Do Canadian Muslims belong on Reservations or in Colonies
Abbas @ Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:21 pm
haha, ok, if I knew profanity is what Canadians like then I should always start my conversations with insulting names. I mean I already do for hwacker but I didn't know people actually dig that.
USCAdad @ Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:23 pm
Abbas Abbas:
USCAdad USCAdad:
What f'en socialists. Here I am working my ass off trying to figure out a way to earn a reservation for myself and someone is willing to just give one away. 
I think good intelligence funding, more scrutiny on immigration, longer wait times for citizenship, and education for the ones that come to know what they're getting into (what does it mean to move to the West?) and how to function in our society would be a good start.
I think good intelligence funding, more scrutiny on immigration, longer wait times for citizenship, and education for the ones that come to know what they're getting into (what does it mean to move to the West?) and how to function in our society would be a good start.
Agreed, as long as, this education doesn't strip them of their religion for example "You have to hold Canadian oath before your religion" other then that everything is gully.
Can you live without a Caliphate? Can you treat gays, sluts, drunks and dogs with respect? Allowing them the same privileges as your self or is that an affront to your religion (don't worry, I know that there are quite a few Christians that fail such criteria).
Abbas @ Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:48 pm
Can you live without a Caliphate?
hmm, I think you might be mistaking me for a Shia, I am actually sunni and Caliphate were our beloved Prophets followers that were also his friends. We believe Muhammed (PBUH) was the last of the Prophets and no one can lead the Muslim nation after him. Yes, we had a few caliphates that guided people after the death of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) but they were only a guide, not a leader.
$1:
Can you treat gays, sluts, drunks and dogs with respect?
We can treat them with respect but we cannot accept homosexuality. Drunks, once again we can stand them but cannot accept alcohol. Dogs? lol
$1:
Allowing them the same privileges as your self or is that an affront to your religion (don't worry, I know that there are quite a few Christians that fail such criteria).
Well, in my personal opinion, yea, they would and should get the same privileges except I am not too sure how Dogs would go about voting. Anyways, thats my personal opinion and no Islam does not accept homosexuality or Alcohol and yes we are fine with Dogs, we just can't have them lick our clothing or live inside the house. They are suppose to be protectors of mankind, not our children.
grainfedprairieboy @ Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:52 pm
I would consider reservations or internment camps of liberals however.
I've always had deep reservations about liberals anyway.
USCAdad @ Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:52 pm
Abbas Abbas:
Well, in my personal opinion, yea, they would and should get the same privileges except I am not too sure how Dogs would go about voting. Anyways, thats my personal opinion and no Islam does not accept homosexuality or Alcohol and yes we are fine with Dogs, we just can't have them lick our clothing or live inside the house. They are suppose to be protectors of mankind, not our children.
You can choose who you annoint but if you can't coexist.... "Dogs" was a reference to a few cases lately where Muslim Cab drivers claim a religious exemption for picking up Blind people with support dogs. My view is the drivers in question are lazy and don't want to have to clean their cab after having a dog on board and hide behind their religion, but I've heard that this is a common belief with Somali Muslims.
Abbas @ Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:55 pm
USCAdad USCAdad:
Abbas Abbas:
Well, in my personal opinion, yea, they would and should get the same privileges except I am not too sure how Dogs would go about voting. Anyways, thats my personal opinion and no Islam does not accept homosexuality or Alcohol and yes we are fine with Dogs, we just can't have them lick our clothing or live inside the house. They are suppose to be protectors of mankind, not our children.
You can choose who you annoint but if you can't coexist.... "Dogs" was a reference to a few cases lately where Muslim Cab drivers claim a religious exemption for picking up Blind people with support dogs. My view is the drivers in question are lazy and don't want to have to clean their cab after having a dog on board and hide behind their religion, but I've heard that this is a common belief with Somali Muslims.
Oh, I thought you were speaking of Dogs in general. Yes, they are right because if dog touches our clothing then it is dirty and not just dirty, we have to take off the clothing and put on something until the cloth is washed a few times. I am not sure of the science behind this but there is prob an explanation somewhere. Sry dude, I am at home and pulled a 8 hour shift so I don't feel like looking too hard right now, I hope you understand.
Schleihauf @ Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:49 pm
If thats not xenophobia then I don't know what is.
thefactremains @ Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:26 pm
Why can't UN create a country, for them. Since every nation in the country don't want them.
Sapper @ Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:25 am
Abbas Abbas:
USCAdad USCAdad:
Abbas Abbas:
Well, in my personal opinion, yea, they would and should get the same privileges except I am not too sure how Dogs would go about voting. Anyways, thats my personal opinion and no Islam does not accept homosexuality or Alcohol and yes we are fine with Dogs, we just can't have them lick our clothing or live inside the house. They are suppose to be protectors of mankind, not our children.
You can choose who you annoint but if you can't coexist.... "Dogs" was a reference to a few cases lately where Muslim Cab drivers claim a religious exemption for picking up Blind people with support dogs. My view is the drivers in question are lazy and don't want to have to clean their cab after having a dog on board and hide behind their religion, but I've heard that this is a common belief with Somali Muslims.
Oh, I thought you were speaking of Dogs in general. Yes, they are right because if dog touches our clothing then it is dirty and not just dirty, we have to take off the clothing and put on something until the cloth is washed a few times. I am not sure of the science behind this but there is prob an explanation somewhere. Sry dude, I am at home and pulled a 8 hour shift so I don't feel like looking too hard right now, I hope you understand.
Ok! That does it! I'll never convert now! Any religion that won't let you touch a dog is just plain wrong!!!! Maybe Your profit got the spelling wrong? Ever think of that? DOG!
northstar @ Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:57 am
I have no idea why this question is even being raised. These are immigrants, were is their any historical findings when immigrants are in the same catagory as native Indians?
The real question is how long are we going to be stupid enough to allow a rapidly growing population of people who dispise our culture to continue to flood our country and use it as a foundation for their new ALLAH inspired community.
-Mario- @ Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:03 am
thefactremains thefactremains:
Why can't UN create a country, for them. Since every nation in the country don't want them.
Peeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaleeeeeeeeeeeeeze...
They already have their own countries... shit hit the fan when the UN gave the Jews Israel. The UN did not consider a lot of factors. One of them is that Jerusalem is an Islamic holy city, the 6th Islamic law -> something about enemies of Islam and dying for your God. Islam has 3 holy city, Mekka being the Holiest , Jerusalem and Medina. Go back and see the north and south american history... maybe we should all be living in Europe right now.
-Mario- @ Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:05 am
northstar northstar:
who dispise our culture to continue to flood our country and use it as a foundation for their new ALLAH inspired community.
Only a small amount of them despise our culture...
BartSimpson @ Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:49 am
-Mario- -Mario-:
northstar northstar:
who dispise our culture to continue to flood our country and use it as a foundation for their new ALLAH inspired community.
Only a small amount of them despise our culture...
Which is why 40% of muslims in the UK favour imposing sharia law on the UK.
http://inpolitically.blogspot.com/2007/ ... anada.html
Mario, you're drinking someone else's Kool-Aid.
-Mario- @ Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:53 am
Bart... you are quoting somebody's blog. 
BartSimpson @ Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:08 am
-Mario- -Mario-:
Bart... you are quoting somebody's blog.
Yes, and it references a poll that is public domain.
40% of muslims in the UK would like to impose sharia law on the UK.
No matter how you slice it, that's not a small number of people who don't like our culture. Considering that similar numbers of Canadian muslims want sharia law in Ontario I'd also be disinclined to dismiss them as a minority.