U.S. among top 4 executioners: Amnesty International
AdamNF AdamNF:
The USA pays on countires all the time. Forign aid during the cold war was the USA paying dictators to be on thier side/
You're right, and Canada never supports dictators. I suppose Cuba isn't a dictatorship, right????
I can't believe you are so stupid that you don't see that the US was paying those countries to be on our side so that they wouldn't be on the side of the Soviet Union, our enemy. The more countries the Soviet Union had, the more of a threat they became, and we wanted to stop the spread of our enemy.
AdamNF AdamNF:
Yeah i mean they are not sheep..unlike Americans.
Most Americans think it is unpatriotic to question their goverment, they think its treason to speak out agasint you're goverment..sheep!
Yeah, you are really a fucking idiot. I question my government all the time, but I know that it's not going to do anything because the country is split 50/50 and right now the conservative bunch has the upper hand. Oh, there's no Canadians that are sheep.....you're a big sheep, because you are just a part of the unoriginal herd who goes around bitching about the US. Nothing new about you, nothing original, no new ideas, just another mindless sheep....
AdamNF AdamNF:
The USA put Batista (Dictator of Cuba before Castro) into power. Cuba was filled with American clubs and hot spots for the American wealthy, batista and his American backed goverment/militia cntroled Cuba with an iron fist. Castro a Cuba law student wanted to overthrough this evil dictator the USA has put in place, after years and year they did, and Castro kicked all American business out. ever since then the USA has put an embargo on cuba. No the facts before you speak
Yeah, I suppose Cuba is a great place to live, with all those people fleeing the country all the time to get to the US. Castro has people executed, sent his prisoners to the US, and has biological weapons programs which the soviet union was helping him with. Castro also wanted to arm his country with nukes to bomb the US. Castro allows no one to have free speech, and he is a dictator....
AdamNF AdamNF:
What the hell kind of sentance is that.
I can't believe I'm talking to someone who can't even spell sentence....
AdamNF AdamNF:
You sure sentance is doesnt have an a.
Anyways, I never said Cuba was a good place to live, Castro was currupted by power, he meant well, he wanted to give the country back to the people. Same thing happened in Russia.
[Edi]
Also the USA planed on invading Cuba countless times, the USA is ALWAYS the agreser
Why don't you look up the reasons why the US has wanted to attack Cuba instead of labeling them the invader. Also, there is no such word as sentance.
AdamNF @ Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:23 pm
You sure sentance is doesnt have an a.
Anyways, I never said Cuba was a good place to live, Castro was currupted by power, he meant well, he wanted to give the country back to the people. Same thing happened in Russia.
[Edi]
Also the USA planed on invading Cuba countless times, the USA is ALWAYS the agreser
Castro took out the government in place, started to put in social plans, and kicked out US companies, thus fucking over the US. Castro did not do any of this in a friendly manner, and he was the one who started to worsen the relationship with the US. How did his method even help Cuba? Cuba is a very poor country now, and who knows how great of a country they could have been with US business and so on.
None of Castros plans even helped the country, and now the country has a leader who hates the US, never wanted friendly relations with them, and cares more about being social than providing for his people....
Rev_Blair Rev_Blair:
Doug:
I offered you a variety of sources. I'm sure if you bother to go check those sources instead of spending your time yelling and screaming about how the sources aren't valid, you will come to understand what is really going on. You'll also find links in many of my older posts. Again, that would require you to do some reading on your own though.
You've said you don't have cable, but you do have the internet. Here are some other sources you can follow. The BBC, The Guardian, The Nation, CBC, Dangerous Citizen, Project Censored. They are all available through your computer and they carry indepth coverage of the illegal war in Iraq.
Notice how I didn't put in links? If you really want to know, you will find them. I'm betting that won't be good enough for you though. You seem to prefer to have information spoon fed to you, never checking the validity of what is said or wondering if there are other viewpoints that make more sense.
[url=<p> <ahref=
http://afghan-tribunal.3005.net/english/>]Here[/url] is a link for you. It's about a tribunal that that tried and convicted your president. [url=<ahref=http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm>]Here[/url] is one about his father was tried and convicted.
Do you think maybe that's why your president is afraid to sign the ICC Convention? Because he knows that he's a criminal and could be charged? It's the only reason that makes real sense...he knows he's a war criminal.
Wow, you get all your news from the liberal press? I would say check out all those stations + the conservative stations, if you really want to form an opinion. Hahaha, I can't help but laugh that you listed the BBC, who have been in scandel lately. I check the guardian myself, but because I check out conservative news, which I actually find tells alot of the same stories, I can usually see the bias in both. Checking out only one side of the political spectrum will make you a biased ass.....
It's like someone saying "hey, if you guys want real news, check out the
www.kkk.com, it has alot of great stories" I mean come on, if someone only checks out one side of the story, they will form an opinion that is based on that one side, just like you who only list liberal newspapers....
Doug:
I offered you a variety of sources. I'm sure if you bother to go check those sources instead of spending your time yelling and screaming about how the sources aren't valid, you will come to understand what is really going on. You'll also find links in many of my older posts. Again, that would require you to do some reading on your own though.
You've said you don't have cable, but you do have the internet. Here are some other sources you can follow. The BBC, The Guardian, The Nation, CBC, Dangerous Citizen, Project Censored. They are all available through your computer and they carry indepth coverage of the illegal war in Iraq.
Notice how I didn't put in links? If you really want to know, you will find them. I'm betting that won't be good enough for you though. You seem to prefer to have information spoon fed to you, never checking the validity of what is said or wondering if there are other viewpoints that make more sense.
[url=<p> <ahref= http://afghan-tribunal.3005.net/english/>]Here[/url] is a link for you. It's about a tribunal that that tried and convicted your president. [url=<ahref=http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm>]Here[/url] is one about his father was tried and convicted.
Do you think maybe that's why your president is afraid to sign the ICC Convention? Because he knows that he's a criminal and could be charged? It's the only reason that makes real sense...he knows he's a war criminal.
Rev_Blair Rev_Blair:
Doug:
I offered you a variety of sources. I'm sure if you bother to go check those sources instead of spending your time yelling and screaming about how the sources aren't valid, you will come to understand what is really going on. You'll also find links in many of my older posts. Again, that would require you to do some reading on your own though.
You've said you don't have cable, but you do have the internet. Here are some other sources you can follow. The BBC, The Guardian, The Nation, CBC, Dangerous Citizen, Project Censored. They are all available through your computer and they carry indepth coverage of the illegal war in Iraq.
Notice how I didn't put in links? If you really want to know, you will find them. I'm betting that won't be good enough for you though. You seem to prefer to have information spoon fed to you, never checking the validity of what is said or wondering if there are other viewpoints that make more sense.
[url=<p> <ahref=
http://afghan-tribunal.3005.net/english/>]Here[/url] is a link for you. It's about a tribunal that that tried and convicted your president. [url=<ahref=http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm>]Here[/url] is one about his father was tried and convicted.
Do you think maybe that's why your president is afraid to sign the ICC Convention? Because he knows that he's a criminal and could be charged? It's the only reason that makes real sense...he knows he's a war criminal.
So wait, let me get this, they were trying to convict george bush for attacking afghanistan? So I guess all those terrorist training camps and the taliban were imaginary. Sorry a couple civilians died, but don't even tell me that you people are going to start saying the war in afghanistan is unjustified. Guess the Canadians there should be convicted also....
They tried him for commiting war crimes, Johnny. The US is a signatory to several international conventions on warfare. When the break the rules in those conventions, they contravene the law.
There's another commission being put together to investigate and try the crimes currently being committed in Iraq.
Your president has broken several international, US domestic, and US military laws in Iraq. He's a war criminal.
I mentioned the mercenaries operating in Iraq a little earlier. That, of course, met with opposition because nobody wants to admit their country is using scum to do the work of the military. Anyway, here is a little more on that from The Guardian.
Pathos @ Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:37 pm
who tryed bush for war crimes.when?
I provided the link, look it up and read it. Here it is again.
Johnnybgoodaaaaa Johnnybgoodaaaaa:
Cuba is a very poor country now, and who knows how great of a country they could have been with US business and so on.
....
LOL The American mafia pretty well ran the country that and US BIG BUSINESS paid off Batista to give them free riegn to do what they wanted to do.. So dont say Cuba was well off before.. they just exchanged one kind of dictator for another... BFD