Previous  1 ... 7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Translation: Your party hasn't done squat for Natives and your rationalization is that they're an electoral failure.

   

I took a few examples you listed. That doesn't mean I'm not including anybody. Don't you understand the concept of an example? If we're going to knit-pick, you failed to included gays and atheists as well, for example. You might have the Mustang name but you aren’t very quick.


I realize they did, but for natives it was much more widespread, for a much longer duration of time, and up until more recently.


God no. Only some of them have, assuming money and resources can make up for physical, mental, and sexual abuse, that is.


If you actually took the time to read and could actually comprehend what I've said, I have merely stated that natives have had it worse, and I’m not talking just cultural assimilation (or cultural genocide more like it) but many other types of mistreatment as well. Not that those other groups haven't been mistreated. What part don't you understand? And since we're on the topic of “disclusion,” why do you only mention women, Jews, Irish, Dukabors, Japanese, and Chinese? You use examples correctly but criticize me when I do the same, you hypocrite.


Derrrrrr...

I'm recognizing the claims of others. Again, all I'm saying is that historically, natives have had it worse when added up after all these years. That doesn't mean I disregard what others have faced. You are so easy to debate. You are strawman all the way.

   

So?

I'm a man of principle.

   

Principal? You have something going with a local principal?



Read some freaking history before you type this tripe.

   

Really, which minority has had it the worst in Canada all these centuries?

(Spelling error fixed.)

   

Your comment doesn't specify Canada and your past arguements would lead one to believe that you feel Amerinds have the market cornered on human suffering. What they went through pales in comparison to the experiences of several ethnic groups. On top of this, what is being offered as compensation is like nothing any other group has received. Were we the cruel hearless overlords that some white apologists would have us believe, natives would be a footnote in a history text, rather than headlines in criminal activities like Caledonia.

   

You excluded the ones that didn’t fit into your “argument” – plain and simple.



Really? You don’t see a difference between what occurred under previous Imperial governments in the 1700s and the 1940s? BIG difference.



God yes. I’ll assume you’re referring to Residential schools in that hyperbolic mush and not only have they received an official apology, but they’ve been promised psychological counseling, monetary compensation and legal repercussions. Besides, haven’t Europeans settlers been victims of Native attacks? Haven’t OTHER native groups been culpable in eradicating their fellow natives? Where are their apologies or compensation?



Oh…it doesn’t take long to fly through your mush, but since you brought it up, all I’ve merely done is illustrate your agenda-pushing garbage. It’s exclusionary and dismissive. It seeks to paint Natives as the primary victims of past transgressions and it’s simply ahistorical. Bitch and whine till you’re blue in the face, but you’re peddling dreck.



Those are merely the few I threw out as examples – want more?



Actually, natives are only one group that has been mistreated historically. And women have had it worse, but I notice you keep cowering from that point, my dismissive chump.

And perhaps before chastising me for argumentative fallacies, you should abstain from using them yourself. This smells of hypocrisy and you reek of it.

   

Actually, you're a goof peddling ignorance.

   

[font=Comic Sans MS] Mustang you getting as bad as Sheperdsdog and that's gettn low! Or shall I compare your knowledge of aboriginal people along with the right-wing nutters? Those idiots base their knowledge on toilet wall grafitti and pulled their law degrees from a crackjack box. In other words they know "diddly-squat" when it comes to aboriginal issues.

Harper will nvr achieve a majority because all the sensible Canadians know who his advisor is, and in reality the rightwingers are worse than a bunch of kids. At least you make one valid statement with "just as bad if not worse." Now that you are starting to see through the fog spread your newfoundland oops I mean knowledge to all the other idiot, shepereddog right wing nutter types [/font]

   

He changed that just before i was gonna' comment - what a complete tool. Nice catch though.

   

Tell ya' what, turdbucket, i'll spot you two posts to demonstrate exactly where i've erred on objective information. You made the claim, so let's see you back it up

   

Sure you were going to, tool.

"I" is capitalized. A hyphen doesn’t separate two sentences. "Gonna" isn't an actual word.

   

So if the majority of Canadians wanted to rape you then send you on a boat back to Holland, that would be OK with you?

   

Childish...

Misuse of a word or slang. BIG difference.

   

Don't you just love Grey Bowel Movement's wonderful command of the English language? But then, he likely learned it at the knee of his mother......you know, the one one who arrived from Europe reeking of shit and piss.

   

Previous  1 ... 7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next