Web of cold-blooded lies
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 Next
JOHNNY1PROUDCANADIAN @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:58 pm
LOL @ Dark Canuck 
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:58 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
johnny2 johnny2:
BUSH IS NO BETTER THEN HITLER WAS....BOTH 2 EVIL MONSTERS
You're funny.
I wouldn't go so far as to say Hitler. Hitler was at least a decent politican.
The first guy was funnier.
Tman1 @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:00 pm
Yah Johnny2 always gives me some chuckles.
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:01 pm
johnny2 johnny2:
LOL @ Dark Canuck
Yes, he is a riot.
JOHNNY1PROUDCANADIAN @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:02 pm
Yeah , bush had already decided for the Iraq ppl
The Hoser @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:03 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Spreading democracy is just icing on the cake.
No, it's a lie the Bush and his pupetteer came up with after their other WMD lie was sunk, it's an effetive tool to keep their sinking liferaft afloat, but it's wearing thin.
Actually, it's not a lie since Iraq just held a democratic election.
Let me rephrase. After the other lies were sunk, Bush and co needed somthing else to keep their Iraq invasion plans afloat. So they decided to spread Democracy, which they may very well be doing. But the new Democratic leader of Iraq, what is he going to be? More than likely a puppet of the Bush administration, he probably doesn't hold any real power.
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:03 pm
johnny2 johnny2:
Yeah , bush had already decided for the Iraq ppl
Huh?
Tman1 @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:04 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Spreading democracy is just icing on the cake.
No, it's a lie the Bush and his pupetteer came up with after their other WMD lie was sunk, it's an effetive tool to keep their sinking liferaft afloat, but it's wearing thin.
Actually, it's not a lie since Iraq just held a democratic election.
Let me rephrase. After the other lies were sunk, Bush and co needed somthing else to keep their Iraq invasion plans afloat. So they decided to spread Democracy, which they may very well be doing. But the new Democratic leader of Iraq, what is he going to be? More than likely a puppet of the Bush administration, he probably doesn't hold any real power.
$1:
But the new Democratic leader of Iraq, what is he going to be? More than likely a puppet of the Bush administration, he probably doesn't hold any real power.
Oh im sure he does, I dont think the noble Iraqi people would lower themselves to be puppets. But it remains to be seen in terms of future goals.
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:09 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Spreading democracy is just icing on the cake.
No, it's a lie the Bush and his pupetteer came up with after their other WMD lie was sunk, it's an effetive tool to keep their sinking liferaft afloat, but it's wearing thin.
Actually, it's not a lie since Iraq just held a democratic election.
Let me rephrase. After the other lies were sunk, Bush and co needed somthing else to keep their Iraq invasion plans afloat. So they decided to spread Democracy, which they may very well be doing. But the new Democratic leader of Iraq, what is he going to be? More than likely a puppet of the Bush administration, he probably doesn't hold any real power.
Actually, installing a new government was part of the plans from the get-go. It wasn't like we were going to move in, plunder the WMD's, and then just leave. And we wouldn't install anything other than a democracy.
The Hoser @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:10 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Spreading democracy is just icing on the cake.
No, it's a lie the Bush and his pupetteer came up with after their other WMD lie was sunk, it's an effetive tool to keep their sinking liferaft afloat, but it's wearing thin.
Actually, it's not a lie since Iraq just held a democratic election.
Let me rephrase. After the other lies were sunk, Bush and co needed somthing else to keep their Iraq invasion plans afloat. So they decided to spread Democracy, which they may very well be doing. But the new Democratic leader of Iraq, what is he going to be? More than likely a puppet of the Bush administration, he probably doesn't hold any real power.
Actually, installing a new government was part of the plans from the get-go. It wasn't like we were going to move in, plunder the WMD's, and then just leave. And we wouldn't install anything other than a democracy.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you origonally said that spreading Democracy was an afterthought. You later edited it to say Icing on the cake, but it pretty much says the same thing...
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:13 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Spreading democracy is just icing on the cake.
No, it's a lie the Bush and his pupetteer came up with after their other WMD lie was sunk, it's an effetive tool to keep their sinking liferaft afloat, but it's wearing thin.
Actually, it's not a lie since Iraq just held a democratic election.
Let me rephrase. After the other lies were sunk, Bush and co needed somthing else to keep their Iraq invasion plans afloat. So they decided to spread Democracy, which they may very well be doing. But the new Democratic leader of Iraq, what is he going to be? More than likely a puppet of the Bush administration, he probably doesn't hold any real power.
Actually, installing a new government was part of the plans from the get-go. It wasn't like we were going to move in, plunder the WMD's, and then just leave. And we wouldn't install anything other than a democracy.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you origonally said that spreading Democracy was an afterthought. You later edited it to say Icing on the cake, but it pretty much says the same thing...
Yes, the goal of spreading democracy was an afterthought. The primary thought was to eliminate Saddam and his capabilities.
The Hoser @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:16 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Spreading democracy is just icing on the cake.
No, it's a lie the Bush and his pupetteer came up with after their other WMD lie was sunk, it's an effetive tool to keep their sinking liferaft afloat, but it's wearing thin.
Actually, it's not a lie since Iraq just held a democratic election.
Let me rephrase. After the other lies were sunk, Bush and co needed somthing else to keep their Iraq invasion plans afloat. So they decided to spread Democracy, which they may very well be doing. But the new Democratic leader of Iraq, what is he going to be? More than likely a puppet of the Bush administration, he probably doesn't hold any real power.
Actually, installing a new government was part of the plans from the get-go. It wasn't like we were going to move in, plunder the WMD's, and then just leave. And we wouldn't install anything other than a democracy.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you origonally said that spreading Democracy was an afterthought. You later edited it to say Icing on the cake, but it pretty much says the same thing...
Yes, the goal of spreading democracy was an afterthought. The primary thought was to eliminate Saddam and his capabilities.
Nevertheless, the Democratic leader of Iraq will most likely be a puppet. I still think that if the US has plans for freeing a country from a dictator, they should have started in North Korea or maybe an African country that is being fucked over terribly.
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:17 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
Nevertheless, the Democratic leader of Iraq will most likely be a puppet. I still think that if the US has plans for freeing a country from a dictator, they should have started in North Korea or maybe an African country that is being fucked over terribly.
Where did Iraq rank on the "fucked over terribly" ranking?
JOHNNY1PROUDCANADIAN @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:18 pm
The U.S only invades poor countries
JOHNNY1PROUDCANADIAN @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:19 pm
mmmm....since WW2 , they've attacked 72 countries
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 Next