ABC Warmunists Claimed New York to be Underwater in 2015
Kootenays_kid @ Wed Jul 15, 2015 5:48 pm
For anyone who actually wants to know the science based facts on global warming, not the industry inspired myths.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It takes an effort to wade through the voluminous information, but it's well worth it if we want to implement policies that don't lead to catastrophe.
PluggyRug @ Wed Jul 15, 2015 6:47 pm
sandorski sandorski:
Public_Domain Public_Domain:
2Cdo 2Cdo:
Guy shows up in the summer, reveals he truly is a one-trick pony and doesn't post in any other thread except global warming/climate change threads. I still think he's a student who stumbled onto this site regurgitating the same shit that's been presented dozens of other times but HE/SHE thinks they're breaking new ground. 
Probably a first year student studying environmental sciences.
i'd like to believe that kids have better things to do than be shit-disturbers on small forums, but then again i've been here for almost ten years now, so you're probably right Probably a first year student studying environmental sciences.
So a new dude(assumed)shows up, makes good arguments supporting one side of an issue and y'all are just going to Ad Hom and call him a Troll?
It is what it is.
PluggyRug @ Wed Jul 15, 2015 6:52 pm
Kootenays_kid Kootenays_kid:
For anyone who actually wants to know the science based facts on global warming, not the industry inspired myths.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It takes an effort to wade through the voluminous information, but it's well worth it if we want to implement policies that don't lead to catastrophe.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It takes an effort to wade through the voluminous information, but it's well worth it if we want to implement policies that don't lead to catastrophe.
Skeptical science is not an accredited source of anything.
MeganC @ Wed Jul 15, 2015 7:52 pm
Kootenays_kid Kootenays_kid:
I was looking forward to some actual debate on this issue
Were you? Because to me it looks like your idea of debate is to call other people stupid because they don't agree with your way of looking at science. I don't know much about science but I have five kids and I know a lot about when one of them isn't being nice to the others.
MeganC @ Wed Jul 15, 2015 7:53 pm
Kootenays_kid Kootenays_kid:
For anyone who actually wants to know the science based facts on global warming, not the industry inspired myths.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It takes an effort to wade through the voluminous information, but it's well worth it if we want to implement policies that don't lead to catastrophe.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It takes an effort to wade through the voluminous information, but it's well worth it if we want to implement policies that don't lead to catastrophe.
Like I said you are not here for debate so don't pretend you are.
N_Fiddledog @ Wed Jul 15, 2015 8:03 pm
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Kootenays_kid Kootenays_kid:
For anyone who actually wants to know the science based facts on global warming, not the industry inspired myths.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It takes an effort to wade through the voluminous information, but it's well worth it if we want to implement policies that don't lead to catastrophe.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It takes an effort to wade through the voluminous information, but it's well worth it if we want to implement policies that don't lead to catastrophe.
Skeptical science is not an accredited source of anything.
I think of it more as John Cook and his little band of brain-trained bozos.
The Watts wannabe of alarmist zealots.
sandorski @ Wed Jul 15, 2015 8:35 pm
MeganC MeganC:
Kootenays_kid Kootenays_kid:
I was looking forward to some actual debate on this issue
Were you? Because to me it looks like your idea of debate is to call other people stupid because they don't agree with your way of looking at science. I don't know much about science but I have five kids and I know a lot about when one of them isn't being nice to the others.
Don't try to turn this back on him. He came posting reasonable arguments and he got dismissed with Ad Homs and accusations of Trolling. He started with a legit position, got Trolled without one attempt at a counter position. That he responds in kind is just fitting in with the crowd.
If the Users of this forum just want to chase New Members off or existing Members of opposing viewpoints off it will dwindle to nothing.
2Cdo @ Wed Jul 15, 2015 10:24 pm
sandorski sandorski:
MeganC MeganC:
Kootenays_kid Kootenays_kid:
I was looking forward to some actual debate on this issue
Were you? Because to me it looks like your idea of debate is to call other people stupid because they don't agree with your way of looking at science. I don't know much about science but I have five kids and I know a lot about when one of them isn't being nice to the others.
Don't try to turn this back on him. He came posting reasonable arguments and he got dismissed with Ad Homs and accusations of Trolling. He started with a legit position, got Trolled without one attempt at a counter position. That he responds in kind is just fitting in with the crowd.
If the Users of this forum just want to chase New Members off or existing Members of opposing viewpoints off it will dwindle to nothing.
He was a one-trick pony who offered up nothing new, just regurgitated talking points that have been posted here several times over.
But if he had have been bringing up anti-global warming posts guys like you would have been doing the same thing to him. Pretending you wouldn't is hypocritical.
PublicAnimalNo9 @ Wed Jul 15, 2015 10:42 pm
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Sea level is rising though, which was predicted. I suspect it will continue to rise.
Sea levels have been rising on average of about a foot or so a century over the last several hundred years. Predicting that sea levels will rise is like predicting the sun will rise.
sandorski @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:03 am
2Cdo 2Cdo:
sandorski sandorski:
MeganC MeganC:
Were you? Because to me it looks like your idea of debate is to call other people stupid because they don't agree with your way of looking at science. I don't know much about science but I have five kids and I know a lot about when one of them isn't being nice to the others.
Don't try to turn this back on him. He came posting reasonable arguments and he got dismissed with Ad Homs and accusations of Trolling. He started with a legit position, got Trolled without one attempt at a counter position. That he responds in kind is just fitting in with the crowd.
If the Users of this forum just want to chase New Members off or existing Members of opposing viewpoints off it will dwindle to nothing.
He was a one-trick pony who offered up nothing new, just regurgitated talking points that have been posted here several times over.
But if he had have been bringing up anti-global warming posts guys like you would have been doing the same thing to him. Pretending you wouldn't is hypocritical.
and?
The forum has plenty of the same. If no one wants to respond to his arguments, then they should just carry on rather than just greet him with trollish nonsense.
DrCaleb @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 6:16 am
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Kootenays_kid Kootenays_kid:
For anyone who actually wants to know the science based facts on global warming, not the industry inspired myths.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It takes an effort to wade through the voluminous information, but it's well worth it if we want to implement policies that don't lead to catastrophe.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It takes an effort to wade through the voluminous information, but it's well worth it if we want to implement policies that don't lead to catastrophe.
Skeptical science is not an accredited source of anything.
It is a good repository however, of good peer reviewed sources and published articles on the subject.
Zipperfish @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 8:41 am
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Sea level is rising though, which was predicted. I suspect it will continue to rise.
Sea levels have been rising on average of about a foot or so a century over the last several hundred years. Predicting that sea levels will rise is like predicting the sun will rise.
It's dh/dt that is the important statistic. Same with dT/dt.
2Cdo @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:00 am
sandorski sandorski:
and?
The forum has plenty of the same. If no one wants to respond to his arguments, then they should just carry on rather than just greet him with trollish nonsense.
Good to see you didn't deny being a hypocrite.
MeganC @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:18 am
sandorski sandorski:
MeganC MeganC:
Kootenays_kid Kootenays_kid:
I was looking forward to some actual debate on this issue
Were you? Because to me it looks like your idea of debate is to call other people stupid because they don't agree with your way of looking at science. I don't know much about science but I have five kids and I know a lot about when one of them isn't being nice to the others.
Don't try to turn this back on him. He came posting reasonable arguments and he got dismissed with Ad Homs and accusations of Trolling. He started with a legit position, got Trolled without one attempt at a counter position. That he responds in kind is just fitting in with the crowd.
If the Users of this forum just want to chase New Members off or existing Members of opposing viewpoints off it will dwindle to nothing.
I don't care if he has arguments or opinins but he comes here and opens up all these global warming topics and tries to shut down the debate instead of having a debate and that's what's wrong.
MeganC @ Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:19 am
Public_Domain Public_Domain:
every user you're talking to has been here for almost a decade, or more.
I've been on here 4 years and I still feel new!