was 911 an inside job?
Jaime_Souviens @ Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:30 pm
I think the Japanese were astonished by the great success they had.
It is true that the effect on the American public was far greater than any strictly military success.
camerontech @ Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
$1:
Actual experts have determined that controlled demolitions were used.
Oooo. An actual expert.
Well, now I believe it completely. An actual expert has spoken. A nameless expert. An expert off the internet who's probably a Sophomore at the Missouri College of Mines, but an actual expert. An expert with no known credentials, an expert with no known background, training, or experience, but an actual expert nevertheless. He has spoken. So now we all have to sit down and shut up before such compelling evidence. He is an actual expert. This guy who posted has actually heard of him, though probably second or third hand. And that settles it. An actual expert has spoken. ---Thank god he just wasn't any old expert. This guy is an actual one, so he's gotta be right.
"An actual expert has spoken." My big fat pimply ass....
I'm taking a blasting course next semester at Cambrian College, once I pass that class I'll be an actual expert. I'll review the tapes after that and determine if they were blown up or not. Seeing how I'll be and actual expert by then and all, and anyone who knows anything about blasting could determine that those towers were blown up
ManifestDestiny @ Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:52 pm
I just took a ride in my UFO anyone want to take a spin?
PluggyRug @ Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:58 pm
ManifestDestiny ManifestDestiny:
I just took a ride in my UFO anyone want to take a spin?
Oh please yes...can we go to Xanadu and meet the Spin King.
borg @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:59 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
borg borg:
how did 19 arabs manage to get a 2 hr window to fly around and 'attack america,' without some serious help on the inside.
Wow. I wonder how 2,000 Japanese flew around Hawai'i for two hours and managed this without inside help...
It is called NORAD and the FAA, and standard operating procedure that was non-existent during WW2. Standard procedure is to scramble jets to get a visual on any plane that goes off course or has a transponder turned off or is nonresponsive.
remember the golfer stewart, his plane is met 18 minutes after it fails to communicate.
who was responsible for air defence on 911? rumsfeld, richard myers and general eberhart. Did they get fired for blowing standard procedure on 911? no, they got promoted........ Promoted after a massive air defence failure, where standard procedure had been followed 67 time previously that year.
As for climbing cows and aliens, people who actually think would ignore such childish commentary..
The evidence is undeniable, insiders had to be involved. And those who simply state they do not believe an inside job are ignoring the evidence or perhaps, do not want to believe the implications.
and what about the massive put options trading that the 911 ommision commision said don't need to investigate that. Bullshit, the reason it was not invetigated was because of where it leads. do some research it is not hard with google.
ps 1 piece of evidence refuted does not negate the massive case at hand.
Jaime_Souviens @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:14 pm
borg borg:
The evidence is undeniable, insiders had to be involved. And those who simply state they do not believe an inside job are ignoring the evidence or perhaps, do not want to believe the implications.
The absence of evidence is not evidence.
PluggyRug @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:18 pm
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
borg borg:
The evidence is undeniable, insiders had to be involved. And those who simply state they do not believe an inside job are ignoring the evidence or perhaps, do not want to believe the implications.
The absence of evidence is not evidence.
Correct, but then again....How many pigs in the pigpen?
Yank-in-NY @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:33 pm
Conspiracy theories are alot more entertaining than the real events.
Let's not forget how many conspiracy theories have been proven to be correct after all
I lived through the dam thing, you can ask as many questions as you like, you won't change the facts or present evidence to counter scientific analysis.
BartSimpson @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:35 pm
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
borg borg:
The evidence is undeniable, insiders had to be involved. And those who simply state they do not believe an inside job are ignoring the evidence or perhaps, do not want to believe the implications.
The absence of evidence is not evidence.
What? You have no evidence to support that hypothesis!
BartSimpson @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:38 pm
Yank-in-NY Yank-in-NY:
Let's not forget how many conspiracy theories have been proven to be correct after all
Sure thing, Mulder.
Yank-in-NY @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:45 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Yank-in-NY Yank-in-NY:
Let's not forget how many conspiracy theories have been proven to be correct after all
Sure thing, Mulder.
I was being sarcastic Bart or don't you comprehend the meaning of the rolling eyes?
BartSimpson @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:47 pm
Yank-in-NY Yank-in-NY:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Yank-in-NY Yank-in-NY:
Let's not forget how many conspiracy theories have been proven to be correct after all
Sure thing, Mulder.
I was being sarcastic Bart or don't you comprehend the meaning of the rolling eyes?
Likewise, just running with the whole conspiracy thing - I was expecting your retort to be along the lines of callig me Scully.
DerbyX @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:48 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Yank-in-NY Yank-in-NY:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Yank-in-NY Yank-in-NY:
Let's not forget how many conspiracy theories have been proven to be correct after all
Sure thing, Mulder.
I was being sarcastic Bart or don't you comprehend the meaning of the rolling eyes?
Likewise, just running with the whole conspiracy thing - I was expecting your retort to be along the lines of callig me Scully.
You're Scully.
BartSimpson @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:48 pm
BartSimpson @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:51 pm
DerbyX DerbyX:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Yank-in-NY Yank-in-NY:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Yank-in-NY Yank-in-NY:
Let's not forget how many conspiracy theories have been proven to be correct after all
Sure thing, Mulder.
I was being sarcastic Bart or don't you comprehend the meaning of the rolling eyes?
Likewise, just running with the whole conspiracy thing - I was expecting your retort to be along the lines of callig me Scully.
You're Scully.
I'll take that as a compliment - Scully was hot!
And which of these three are you?
