ABC Warmunists Claimed New York to be Underwater in 2015
Tyler_1 @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:24 am
MeganC MeganC:
Public_Domain Public_Domain:
every user you're talking to has been here for almost a decade, or more.
I've been on here 4 years and I still feel new!
New and Shiney!
Zipperfish @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 10:39 am
The Australians refer to the Jehovah Witnesses as Godbotherers. This guy was kind of teh global warming equivalent. Please open your IPCC Report to the Book of Hansen, Verse 14.
2Cdo @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 11:01 am
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
The Australians refer to the Jehovah Witnesses as Godbotherers. This guy was kind of teh global warming equivalent. Please open your IPCC Report to the Book of Hansen, Verse 14.
Climate Fundamentalism is the new religion.
sandorski @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 6:31 pm
MeganC MeganC:
sandorski sandorski:
MeganC MeganC:
Were you? Because to me it looks like your idea of debate is to call other people stupid because they don't agree with your way of looking at science. I don't know much about science but I have five kids and I know a lot about when one of them isn't being nice to the others.
Don't try to turn this back on him. He came posting reasonable arguments and he got dismissed with Ad Homs and accusations of Trolling. He started with a legit position, got Trolled without one attempt at a counter position. That he responds in kind is just fitting in with the crowd.
If the Users of this forum just want to chase New Members off or existing Members of opposing viewpoints off it will dwindle to nothing.
I don't care if he has arguments or opinins but he comes here and opens up all these global warming topics and tries to shut down the debate instead of having a debate and that's what's wrong.
He was the only one who attempted debate or more accurately, he certainly made an attempt, but most of what he got in return was contempt for trying. If his eventual joining the opposition in nonsense is a mark against him, what of those who started with it?
2Cdo @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 6:44 pm
sandorski sandorski:
He was the only one who attempted debate or more accurately, he certainly made an attempt, but most of what he got in return was contempt for trying. If his eventual joining the opposition in nonsense is a mark against him, what of those who started with it?
Hypocrite fail.
sandorski @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 7:51 pm
2Cdo 2Cdo:
sandorski sandorski:
He was the only one who attempted debate or more accurately, he certainly made an attempt, but most of what he got in return was contempt for trying. If his eventual joining the opposition in nonsense is a mark against him, what of those who started with it?
Hypocrite fail.
kk