Canada Kicks Ass
Welfare Drug Test?

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5 ... 15  Next



tritium @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:59 pm

Robair Robair:
This was in my mail, one of those "forward it on if you agree" things.

$1:
This was written by a construction worker in Fort MacMurray...he sure
makes a lot of sense to me!
Read on...

I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my
taxes as it sees fit.
In order to earn that pay cheque, I work on a rig site for a Fort Mac
construction project, I am required to pass a random urine test, with
which I have no problem.
What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my
taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare cheque because I
have to pass one to earn it for them ... ?
Please understand - I have no problem with helping people get back on
their feet.

I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sit on their
arse drinking beer and smoking dope.
Could you imagine how much money the provinces would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance cheque ... ?

Please pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.
Hope you will pass it along though, because something has to change in
this country, and soon!


Thoughts? I have no idea what is involved in qualifying for this sort of thing. Never been on pogy or welfare.


R=UP [flag]

This should be sent to the Provincial Premier.

   



Benoit @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:43 pm

Zipperfish Zipperfish:
newfette newfette:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.


cause you'd fail the ensuing test? :lol:


Catastrophically!!!!

Seriously, becasue I don't want some guy watching me piss in a cup. And because if you don't believe me when I tell you that I would never even consider showing up to work in any state other than sober, drug-free and ready to go, then I don't want to work for you.


Because you are not alone, workfare (slavery) is unproductive.

   



Ex-Expat @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:31 pm

Zipperfish Zipperfish:
newfette newfette:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.


cause you'd fail the ensuing test? :lol:


Catastrophically!!!!

Seriously, becasue I don't want some guy watching me piss in a cup. And because if you don't believe me when I tell you that I would never even consider showing up to work in any state other than sober, drug-free and ready to go, then I don't want to work for you.


I've worked in IT and/or electrical for many years, and I have peed in a cup for some of the biggest names out there... and landed some great pay as a result, btw.

In the case of a job, it's not about trusting you, personally. Many times it is because companies don't want the additional risks and liabilities inherent with hiring someone who uses. And the thing is, you could say it's their business if they do it on their own time, but the fact of the matter is that many people start out this way and you never know if they'll become addicted and start coming to work stoned/drunk, thus making some mistake that injures or kills a co-worker. I don't blame them one bit, and I don't take it personally. There are some very deceitful and dangerous people out there, and they have no way of knowing I'm not one of them.

More on topic...

Back in the States, at one time in my life, I did need welfare. I used that assistance to bust my ass in college to get a degree and some marketable job skills so I could be self-sufficient. And I took so much crap from people, who before hearing my story, assumed I was a druggie do-nothing just leeching off the system. So I really resent anybody that wants to laze about getting high/drunk while on the public dole. I say if you want public help, the least you can do is pee in a cup. Had it been required of me, I would have done so without hesitation.

   



sasquatch2 @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:36 pm

Drug testing at hiring, and radom testing after is compulsory in many professions.

Some of the masterbaiters here seem to feel themselve superior to truck drivers, who cannot have a beer after work----because they would fail a possible random test next day.

Indeed to drive internationally drug testing is manditory.

This resistance to drug testing of welfare recipients begs the question----do they have something to hide? If a welfare recipient tests positive, this is likely why they are unemployed/unemployable.

Don't play the disability card because the disabled should get disability.

   



Zipperfish @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:15 pm

Ex-Expat Ex-Expat:

I've worked in IT and/or electrical for many years, and I have peed in a cup for some of the biggest names out there... and landed some great pay as a result, btw.


Yeah, I understand you. That's probably why I'm not rich--becasue I don't care what they paid me, if my word's not good enough, fuck 'em. Also, it may have seomthing to do with the fact that I'm congenitally lazy and have no marketable skills.

   



Benoit @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:49 pm

sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
Drug testing at hiring, and radom testing after is compulsory in many professions.

Some of the masterbaiters here seem to feel themselve superior to truck drivers, who cannot have a beer after work----because they would fail a possible random test next day.

Indeed to drive internationally drug testing is manditory.

This resistance to drug testing of welfare recipients begs the question----do they have something to hide? If a welfare recipient tests positive, this is likely why they are unemployed/unemployable.

Don't play the disability card because the disabled should get disability.


When you live in a society where people are so proud to piss in public, you better hide yourself from them.

   



Ex-Expat @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:49 pm

Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Ex-Expat Ex-Expat:

I've worked in IT and/or electrical for many years, and I have peed in a cup for some of the biggest names out there... and landed some great pay as a result, btw.


Yeah, I understand you. That's probably why I'm not rich--becasue I don't care what they paid me, if my word's not good enough, fuck 'em. Also, it may have seomthing to do with the fact that I'm congenitally lazy and have no marketable skills.


I certainly understand your viewpoint. It's embarrassing. And for people like you and me who take pride in our work ethic, it's hard not to take it as a vague sort of insult. But the sad fact is that more and more institutions of various sorts are finding it necessary to do. I don't know how it's done here yet, but in the States, worker's comp insurance companies are starting to require the employers to drug test employees in order to qualify for coverage. They've found the resulting reduction in workplace accidents to be well worth it.

:lol: Oh, Z! Surely you're not insinuatin' that I'm the insinuatin' type. :D

   



Wally_Sconce @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:50 pm

I have no problem with urine tests, it narrows the playing field and makes it easier for me to find work.

   



Benoit @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:56 pm

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:
I have no problem with urine tests, it narrows the playing field and makes it easier for me to find work.


Have you ever ask yourself why it has to be easy to find work?

http://www.whywork.org/

   



Ex-Expat @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:57 pm

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:
I have no problem with urine tests, it narrows the playing field and makes it easier for me to find work.


Hehe yep. And in the case of welfare, it also would narrow the playing field... making it easier for those people who really are trying to get back on their feet, to get the help they need.

   



Benoit @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:03 pm

Ex-Expat Ex-Expat:
Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:
I have no problem with urine tests, it narrows the playing field and makes it easier for me to find work.


Hehe yep. And in the case of welfare, it also would narrow the playing field... making it easier for those people who really are trying to get back on their feet, to get the help they need.


Passive resistance is a useful way to fight exploitation.

   



romanP @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:45 pm

Brenda Brenda:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.


So you wouldn't be on welfare if you had to, because otherwise, you could not feed your kids?


Welfare is not a job.

   



romanP @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:46 pm

DrCaleb DrCaleb:
newfette newfette:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.


cause you'd fail the ensuing test? :lol:


I like Poppyseed Strudel. That would give a false positive for heroin. So would poppyseeds on a bagel.

Which is why I oppose mandatory drug testing for anyone. Or if an prospective employer asks to check my credit references. Why should I have to defend the undefendable?


Also, it's none of their damn business what you do to yourself in your own private time.

Piss on the piss police.

   



Ripcat @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:49 pm

I understand that alot of companies in the oilsands are giving up the drug testing because they can't find enough new hires that can pass the test....

   



romanP @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:51 pm

Ex-Expat Ex-Expat:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
newfette newfette:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
I wouldn't take any job where the work descirption involves supervised peeing in a cup.


cause you'd fail the ensuing test? :lol:


Catastrophically!!!!

Seriously, becasue I don't want some guy watching me piss in a cup. And because if you don't believe me when I tell you that I would never even consider showing up to work in any state other than sober, drug-free and ready to go, then I don't want to work for you.


I've worked in IT and/or electrical for many years, and I have peed in a cup for some of the biggest names out there... and landed some great pay as a result, btw.

In the case of a job, it's not about trusting you, personally. Many times it is because companies don't want the additional risks and liabilities inherent with hiring someone who uses. And the thing is, you could say it's their business if they do it on their own time, but the fact of the matter is that many people start out this way and you never know if they'll become addicted and start coming to work stoned/drunk, thus making some mistake that injures or kills a co-worker. I don't blame them one bit, and I don't take it personally. There are some very deceitful and dangerous people out there, and they have no way of knowing I'm not one of them.


Well, here's the funny thing. A lot of people take stimulants on their job, and employers allow it, piss test free. Why? Because they're coffee and cigarettes! Many of these people are addicted to both, and will be unable to work if they don't have their coffee and cigarette!

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5 ... 15  Next