Caucasian Privilege
Mustang1 @ Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:00 am
Omega Omega:
I didn't chastise you.
Yes, you did. Accept it and move on.
$1:
“I simply pointed out that your writing wasn't perfect either, the hyporite you are”
And yet, you couldn’t maintain the lofty expectations in your own prose (you couldn’t even do it in this very post!). You’re a disingenuous dunce and it’s “hypocrite” not “hyporite,” Mr. English.
Fucktard.
$1:
“The difference between me and you is you actually looked down on me for it.”
I look down on you because you’re a reactionary, sanctimonious hypocrite.
$1:
“I simply couldn't care.”
And yet you respond, which suggests the opposite.
$1:
“You seem to be quite upset over having me pointing out your posting flaws.”
Save the dime store psychology, as you seem to have confused a spirited defense with a genuinely bruised ego. Believe me, a gutterpig like you barely shows up on my radar. You’re here to entertain me. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Omega @ Wed Nov 07, 2007 8:50 pm
Mustang1 Mustang1:
Swift, moron, really swift - if I was referring to you, than that doesn't meant I was TALKING to you, you social douchebag. I was ALLUDING to you, you illiterate chimp, but that's not a direct engagement.
So I say you were talking to Brenda about me. You say no, you were talking to Brenda about me. Are you really this slow?
Mustang1 Mustang1:
Damn, get your special ed. teacher to help you, mushhead, as this is becoming sad. You must be into intellectual masochism, because you seem to love getting beat by me.
Beat me? LOL! You have yet to prove me wrong on anything except for one spelling error which wasn't actually you anyway.
Mustang1 Mustang1:
Troll off, McFuctard, Troll off
Didn't you already say something like this? Try something new. You're getting boring.
Omega @ Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:40 pm
Mustang1 Mustang1:
Yes, you did. Accept it and move on.
If pointing out that you fail to practise what you preach, then fine. I would suggest you be the one to accept it and move on. Maybe stroke that little penis of yours and get yourself in a better less-frustrated mood for the next time someone open-minded *gasp* disagrees with your one-sided simplistic politics regarding native affairs.
$1:
And yet, you couldn’t maintain the lofty expectations in your own prose (you couldn’t even do it in this very post!). You’re a disingenuous dunce and it’s “hypocrite” not “hyporite,” Mr. English.
Fucktard.
Fucktard.
I don't claim to have perfect English 100% of the time. In fact, I have already stated otherwise, and you would have noticed that if you didn’t have the temperament and cognitive abilities of a rabid dog in heat. That's what sets you apart as being the self-righteous hypocrite and bleeding rectum that is so pathetically you. You’re like a stupid fat guy who calls another fat guy “fat” yet gets upset when he's told "hey, look who's talking, you're fat too!" Then amazingly claims he’s the hypocrite when simple logic dictates it’s actually the other way around.
$1:
I look down on you because you’re a reactionary, sanctimonious hypocrite.
You haven't proven me of being a hypocrite once. Pointing out that someone isn't anyone to talk does not a hypocrite make. But never mind. You're much too obtuse to understand that. Derrrrr…
$1:
And yet you respond, which suggests the opposite.
As I’ve said, I simply couldn't care about your spelling and grammar. And to repeat myself once again, you ill-bred monkey, it's the hypocrisy I take exception to. How many times do I have to explain that before your little brain picks that up?
$1:
Save the dime store psychology, as you seem to have confused a spirited defense with a genuinely bruised ego. Believe me, a gutterpig like you barely shows up on my radar. You’re here to entertain me. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Riiigghhttt. "And yet you respond, which suggests the opposite." Does that written feces sound familiar to you?
Mustang1 @ Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:47 am
Omega Omega:
So I say you were talking to Brenda about me. You say no, you were talking to Brenda about me. Are you really this slow?
So, i wasn't talking to you, then was i, dummy? Again, social retard, alluding to you isn't directly speaking to you. Get a brain, chimp.
$1:
Beat me? LOL! You have yet to prove me wrong on anything except for one spelling error which wasn't actually you anyway.
LOL isn't a word, hypocrite. I thought we went over this before when you were on your grammar kick. Oh...and have you demonstrated that Brenda doesn't know anything about history yet? Didn't think so, asshat.
$1:
Didn't you already say something like this? Try something new. You're getting boring.
This is coming from the dipwad that retreats to banality like "LOL"?!?!? Piss off, loser.
Mustang1 @ Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Omega Omega:
If pointing out that you fail to practise what you preach, then fine. I would suggest you be the one to accept it and move on. Maybe stroke that little penis of yours and get yourself in a better less-frustrated mood for the next time someone open-minded *gasp* disagrees with your one-sided simplistic politics regarding native affairs.
Wait a flipping second! Are you suggesting that I masturbate? Are you picturing it? What kind of pervert are you? It’s not that kind of forum, John Mark Karr! Keep your psychosexual deviations to yourself and quit making suggestive remarks to me. Damn, the freaks are out today.
$1:
“I don't claim to have perfect English 100% of the time. In fact, I have already stated otherwise, and you would have noticed that if you didn’t have the temperament and cognitive abilities of a rabid dog in heat. That's what sets you apart as being the self-righteous hypocrite and bleeding rectum that is so pathetically you. You’re like a stupid fat guy who calls another fat guy “fat” yet gets upset when he's told "hey, look who's talking, you're fat too!" Then amazingly claims he’s the hypocrite when simple logic dictates it’s actually the other way around.”
<Sigh> You poor illiterate, stunted pervert. You chastised me on English and you make spelling errors yourself. Practice what you preach. Like you, it’s that simple.
$1:
“You haven't proven me of being a hypocrite once. Pointing out that someone isn't anyone to talk does not a hypocrite make. But never mind. You're much too obtuse to understand that. Derrrrr…
“
See above response, John Mark Karr.
$1:
As I’ve said, I simply couldn't care about your spelling and grammar. And to repeat myself once again, you ill-bred monkey, it's the hypocrisy I take exception to. How many times do I have to explain that before your little brain picks that up?
The facts speak for themselves, hypocrite. You chastised others for acts you can’t abstain from yourself. I can’t help that you’re an uneducated dullard any more than I can take responsibility for your psychosexual deviancies. You’re a disingenuous perv and that’s ultimately your problem, not mine.
$1:
“Riiigghhttt. "And yet you respond, which suggests the opposite." Does that written feces sound familiar to you?”
“Written feces”?!? That’s it?!? This is the “A” game from the peon intellect? I write in poop? Is it poop on your monitor, genius? Maybe that’s your hang up, not mine. Evidently, you’re a fecalphiliac in addition to fantasizing about other’s touching themselves. And now, our little forum monkey is flinging poop and blaming it on others. Pitiful. I’ve got some news for you, little chimp. You’re a pervert, you flung the poop, you’re a deviant and you’re a hypocrite.
Don’t like it? I don’t care. There’s a corner missing a suck – find it.
Numure @ Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:57 am
Ze anglish man treats me francais bad! Vive le Québec Libre! 
Wally_Sconce @ Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:26 am
Numure Numure:
Ze anglish man treats me francais bad! Vive le Québec Libre!
quebec liberals? i dont think there are many these days.