Canada Kicks Ass
New Gov Gen a.....separatist?

REPLY

1  2  3  4  5 ... 13  Next



Tman1 @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:51 pm

http://news.yahoo.com/s/cpress/20050811 ... ignty_jean

$1:
MONTREAL (CP) - An outspoken Quebec sovereigntist wants Gov. Gen.-designate Michaelle Jean to say how she voted in the 1995 referendum.

The call comes after an article in a sovereigntist publication that says she and her husband supported Quebec independence and that Jean's spouse, filmmaker Jean-Daniel Lafond, was friendly with former Quebec terrorists.

"In the nationalist circles, many people were sure that Mme. Jean and her husband were sovereigntists, many persons believed that," said Gilles Rheaume, president of the Quebec-based organization against Canadian corruption and propaganda and a former president of the Societe St-Jean Baptiste.

Rheaume said Thursday that
Prime Minister Paul Martin should have checked Jean's credentials more carefully and called him "an amateur to name a person who many believe is a sovereigntist, to name this person head of state."

He has written to Jean asking how she voted in Quebec's 1995 sovereignty referendum, which federalists won by a razor-thin majority.

"We believe the people of Canada and the people of Quebec have the right to know," Rheaume said, although he acknowledged he isn't holding his breath for a reply.

But Transport Minister Jean Lapierre, who co-founded the sovereigntist Bloc Quebecois before returning to the Liberals under Martin, said Jean was nominated for her strong qualities.

"Madame Jean is not a sovereigntist," Lapierre said at a news conference in Laval, north of Montreal.

"If there are old friends who want to trip her up, unfortunately, I hope that she won't consider them any longer as friends," he said.

"Now the political convictions of her husband will be for her to answer to."

A spokesman for Jean referred calls to Martin's office.

Martin spokesman Scott Reid said Jean, a well-known broadcaster in Quebec, and Lafond are committed Canadians who are the victims of a smear campaign.

"To suggest that Mr. Lafond's documentary on the FLQ crisis makes him a separatist sympathizer is to suggest that Ken Burns' documentary on the Civil War makes him a Confederate secessionist," Reid said. "It's absurd.

"What is taking place here is nothing more complicated than a smear campaign by hardline separatists who see Mme. Jean's appointment as a threat.

"She has struck a chord across Canada and in Quebec, particularly. And it is sad and ugly and terribly dispiriting that this kind of thing takes place."

The controversy arose after the release of an article in Le Quebecois, the voice of the province's sovereignty watchdogs, said sovereigntists were disappointed by Jean's appointment as Adrienne Clarkson's replacement in September because Jean and Lafond were considered sympathetic to the cause.

It also noted the couple had renovations done to their home library by Jacques Rose, a former member of the Front de liberation du Quebec, who is now a contractor.

Rose served eight years as an accessory after the fact in the kidnap and murder of provincial cabinet minister Pierre Laporte in the 1970 October Crisis.

Lafond, who was born in France, met a number of former FLQ members when he worked on the 1994 National Film Board documentary, La Liberte en colere.

He co-wrote the film with Francis Simard, another FLQ member who was given early parole in 1982 after being sentenced to life for his role in killing Laporte, who was strangled and found in the trunk of an abandoned taxi.

During a visit to Montreal, Conservative Leader Stephen Harper only said Martin may have some questions to answer about Jean's appointment.

Jean Dorion, the president of the Societe St-Jean Baptiste's Montreal branch, said few people know Jean's political leanings but "as far as Mr. Lafond is concerned, everything I hear about him is that he was a strong pro-independentiste."

Dorion said he believed Martin is trying to "seduce" parts of Quebec with a twist on the scandal-plagued sponsorship program then-prime minister Jean Chretien used to promote Canadian unity.

"It's a more sophisticated kind of sponsorship program," he said. "It's not as gross. In the sponsorship program you also had a few convinced independentistes getting money from the federal government and working for the independentiste movement.

"In this case, it's more subtle, more complicated but it's the same kind of process," he said. "You know, in Quebec a lot of people work on both sides. It's strange but that's the way it is."

He cited the case of Quebec sovereigntist entertainers who take advantage of federal funding programs.

Dorion said Lafond will likely deny any sovereigntist links but "there is always a doubt that will linger in people's minds."

Is our new Gov Gen a sovereigntist or just a scapegoat of separatist propaganda? Or does Paul Martin have some explaining to do?

   



Bouboumaster @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:57 pm

Qu'est-ce que sa fait qu'elle soit souvrainiste? Aux dernières nouvelles, on ne devrait même pas avoir de gouverneuse générale! Sa ne sert plus à rien. Elle n'a aucuns pouvoirs là ou elle est.

   



hwacker @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:00 pm

"Paul Martin have some explaining to do", does anybody really need to answer that ?


I hope she's a closet separatist that will look so nice this fall. I guess Martini should have played enie meenie minie moe with a different bunch of liberals working at the CBC.

   



ShepherdsDog @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:03 pm

If it's proven that she is a separatist (sovereigntist is a bullshit PC term) then Martin has to immediately appoint another GG designate. This would make her an enemy of the state rather than a proper choice for the head of state.

   



Proculation @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:38 pm

sovereignist isn't even a word.

It was invented by the media because it was less provocative than independantist and separatist.

See who controls the minds in here ? :roll:
They even succeeded to invent a word !

   



hwacker @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:41 pm

Proculation Proculation:
sovereignist isn't even a word.

It was invented by the media because it was less provocative than independantist and separatist.

See who controls the minds in here ? :roll:
They even succeeded to invent a word !


CBC ?

   



Tman1 @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:07 pm

Wow, sovereigntist isn't even a word... :roll: Now how about actually talking about the article. I'll change it to separatist if it makes Quebecers happy.

   



Proculation @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:09 pm

I was responding to ShepherdsDog post's, Tman1....

   



EyeBrock @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:13 pm

Shepherds Dog, the GG isn't the head of state mate, it's still Aunty Betty Windsor.

   



Tman1 @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:15 pm

Well who cares, a words a word. If this is true however I remain skeptical that it is, (probably more separatist BS) but if it is.....well might we rethink about the whole choosing of Gov Generals in general or the whole reason why Martin chose this specific person? More Quebec appeasement?

   



Proculation @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:20 pm

Be skeptical all you want, "souverainiste" is not a word, based on any french dictionary. It's pure invention by the media.
There I let you go with your thread.

   



ridenrain @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:20 pm

More Quebec appeasement?
For sure! The main function of the Liberal party is to get itself re-elected and pandering to Quebec might smooth over some of the damage that the Gomery (remember that scandel, CBC?).
Quebec is the one place they stand to loose the most, so it makes sense that's where the'll try the hardest.

   



Tman1 @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:22 pm

Proculation Proculation:
Be skeptical all you want, "souverainiste" is not a word, based on any french dictionary. It's pure invention by the media.
There I let you go with your thread.

Hmm think your misinterpreting things yet again Proc. I am not talking about the word, I am talking about the topic in general. Maybe I should have made it more clear, I remain skeptical that the article is true and that it is separatist propaganda.

   



Proculation @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:27 pm

Ok ok :oops:

My mistake :!:

   



Tman1 @ Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:29 pm

No prob bud but I am curious as to what you think. Can someone vote a yes at the 1995 referendum and later change their minds and be used against them? [B-o]

   



REPLY

1  2  3  4  5 ... 13  Next