Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

To bring it back to the point, these all should be shut down.
What started out to correct simple wrongs has become a crusade and profitable business for A-holes like Warman.
In pursuit of crimes, the HRC are hacking innocent citizens accounts and posting hate, trolling for anything they can inflate into a trial and a quick paycheck.

we agree completely.

Ya great idea Donny_Brasco... just ignore the problem until it goes away. What and ignorant thing to say.

Great post, hwacker. I'm glad you took the time to pass this along. I've always known the CHRC and the OHRC has a particular political agenda but I didn't realize they were so blatantly biased.

I am all for freedom of speech. In fact I support this radicals right to speak his mind. That is what makes our society better than his and why we will always prevail. But I do have a big problem with the double standards of these so called human rights commissions which have obviously been taken over by the radical left. After all, left-wing philosophies cannot sustain themselves without maniputation and spin and these commissions are just one of the weapons in their arsenal.

It is the culture of lawyers and social studies departments, not political bias that has turned the country into one that ignores freedom and looks to institutions.

Like in the U.S. where the people traded rule of law and freedom for security after 9/11.

Canada trades rights and freedoms to create an elevated political class who are subsidized by the state, to attack political screeds and infantile rantings of inbreds.

LoL at me being called a leftie.

InternetChatter...

I'm assuming you're talking about the Patriot Act. There are a lot of mis-conceptions about that law... most of which is spin and dis-information from the left. The Patriot Act isn't nearly as powerful as you might think. Do a little more research into it and you will see.

one specific example would be ignoring both US law in regard to military tribunals, and that these tribunals even disregarded the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The Supreme Court ruled 5-3 on this being wrong.

They were implemented after WWII to address specific inefficiencies of the Articles of War which were used in the Second World War.

There are plenty of ways to have swiftly dealt with the Guantanamo scum. Instead the dolt President decided to throw out 200+ years of the finest law in the world.

It is embarrassing to see such legal history disregarded by such a dimwit.

The problem with the prisoners in Guantanamo Bay is they don't fall under the Geneva Convention and they don't fall under U.S. law. There is a great article (I will try and find it) that goes into the details of why Bush had no choice but to act as he did with those prisoners. Convienitly it wasn't released until after the U.S. election. I'm sure they didn't want to make Bush look good in any way.

The question is what do you do with them. Most are Taliban and our swore enemies that are more than willing to fight Canadian soldier, so we can't allow then to do that. The can't be sent to the U.S. for trial because they will be let go for not having a speedy trial. And Al-quida (sp) and the Taliban also said if they get a hold of any of those prisoner they will be beheaded for co-operating with infidels, so, they can't release them because of that. What do you do?

Why don't they fall under the Geneva Convention, and why not under US law?

whose fault is it, that they didn't get a speedy trial???

I have no problem with a Military trial. Military trials are based on the rule of Military Code and justice.

Previous  1  2  3  4  Next