Canada Kicks Ass
Richard Dawkins Admits Life Was Intelligently Designed

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6



fifeboy @ Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:50 pm

ziggy ziggy:


Reaction to environment?
Or deep back in it's brain it might have the "memories" as Mogur would say.
Their both Richardsons ground squirrels,identical to look at except for size.
But they are not.http://canadianbiodiversity.mcgill.ca/english/species/mammals/rodentia.htm

   



roger-roger @ Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:08 pm

Bibbi Bibbi:
Eisensapper Eisensapper:
Whats wrong with that? Why should Homosapiens be on other planets?


Well, to answer a question with a question, why should homosapiens be exclusive to Earth in an immense universe? Why should one small pin prick of a planet be more important than the rest of the cosmos?

Its not more important. Again why would humans be on other planets in the universe? That's what is confusing me...

No one is really saying humans are exclusive to earth, if there is another planet exactly like earth out in the galaxy there is quite possibly the exact same life on it. What are you getting at?

   



rawmeat @ Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:06 pm

Durandal Durandal:
The famous Atheist guru Richard Dawkins, author of "The God Delusion", admits there is plenty of scientific evidence proving that life was intelligently designed, but he refuses to admit the Intelligent Designer is God, instead he says that extra-terrestrials created and planted the first form of life on earth !

See here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoncJBrrdQ8

It is a part of the documentary "Expelled - No Intelligence Allowed" that denounces the censorship of creationist scientists and the evolutionists attack on academic freedom.

Super Trailer here : http://www.expelledthemovie.com/playground.php

Full documentary here : http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid= ... 2896741579

And he's got millions of fans...
XD

Congratulations on totaly missing his point....

   



Axeman @ Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:25 am

While we're on the topic of Darwin, there's a good piece in the February issue of National Geographic.

   



Bacardi4206 @ Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:59 am

Durandal Durandal:
poquas poquas:
I find that much more believable than any organized religion's creationist hokum


Yeah sure... « evolution is science and creation is religion »... nah that's science-fiction. :wink:

Man, Atheists who accuse Christians of being « deluded » and « non-rational » while at the same time use extra-terrestrials to fill holes in their darwinist theory are just pissingly funny. :mrgreen:



Nobody said they believe extra-terrestrials created the earth and life. Evolution is about cells evolving into life and life evolving into more complex life.

That's what most atheists believe in. If darwin believed in ET's or not does not reflect on atheism. Try again?

   



JMillar @ Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:05 am

Wow! Durandal, like so many other believers, has selectively censored and misrepresented the clip he posted, in a lame and ridiculous attempt at arguing something. If you watch the clip you see Ben Stein pressing the question "who" or "how" did the universe come to be. Once Dawkins explains that nobody knows, and Stein seems to accept this, Stein then asks this question:

"What do you think is the possibility that intelligent design might turn out to be, uhm, the answer to some issues of genetics or of evolution?"

This is not a question about God, or about the truth of christian versions of Intelligent Design. It's a question about how you might construe a theory about intelligent creatures being responsible for genes found on Earth. That is the question Dawkins answers.

So Dawkins answers the question honestly. He says that if you really want to believe in some sort of Intelligent Design theory, then it could possibly take the form of a theory about aliens "who have already evolved through a Darwinian process", placing genetic material on Earth. He denies the probability of God, as he always does, and he points out that Intelligent Design would not be the answer to the most obvious question still remaining, namely "Who created the aliens?"

Nowhere in his answer does Dawkins claim that Intelligent design is highly probable. Furthermore, his answer is most obviously NOT (to anyone who takes the time to listen to it) presenting a theory of Intelligent Design that is even remotely similar to the Intelligent Design theory that believers support.

What Durandal has clearly missed in Dawkins answer is that he is openly making fun of Intelligent Design theory. He is reducing Intelligent Design theory to both an absurdity, and a theory that begs the question of the origins of life.

But, of course, anyone who has studied theology seriously knows that Intelligent Design has been debunked time and time again throughout the ages. It is not a modern theory. It was proposed in the Middle Ages by Aquinas.

Maybe the problem with believers is that they're often not used to listening to the details. I suppose that comes about by being told the answers to every interesting question that might come up in life, before they get a chance to think about them openly and honestly. My advice: step into the light and question your beliefs for once...with an open mind.

   



Hawkins @ Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:04 am

It says that he has faith, and his faith differs from the Christians.

   



Guy_Fawkes @ Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:21 am

I dont think you can call it faith....

   



Akhenaten @ Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:48 am

"Richard Dawkins Admits Life Was Intelligently Designed"

No. He didn't.

Akhenaten loves it when he witnesses Christans embracing lying.

He is also amused to see their theories, stances and interpretations 'evolve' over time, dictated by the envronment they exist in, in order to survive. If the Church didn't 'evolve' in order to adapt to the changing environment it would be extinct.


Can anyone here please point me to one single example of anything in the universe that does not evolve? Everything 'evolves' and there is nothing that came from nothing.

   



Hawkins @ Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:02 pm

Guy_Fawkes Guy_Fawkes:
I dont think you can call it faith....


Why not. BTW even your this statement itself is a reflection of your own faith.

   



Zipperfish @ Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:57 pm

Hawkins Hawkins:
Guy_Fawkes Guy_Fawkes:
I dont think you can call it faith....


Why not. BTW even your this statement itself is a reflection of your own faith.


There's different kinds of belief. If one person belives that cup, knocked off a table, will fly up and the hit the roof, is that necessarily equal to the person who believes that it will fall down and hit the ground?

   



Guy_Fawkes @ Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:07 am

Hawkins Hawkins:
Guy_Fawkes Guy_Fawkes:
I dont think you can call it faith....


Why not. BTW even your this statement itself is a reflection of your own faith.

Listen to what Zip is saying.

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6