Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Rubbish.

Derby defends the Liberals, alright, but doesn't spam the forum with thread after thread of mindless partisan hate, unlike the usual resident con suspects.

   

   

Friedbrain alone has probably started more idiotically partisan threads than all the Liberal regulars combined.

   

Derby has never, to my knowledge, ever condemned the party for it's antics. It has always been, just a few bad apples, instead of addressing the rot within. But I didn't expect you to buy into it, you're just as bad. He said Conservatives were partisan hacks and I showed that the Liberal supporters tend to be far more partisan, but you missed that little tidbit of info, being just another Liberal mouthpiece.

   

Your complete lack of objectivity and fairness is painfully obvious to see, given that you're not one to cast a critical eye on the cons, but instead prefer to bitch and whine about the Liberals. Case in point: The silly drivel you just wrote above.

You do a remarkably good job of providing evidence to support Derbs' point.

Hypocrite.

   

What demise? Were back, were in power and it's likely to stay that way until the blood letting in the Liberal party stops and the corrupt old guard is removed.

.

Well, why don't you guys all get together, have a big group grope, then form one great socialist party. Oh wait. That wouldn't work would it. There'd be even more bloodletting, and back stabbing than there already is. Especially when you throw in Taliban Jack as a candidate for Beloved Leader.

I must admit though, it would be interesting to see who'd win this Liberal Party cat fight, especially if the corrupt old guard Liberals didn't hold sway over all three parties. My money'd be on TJ, who despite his diminished political acumen has more charisma and leadership potential than the nerd. Who knows, since TJ claims to represent the "working class"(see buzz hargrove) he'd might just win.

   

So.....

And, most are not so "idiotic"

Derby is as partisan as any Conservative here, nothing wrong in that, just don't accuse others of the same.

   

Maybe not all of them are idiotic, but most of them show a lot of bad faith.

Derby, on the other hand, has rarely started a Conservative-bashing thread, but merely chooses to defend the Liberals from all the mindless attacks. Big difference.

   

Actually I have disagreed with the Conservative party several times, including the 93 election, but you obviously didn't know that. Why is posting information on Liberals being even more partisan than Conservatives "silly drivel'? Is it because it makes you look as bad as you accuse Conservatives to be? Or is it part of my "secret agenda" that Liberals always accuse Conservatives of having?

Keep drinking the Kool Aid.

   

I'd say any attacks on the Liberal party in the last few years have been brought on by themselves!

   

Of course you didn't like the PCs in '93! You were probably a Reformer - which, incidentally, is the core predecessor of the current CPC. Are you as critical about Harper and the CPC as you are about the Liberals or any other party?

Not here, though apparently you got a laugh out of it...

Or here (just a lame excuse about how the Liberals did it, so it's no big deal if the Cons do too, even though it was very offensive to you when it was the Libs)...

Where was your righteous indignation? At the very least you could have rolled your eyes.

If these had been stories about the Liberals you would have been frothing at the mouth.



Where have you ever posted any "information"? All we get are your biases, and that's characteristic of many of the Cons on this board.



That's it?!? Pathetic.

   

The trouble that just isn't what happened. I posted the election numbers a year ago showing the same basic # of total votes for conservative parties remained constant. The fact they were split into different parties is what propelled the Liberals.

Now look at the number of morons on this forum using insult words for the Liberals yet how many of us bother with conservidiots, con jobs, constupiditives? Only Dayseed bothered and that was nothing less then an illustration point.

Virtually none of them make any attempt whatsoever to even bother with discussing politics as its nothing but ad hominem attacks and whenever anyone posts any topic that attacks the cons its always "typical bitching liberal" even when its an NDP voter posting it.

You my friend are simply letting your own blind partisanship blind you to the fact that its always the cons starting 99% of the political attack ads and mistaking any defence of ones political party as blind partisanship.

Hell, you guys blame the Liberals for everything as recent threads showed that perfectly. We don't blame conservatives for our own failings.

   

Really? The fact that long ago I made every effort to engage the cons in meaningful political discussion but met only blind hatred probably escapes you.

The fact that I have repeatedly condemned both kyoto and the gun registry escapes you.

The simple fact that as Streaker points out (and you disingenously call him a Liberal mouthpiece) I spend my time defending the Liberal triumphs rather then wasting all my energy launching bitch thread after bitch thread after bitch thread probably escapes you eh?

I notice you never ever ever call out any of the anti-Liberal whiners or bother attacking the plethora of people whos entire political commentary can be distilled down to "&*%$#@ Libranos".

   

As partisan? No. I don't start 6 anti-conservative threads daily and when I do start a thread detailing a factual book by your own goys your response as was the other responses illustrated just who displays blindness and punditry.

   

The only people who keep using the term "secret agenda" is you guys and the fact that Harpers former campaign manager, Tom Flanagan, seems to write that very thing in his new book seems to say that its your own guys saying it also.

   

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next