Canada Kicks Ass
Women are inferior

REPLY

1  2  3  4  5  Next



Legion @ Mon May 02, 2005 6:34 pm

Ok throughout history its been known that the women are inferior both mentally and physically. Just recently however just like the gay movement going on people try to say that women are equal to men in every area which is simply not true. So I thought I would start a new topic and see just how many agree with me, since nobody has to worry about someone they know here calling them politcally incorrect. See this is the new witch hunt here. Society hunts down anyone who is not PC, and labels them a bigot, and racist. Well I am here to speak the truth that women are inferior humans and are better at loving nurturing and cooking for men.

   



canucker @ Mon May 02, 2005 6:44 pm

Legion Legion:
Ok throughout history its been known that the women are inferior both mentally and physically. Just recently however just like the gay movement going on people try to say that women are equal to men in every area which is simply not true. So I thought I would start a new topic and see just how many agree with me, since nobody has to worry about someone they know here calling them politcally incorrect. See this is the new witch hunt here. Society hunts down anyone who is not PC, and labels them a bigot, and racist. Well I am here to speak the truth that women are inferior humans and are better at loving nurturing and cooking for men.


PDT_Armataz_01_19 What a bunch of BULL!!! Now I have NO RESPECT for you what-so-ever!!! ASS!

That's all I'm gonna say for now....

   



Legion @ Mon May 02, 2005 6:48 pm

Prof Greenfield a professor of mine says that the more 'emotion' you experience, the less 'mind' you have. Now, which of the two possible genders, statistically speaking, experiences more emotion - and would claim to?
Mmm! The female gender, one would suspect.
And it follows, therefore, that, statistically speaking, this gender has less 'mind'. It is less in 'contact' with it.
Putting this another way: Relatively speaking, compared to men, women are less often 'accessing the past, or the future, or anything 'inside' ' - statistically, that is.Well, that's what follows from Professor Greenfield's observations.And most men and women would agree with them, openly, if they weren't having to be so politically correct.
Women, thus, statistically speaking, function less 'mindfully' than men, or, putting it less euphemistically, less 'intelligently'.
It cannot have escaped even the most ardent feminist's notice that it is men who are the focused, the possessed, and the obsessed. It is men who push forward the boundaries of science, music, technology and art. It is men who build great cities and great religions.It is men who tinker well into the night, studying and prising apart the boundaries of even the most obscure and intractable. I know one man who spent six years studying locust legs. Not locusts. Locust LEGS! FOR SIX YEARS!

I knew another who was a mathematician and who struggled daily, FOR YEARS, with some obscure problem in which only one other person in the entire world seemed to have any interest - and it wasn't me.

Just look at any science programme on TV and notice the 'workers' labouring in the various scientific fields. The 'experts'. The ones who sneak into their laboratories even on Christmas Day to skulk around engines, chemicals, computers or insects. The ones who spend hour upon hour, year upon year, squashed into their little rooms to study the contents of test-tubes or tissues. The ones who wander into the most hostile and desolate parts of the planet to scrub around for clues, artifacts and ideas.

They're nearly all men!

It is men who lead, explore, push forward and calculate.

And, to the extent that intelligence is based on environment, as opposed to genetics, or based upon learning and studying, as opposed to 'emotionalising' (and, so, losing 'mind') then the intelligence of men must creep forward more quickly, and further, than that of women, throughout their lives - because, statistically speaking, they choose to take on more of the intelligent-provoking 'environment', and they interact with it in much more of an objective and emotionless way (i.e. with more 'mind').

When it comes to intelligence, men have got what it takes. They drive in straight lines, they focus their attention, they do not multitask, they obsess, and they do not spend so much time emotionalising.

   



The Hoser @ Mon May 02, 2005 6:49 pm

I seriously can't believe this. I always knew Legion was a dumbass, but this is just lame. It has been proven countless time's that women are in fact SMARTER then guys, especially you. Need I assume that your the type who beats one's wife?

In fact I'll say that women are much better human beings. Women are proven to be clearer thinkers, pyhsically more endurant, and alot more fit to lead than men ever were.

"They once had god given grace. But we made them take vows to serve and obey us. How scared were we?"
- Jeffery Gains

That about says it all.

   



Mustang1 @ Mon May 02, 2005 6:50 pm

Legion Legion:
Ok throughout history its been known that the women are inferior both mentally and physically. Just recently however just like the gay movement going on people try to say that women are equal to men in every area which is simply not true. So I thought I would start a new topic and see just how many agree with me, since nobody has to worry about someone they know here calling them politcally incorrect. See this is the new witch hunt here. Society hunts down anyone who is not PC, and labels them a bigot, and racist. Well I am here to speak the truth that women are inferior humans and are better at loving nurturing and cooking for men.


This archaic, uneducated, pedestrian worldview smacks of intellectual simplicity. It’s neither provocative nor relevant nor “debatable” – in fact, it’s a joke conjured up by a weak mind.

Keep on Truckin’ in 2005! :twisted:

   



canucker @ Mon May 02, 2005 6:53 pm

Your statements show just how idiotic you are Legion.

   



The Hoser @ Mon May 02, 2005 6:54 pm

Legion, your a fucking idiot. lol, im fucking 13 and I'm more mature then you. You make no sense, you just continue down your path of bigatry and leave us the fuck out of it, k?

   



Legion @ Mon May 02, 2005 6:56 pm

SadBlue SadBlue:
Legion, your a fucking idiot. lol, im fucking 13 and I'm more mature then you. You make no sense, you just continue down your path of bigatry and leave us the fuck out of it, k?


Bigotry? Thats all you have, just label me. Whos the bigot now.

   



Legion @ Mon May 02, 2005 6:59 pm

IceOwl IceOwl:
Legion Legion:
Ok throughout history its been known that the women are inferior both mentally and physically.


What a stupid thing to say. I guess those female olympic weight lifters are just lifting nerf, and Hypatia was just a flaky astrologist.

$1:
Just recently however just like the gay movement going on people try to say that women are equal to men in every area which is simply not true.


Prove it. (Yep, there's that evidence thing again. Bites you in the ass every time.)

$1:
So I thought I would start a new topic and see just how many agree with me, since nobody has to worry about someone they know here calling them politcally incorrect. See this is the new witch hunt here. Society hunts down anyone who is not PC, and labels them a bigot, and racist.


Well, if you are a racist bigot, that's what we'll call you. So far, you've done a pretty good job on the bigot part. You don't have to go all the way and prove the racist part too, though.

$1:
Well I am here to speak the truth


Truth?! Get serious. You wouldn't know truth if it gave you an upper-cut to the jaw.

$1:
that women are inferior humans and are better at loving nurturing and cooking for men.


I think Legion is an inferior human.


I am talking natural strength and intelligence. Women have to work harder to get to the level superior men are at. If they work hard enough they can come close, such women olympic lifters but its more difficult becuase they are a inferior species.

   



Legion @ Mon May 02, 2005 7:04 pm

For example, lets use Firefighters. The standards for firefighters required that the firemen be able to lift heavy hoses and what not up long stairs. Well after womens lib fire stations were made to hire women even if they couldnt perform intense tasks that decades before were required. In other words businesses and services such as these have to lower their standards to hire women and keep it equal. I dont know about you but if im in a burning building I want a man that can lift enough weight to come save me and not have some small peitie women who cannot even do 20 pushups try to make it up there. Lets not lower the bar people keep it high and if the women cant get in ......oh well.

   



kal @ Mon May 02, 2005 7:11 pm

Legion Legion:
Just look at any science programme on TV and notice the 'workers' labouring in the various scientific fields. The 'experts'. The ones who sneak into their laboratories even on Christmas Day to skulk around engines, chemicals, computers or insects. The ones who spend hour upon hour, year upon year, squashed into their little rooms to study the contents of test-tubes or tissues. The ones who wander into the most hostile and desolate parts of the planet to scrub around for clues, artifacts and ideas.

They're nearly all men!


Hey! Earth to Idiot (sorry, I don't mean to insult any idiots by calling this fucker one) you know why most of those fields are male dominated? Because women have only been allowed to study in the sciences in the past 20-30 years. That's not very long. It takes a long time to get well established in the science field. I would also like to see you mention the names of those science shows, because I know on most of the shows I watch this is not the case. Either that or these women are forced to stay at home and tend to the children by their fucker husbands that have the same kind of archaic 12th century thinking you do. Oh...woopse, sorry I must apologize again to anyone who THINKS by suggesting this maggot does...

   



Arctic_Menace @ Mon May 02, 2005 7:21 pm

Legion Legion:
Ok throughout history its been known that the women are inferior both mentally and physically. Just recently however just like the gay movement going on people try to say that women are equal to men in every area which is simply not true. So I thought I would start a new topic and see just how many agree with me, since nobody has to worry about someone they know here calling them politcally incorrect. See this is the new witch hunt here. Society hunts down anyone who is not PC, and labels them a bigot, and racist. Well I am here to speak the truth that women are inferior humans and are better at loving nurturing and cooking for men.


Image

Image

Image

   



Legion @ Mon May 02, 2005 7:22 pm

Anothe example how women are inferior. Companies have to deal with Maturnity leave , that means about 7 months of a pregant womens time she has to take off work. Its not fair to a male who has a better resume and is more qualified. Most employers dont acutally believe women are more qualified. They hire becuase if they dont there will be a lawsuit. Now this is mainly again for the physical jobs for example police work. The costs the police department money becuase they have to pay her while she takes a vacation. Nature meant it to be, she should stay home and not work.

   



Tman1 @ Mon May 02, 2005 7:22 pm

Hey what anime show is that?

   



REPLY

1  2  3  4  5  Next