Richard Dawkins Admits Life Was Intelligently Designed
roger-roger @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Durandal Durandal:
Eisensapper Eisensapper:
He was speculating on how someone could prove ID. He didnt say thats how it happened
No, he said Intelligent Desing is true, and he presented one of the hypothesis Atheists came up with to avoid admitting that the Intelligent Designer is God. Another hypothesis Dawkins thinks may be valid is the multi-universe theory :
Dr. Frank Turek on Atheist Guru Richard Dawkins
Basically it's the same thing, exept the aliens come from an other universe (!?!) instead of our universe. Obviously we have zero evidence for any of Dawkin's speculative theories.
$1:
BTW Expelled has been harpooned
Keep trying.
Learn to Discern - Expelled Ben's Bad Scientists Scientists Againsy Free Inquiry$1:
as probably the worst documentary ever conceived.
Rather the contrary. http://www.academicfreedompetition.com/
No more troll food for you.
Hmm 10% and 3.7 out of 10 even with your bible thumping idiots screwing with the poll thats the best they could do?
Durandal @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:05 pm
Eisensapper Eisensapper:
No to mention he says about 3 times, no one knows how life was started.
We Christians know how life was started, you Atheists don't know. Whatever the amount of « maybe » and « perhaps » Dawkins includes in his responses, he makes statements on things he doesn't know and ends up making a fool of himself anyway.
roger-roger @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:12 pm
No you Christians have a theory on how life started, it involves a infallible deity, some clay, ribs, talking snakes and a garden. Abiogenesis mean while is struggling to prove how elements and chemicals can evolve into self replicating proteins. I wonder which one should be taken as fact.... this is not to say God had no hand in creating the Universe. You can believe what you want, I will keep following science, it seems to be doing quite well so far. You, and Stein apparently, forget that Dawkins is a evolutionary biologist, and not a Abiogenesis.
Axeman @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:13 pm
We atheists don't know how life started, but we DO know that it all started from the same thing. Life on earth, today, evolved from that state and continues to evolve.
poquas @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:15 pm
I assume that getting Durandal to be in any objective about this is akin to beating the proverbial dead horse.
fifeboy @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:15 pm
Axeman Axeman:
...the difference being that "Intelligent Design"
is a theory and evolution is a "Fact".
fifeboy @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:21 pm
Durandal Durandal:
Say, is that Danny De Veto?
roger-roger @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:22 pm
yup
Durandal @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:23 pm
Eisensapper Eisensapper:
Hmm 10% and 3.7 out of 10
Of course the evolutionist establishment gives bad ratings, what do you expect ?
Yet even the leftist Wikipedia says it was successuful :
$1:
Expelled opened in 1,052 theaters, more than any other documentary before it, and grossed over $2,900,000 in its first weekend, the third biggest opening for a documentary. As of May 13, 2008 it had earned over $7 million, making it the twelfth-highest-grossing documentary film in the United States in nominal dollars, from 1982 to that date.
But then it goes on :
$1:
The general media response to the film has been largely unfavorable. It received an 8% meta-score from Rotten Tomatoes.
Negative media response ? Not suprising.
Smoking Gun Proof there is an Atheist Media Bias
Durandal @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:25 pm
poquas poquas:
Is Durandal in some way related to Ziggy?
Nope.
Tricks @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:32 pm
Haha religion funny.
fifeboy @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:32 pm
poquas poquas:
Eisensapper Eisensapper:
I highly doubt it, what would give you that idea?
THey're both on the same end of the Fruit Loop scale.
Hey, leave Ziggy alone, he is the way he is because of having been chased by too many polar bears. Talk about proof of Lamarckian evolution.
sandorski @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:35 pm
poquas poquas:
I assume that getting Durandal to be in any objective about this is akin to beating the proverbial dead horse.
The "dead horse" is not really Dead. It is merely resting until Resurrection.
roger-roger @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:35 pm
Durandal Durandal:
Eisensapper Eisensapper:
Hmm 10% and 3.7 out of 10
Of course the evolutionist establishment gives bad ratings, what do you expect ?
Yet even the leftist Wikipedia says it was successuful :
$1:
Expelled opened in 1,052 theaters, more than any other documentary before it, and grossed over $2,900,000 in its first weekend, the third biggest opening for a documentary. As of May 13, 2008 it had earned over $7 million, making it the twelfth-highest-grossing documentary film in the United States in nominal dollars, from 1982 to that date.
But then it goes on :
$1:
The general media response to the film has been largely unfavorable. It received an 8% meta-score from Rotten Tomatoes.
Negative media response ? Not suprising.
Smoking Gun Proof there is an Atheist Media BiasYou missed this part:
$1:
Reviewing Expelled's opening box office figures, Nikki Finke of the LA Weekly wrote that considering the number of screens showing the film, the ticket sales were "feeble," demonstrating "there wasn't any pent-up demand for the film despite an aggressive publicity campaign
BAHAHA Religious beat this peice of crap to death!
roger-roger @ Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:37 pm
Just admit it expelled was a mockumentary that thought it was a documentary.