Web of cold-blooded lies
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next
The Hoser @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:20 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
Nevertheless, the Democratic leader of Iraq will most likely be a puppet. I still think that if the US has plans for freeing a country from a dictator, they should have started in North Korea or maybe an African country that is being fucked over terribly.
Where did Iraq rank on the "fucked over terribly" ranking?
Pretty damn high, but in Africa things are happening on a much wider scale, in Iraqi people were killed for no reason, but in Africa entire villages can be exterminated on the whim of some crazed dictator, yet the US does nothing to install Democracy in the poorest area on earth. All I'm saying is that the US had better places to start than Iraq.
The Hoser @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:21 pm
johnny2 johnny2:
mmmm....since WW2 , they've attacked 72 countries
And most of those countries more than once, and they were invaded to install American corporations and secure other American interests, not to help the populace.
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:24 pm
johnny2 johnny2:
The U.S only invades poor countries
Why invade rich countries? Obviously they're doing something right and don't need help.
The Hoser @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:26 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
johnny2 johnny2:
The U.S only invades poor countries
Why invade rich countries? Obviously they're doing something right and don't need help.
Well, the poor countries that were invaded are still poor. Obviously America is doing somthing wrong.
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:29 pm
You can bring success to people, but you can't always make people successful.
The Hoser @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:30 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
You can bring success to people, but you can't always make people successful.
No harm done if they're still at the status quo afterwards.
No harm done if they're still at the status quo afterwards.
If it's not going to work, why invade poor countries and have thousands die to American WMDs etc?
Scape @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:30 pm
In the form of a stepped up bombing campaign?
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:32 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
You can bring success to people, but you can't always make people successful.
If it's not going to work, why invade poor countries and have thousands die to American WMDs etc?
You don't know unless you try.
JOHNNY1PROUDCANADIAN @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:33 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
johnny2 johnny2:
mmmm....since WW2 , they've attacked 72 countries
And most of those countries more than once, and they were invaded to install American corporations and secure other American interests, not to help the populace.
DAM STRAIGHT
The Hoser @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:35 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
You can bring success to people, but you can't always make people successful.
If it's not going to work, why invade poor countries and have thousands die to American WMDs etc?
You don't know unless you try.
But America has tried. And America has failed. So why do Americans persist when all they achieve is the needless death of thousands? Being poor is one thing, and you've said it yourself several times, death is much worse.
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:36 pm
johnny2 johnny2:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
johnny2 johnny2:
mmmm....since WW2 , they've attacked 72 countries
And most of those countries more than once, and they were invaded to install American corporations and secure other American interests, not to help the populace.
DAM STRAIGHT
Gotta love colonialism in the information age.
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:36 pm
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
You can bring success to people, but you can't always make people successful.
If it's not going to work, why invade poor countries and have thousands die to American WMDs etc?
You don't know unless you try.
But America has tried. And America has failed. So why do Americans persist when all they achieve is the needless death of thousands? Being poor is one thing, and you've said it yourself several times, death is much worse.
We've succeeded sometimes so therefore we will go on trying.
The Hoser @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:37 pm
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
The Dark Canuck The Dark Canuck:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
You can bring success to people, but you can't always make people successful.
If it's not going to work, why invade poor countries and have thousands die to American WMDs etc?
You don't know unless you try.
But America has tried. And America has failed. So why do Americans persist when all they achieve is the needless death of thousands? Being poor is one thing, and you've said it yourself several times, death is much worse.
We've succeeded sometimes so therefore we will go on trying.
Well, would you care to provide me a list of countries in which America succeeded? Not out of doubt, but more out of personal curiosity.
Constantinople @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:43 pm
I am probably not familiar with all of them, but I will list what I can think of:
Eastern Europe and the Baltic States
Kuwait
Greece
Turkey
Iraq
JOHNNY1PROUDCANADIAN @ Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:46 pm
Iraq?????? 
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next