something for a particular sort of person, you're neglecting the others, and there are way too many sorts of people in the world to cover them all.

So just encourage kids to put aside bigotry against those who are different in whatever way. If you want people to be treated equally and fairly, a logical starting point is to treat them equally and fairly yourself -- no singling anyone out.


Do you see the contradiction here? On onehand you want children to decide for themselves how they see the world and how they inerpret world events but then you want the schools to indoctrinate them with a worldview that predetermines an outcome to how those children view the world.

You cannot indoctrinate children and then ask them to exercise critical thinking skills because what happens when a child comes to the rational conclusion that (insert name of group) are not a group whose values/practices should be emulated or praised.

You're the one who needs to engage some of that critical thinking you're advocating. :wink:


While one can take anything to an irrational extreme, toleration of others is, for the most part, rational. It's a requirement of human society. I have plenty of disagreements with members of my own family, let alone others. But, unless it becomes clear that there is good reason to do otherwise, I still show people a modicum of respect. Crappy people may defy stereotypes. Great people usually do, and show up in the most unexpected places.

You have some belief in tolerance, too, or we wouldn't be having this dialogue. Sure, it still requires critical thinking skills. What doesn't?

   



Tricks @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:29 pm

Completely and utterly retarded. Teach shit we actually need to know, and let us figure out how we want to think on our own. What is this looking through the curriculum to make sure it is gay friendly? Are you fucking kidding me? Oh noes, someone may be offended. Suck it up princess...or would prince be more of an insult?

   



themasta @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:30 pm

Zipperfish Zipperfish:
hwacker hwacker:
Here's the problem, if you say one word about this you're labeled a homophobe before you blink once. Then if you smear the fags for calling you a homophobe you get charged with a hate crime. You think they are getting it up the butt, all of Canada is. Thanks Liberals you really know how to screw a country.

There is no reason to have this in school. If you’re born with this problem (like they say) no schooling is needed.


No, I think your labelled a homophobe becasue you are a homophobe. Perhaps you hadn't considered that.


And you are a racist because you are white. Dissenting opinion does not automatically preclude someone to being a homophobe or a racist. To use such terms stymies debate and bullies those into believing what you believe. So go ahead, keep using those terms you Nazi.

   



Clogeroo @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:34 pm

They are playing games though. Wasn't it not too long ago that it was settled the state had no business what they do in their homes? Now they are trying to make the state promote what they do in their homes and make it everyone's business. If you are into multiple sexual partners are we going to have to learn about that too or everyone’s sexual pleasures?

Homosexuals are not a race or a civilisation they are people who suffer either from chemical imbalances within their brains or are homosexuals for psychological reasons. It is a medical and psychological condition if people wanted to learn about it can take a class of some sorts dealing with just that. But I don't think children need to learn about it in any school system forcibly. Learning about sexual education in school is optional if you do not wish to partake in it you do not have too. In kindergarten I remember we figure painted we didn't learn about sexual nature for you would probably be too young to even grasp the concept.

When were the people asked about this? When were the parents and teachers consulted in this decision-making? The government works for the people not the other way around the people should decide what they want their children to learn and be taught in school.

   



Zipperfish @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:37 pm

How do you know if I'm white? We're all racist to some degree I suppose. But I don't refer to asians as chinks and to black people as niggers; nor do I refer to gay people as fags.

   



JonasCanuck @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:39 pm

This situation has developed because very few parents teach their children anything about sex or anything else. In North America fewer than 20% of parents even bother to read to their kids. So abdicating parental responsibilities means someone else, like the school, has to do it. And then you've lost control and it gets harder to call the shots. In any case, I don't think teaching tolerance for gltb is quite the same thing as promoting homosexuality. And even if it were, promoting homosexuality can't make anyone gay unless they're gay already. Furthermore, I think there's far too much fuss made about sex education, and glbt tolerance when we should be focussing on a much more serious issue... as we saw yesterday... guns and violence. BTW, this purported newspaper has an agenda of its own... its news partner is Catholic World News. And as far as I'm concerned, Catholicism has very little credibility. One of its (the newspaper's) principles is "... the social worth of traditional Judeo-Christian principles but is also respectful of all authentic religions and cultures that esteem life, family and universal norms of morality." My universal norms of morality are true tolerance for all and not trite codewords for hate and exclusivity. (As you can guess, I'm a liberal.)

   



Zipperfish @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:39 pm

Clogeroo Clogeroo:
Homosexuals are not a race or a civilisation they are people who suffer either from chemical imbalances within their brains or are homosexuals for psychological reasons. It is a medical and psychological condition if people wanted to learn about it can take a class of some sorts dealing with just that.


How do you know its a medical condition? Couldn't it be a genetic predisposition?

   



hwacker @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:40 pm

Zipperfish Zipperfish:
hwacker hwacker:
Here's the problem, if you say one word about this you're labeled a homophobe before you blink once. Then if you smear the fags for calling you a homophobe you get charged with a hate crime. You think they are getting it up the butt, all of Canada is. Thanks Liberals you really know how to screw a country.

There is no reason to have this in school. If you’re born with this problem (like they say) no schooling is needed.


No, I think your labelled a homophobe becasue you are a homophobe. Perhaps you hadn't considered that.


No I think you're wrong. I just don't like gays. :lol:

   



themasta @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:41 pm

Zipperfish Zipperfish:
How do you know if I'm white? We're all racist to some degree I suppose. But I don't refer to asians as chinks and to black people as niggers; nor do I refer to gay people as fags.


I was making a logical arguement and even dressed it up in witty commentary but apparently you are just too diminuitive in your mental faculties to grasp such concepts. So here, I'll break it down for you.
You
Are
Dumb.

And trying to debate with you is pointless.

   



Ripcat @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:46 pm

hwacker hwacker:
Ah Canada where we have the 3R's

Reading
Writing
Rear entry

Rear entry = Catholic contraception! :lol:

Anyways, I don't see any point in pointing out the sexual preferences of historical figures in History class....

   



Zipperfish @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:47 pm

themasta themasta:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
How do you know if I'm white? We're all racist to some degree I suppose. But I don't refer to asians as chinks and to black people as niggers; nor do I refer to gay people as fags.


I was making a logical arguement and even dressed it up in witty commentary but apparently you are just too diminuitive in your mental faculties to grasp such concepts. So here, I'll break it down for you.
You
Are
Dumb.

And trying to debate with you is pointless.


Making a logical argument? An argument is a series of statements intended to demonstrate a proposition. Not only wasn't your statement logical, it wasn't an argument.

Well, you certainly didn't try too hard to make your point. However, if it makes you feel better to relegate me to Stoopidville, so be it. No skin off my teeth.

Oh, and minus five for the Nazi comparison.

   



Zipperfish @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:50 pm

hwacker hwacker:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
hwacker hwacker:
Here's the problem, if you say one word about this you're labeled a homophobe before you blink once. Then if you smear the fags for calling you a homophobe you get charged with a hate crime. You think they are getting it up the butt, all of Canada is. Thanks Liberals you really know how to screw a country.

There is no reason to have this in school. If you’re born with this problem (like they say) no schooling is needed.


No, I think your labelled a homophobe becasue you are a homophobe. Perhaps you hadn't considered that.


No I think you're wrong. I just don't like gays. :lol:


I've never liked th ewrod homophobe myself. I think the word bigot suits you quite nicely.

   



hwacker @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:54 pm

Zipperfish Zipperfish:
hwacker hwacker:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
hwacker hwacker:
Here's the problem, if you say one word about this you're labeled a homophobe before you blink once. Then if you smear the fags for calling you a homophobe you get charged with a hate crime. You think they are getting it up the butt, all of Canada is. Thanks Liberals you really know how to screw a country.

There is no reason to have this in school. If you’re born with this problem (like they say) no schooling is needed.


No, I think your labelled a homophobe becasue you are a homophobe. Perhaps you hadn't considered that.


No I think you're wrong. I just don't like gays. :lol:


I've never liked th ewrod homophobe myself. I think the word bigot suits you quite nicely.


Sure thing you hetrophobe.

Anymore Liberal slurs you'd like to throw ?

   



Zipperfish @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:05 pm

hwacker hwacker:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
hwacker hwacker:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
hwacker hwacker:
Here's the problem, if you say one word about this you're labeled a homophobe before you blink once. Then if you smear the fags for calling you a homophobe you get charged with a hate crime. You think they are getting it up the butt, all of Canada is. Thanks Liberals you really know how to screw a country.

There is no reason to have this in school. If you’re born with this problem (like they say) no schooling is needed.


No, I think your labelled a homophobe becasue you are a homophobe. Perhaps you hadn't considered that.


No I think you're wrong. I just don't like gays. :lol:


I've never liked th ewrod homophobe myself. I think the word bigot suits you quite nicely.


Sure thing you hetrophobe.

Anymore Liberal slurs you'd like to throw ?


Yeah. Live and let live. It's called freedom.

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5 ... 28  Next