Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6 ... 10  Next

hwacker reminds me of an old story. A ship went down and a lucky few got into a life boat. As they floated around waiting for rescue, one end of the boat sprang a leak. People at that end were frantically bailing out the water.

The guys at the other end of the boat thanked god. 'God, we thank you twice.

First, you saved us and gave us this boat.

Second, you put the leak at the other end. So we can relax and pray, while those poor bastards at that end have to work and bail out the water!'

   

Yes. If I don't start insulting, then I don't believe he will either.

   

I'd like to see the thread that Avro doesn't insult Hwacker without provocation. That's not to say Hwacker hasn't done some insulting previously, but you can count on Avro to keep it going.

   

We are leading just fine. We have to fix a few things before we can truely lead this country into further greatness.

I never said differently.

No. It was a wrong initiative. That's why it was changed, and rightly so.

Lady? That's a new one. And of course you missed the point. "Curing" them was not a waste. It was in our poor money management, and ludicrous wait times that caused a waste of money.
OOO, insulting me and my mom's choices. And who said you don't insult? Well actually, she put me in a day care for the morning like twice a week, mainly so I can meet people. Institionalizing kids does nothing but fuck them up.

Oh and some how I am not "quality?" Considering I could probably be accepted to any university in Canada, you're just plain wrong.

Deliberately? That's a foiler theory if I ever heard one. He did what he set out to do. Put it to a freee vote. Done, and over with. Spin it how you wish, but you just look like a fool.

As I said above, I would much rather have someone admit they made a mistake, and fix something accordingly, then to go on stubbornly and not doing anything about it.

Wrong. Soldiers are more important then these retarded feminist groups.
I am not a woman Dumbass.

Women's rights? Tell me, what right doesn't a woman have? Feminists are sexists in their own right. They will not say they are equal till they are somehow above men. I say we are pretty equal right now.

   

:roll: Maybe this is RuSerious?

I am not a girl you unobservant twit.

   

Ah but I am hoping if no one starts it, he will be smart enoug not to.

   

   

Tricks, first of all, I note that you are not a woman, I'm new around here and do not place people correctly. You just seemed to decent to be a conservative!

Secondly I think you have not read correctly what I wrote. Here is how it should read:

a. Working mothers know the value of child care.

b. Except, that is, mothers whose children need to be taken by children's aid.

c. Such children, as you say, get fucked up.

d. But you tricks, seem to be of better quality (than the fucked up crowd.)

e. And I think that is because your mother used child care and would have avoided Children's Aid.

But without reading correctly, you have confirmed what I wrote. Just as you could stay at home, AND your mother could work, thanks to child care, we think all Canadian kids should have their mother.

And that women should find it easier to have kids.

Liberals will bring child care right back, however much Harper dismantles it!

   

Thick headed people don't get it, we don't want it.

Furthermore Liberal daycare would be considered child abuse by some and could land the Gov't in court 24X7.


+ it's a settled matter. just like that other thing

   

Interesting. Using a post dripping with homophobia to decry the Conservatives for "homophobia". How utterly tolerant of you.

And your belief that the opponents of same-sex marriage will ever vote for the Liberals or the NDP, for that matter, is just plain delusional.

   

Working parents also know the value of choice, which the Conservative plan has provided, and the Liberal plan hasn't.



They would be much better-adjusted if they were taken by their parents, or at least by other members of their family -- which the Conservative plan allows for, and the Liberal plan doesn't.



The Liberals never really brought in childcare to begin with, and the proponents of child care have yet to answer the following question:

How does one expect the state to know what is good for children better than their parents?

   

No, she didn't use childcare. She used it everyonce in a while, but normally said forget it.

   

Don't know how well you can read, my dear member of the legion of unread and unwashed, but I have no post dripping with homophobia. I am a Liberal, and we tolerate homophobia and every other sexual persuasion, provided as Trudeu said, it involved consenting adults and is done in private.

Because of the unwashed and unread legion you belong to, let me clarify, and excuse me if you are slightly better read, as Tricks is, for instance:

Adults means people of legal age for the activity.

Consenting excludes rape, date rape drugs, tricks and such.

Private is a clause added but it is flexible. For instance, kissing and embracing between lovers was once strictly private, now it is tolerated. Gay parades are not sexual acts so they can flourish.


I think that opponents of same-sex marriage will vote only for those who can bring that law into force. Harper has just shot his chances of uniting the extreme right and muslim and jewish fundamentalists. No way they line up behind Harper again!

   

You cant dismantle something that was never there in the first place.

People want to have kids fine, dont ask me to babysit everyones kids with my tax dollars . We should be promoting responsible parenting and not this nanny state where everyone and anyone except the parents who brought them into the world to care of them.

Why do we have a system now that punishes people who decide to not leech off the system where one of the parents actually stays home and raises their own kids, you wouldn't believe the benifits this has for the kid in question, a parent taking care of them rather than a stranger dropped off at daycare while people drive off in their bmw to pursue their corporate careers, suggest anything else and were trying to keep the women down, right . You do know that some men stay home and play this role simply because the women makes more money. Oh the injustices of this Conservative government towards women.

Theres a benifit for kids that are brought up and taken care by their maternal parents as opposed to a stranger at daycare. Some parents need daycare but what you want is a nanny state, horse shit.

   

Really, and your insinuation that Harper has sodomized the religious vote was precisely what? Seems pretty homophobic to me.

And just think: you, one of the "oh-so-tolerant, oh-so-"intelligent"" Liberal party "intelligensia" resorting to such tactics. Who are you more tolerant than today, I wonder?



It's pretty obvious that you tolerate homophobia. Your original post is proof of that.

Do you tolerate homosexuality? Obviously, not as much as you would like us to believe you do. Oh, for shame.



So then why all the homophobia, if you want us to believe you're so tolerant?



Shows what you know -- nothing. Opponents of same-sex marriage will never vote for the Liberals because they're the ones who helped force it into law in the first place.

Now, as for the "legion of the unread" comment, I have a little challenge for you. Let's compare how well-read we are. This week alone, I've read:

Think Big by Preston Manning
Civil Society, Globalization and Three Folding by Nicolas Perlas
Terror and Counter-Terror: A Criminological Perspective, by Mathieu Deflem.

Yourself?

   

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6 ... 10  Next