1  2  3  4  5  Next

And how in the name of anything that is sacred did the USA, the country that was ruthlessly attacked by muslims on 911 and that was founded on the principles of the Christian Bible, ever come to electing this proud, pompous asshole, as potus??????

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

Please someone, tell me..

   

I think we already saw this one.

   

I thought maybe I saw a precursor to this collections of psycopathic rants on cka, this one seemed even more blatant.

   

My thinking is that mr zero is not "the" Anti Christ, but he sure as heck is a contender.

   

What is this Muslim shit? Obama is not really a Muslim, and even if he were, who cares?

And what business does a Canadian have getting all worked up about this?

And FYI, the US was not founded on the principles of the Christian Bible any more than Canada was (and in fact, even less).

   

I do agree that Obama has the potential to be one of the most dangerous people in the world right now. He and his radical Czars are ideological and driven to push an agenda on what they see as an America too dumb to know what's good for them. That sort of disrespect to the people never enda well.

   

Micky Mouse could be president of the united states and he would have the potential to be one of the most dangerous people in the world right now. They're less radical than the last group of 'czars' that much is plain.

The moment a democrat (the fact that it's Obama means very little) was elected the Republicans suddenly turned into the Republi-can'ts. It was 'raw-raw Afghanistan' until he stated he wanted to concentrate on it. It;s become amusing to see republicans turn into picculi-smoking peaceniks who all of a sudden decided that "Afghanistan can't be won".

This is all bullshit. The Republicans are pouting and they just want to see him lose at anything he could possibly lose at.

   

Where do you get that idea? Please elaborate.

I don't recall any Republicans citing chairman Mao as their inspiration. It looks like Anita Dunn is now also stepping down because of that. There could never be a Republican version of Van Jones in government because the media would have exploded that far out of proportion.

   

What's to elaborate sir? This is not the only forum I post on. Canadian papers aren't the only ones I read. It's pretty simple: Before the election Afghanistan was the 'good fight' to Republicans. The moment Obama stated he was going to make Afghanistan a priority (still before the election actually) they all decided it was a lost cause; go ahead - let Osama go, let the Taliban return.
I recall a few stating "God was their inspiration" and that's easily as stupid.

Yep yep yep. It's like the last 8 years just went 'poof' and disappeared into nothingness.



Face it: Obama could cure cancer and the Republicans would call it the work of a socialist tyrant.

   

I'm interested where you got the opinion on Afghanistan because I'm just not seeing any change from the Republican side.

So you are equating god to Mao?

So far that's 2 Czars who have been identified as radical Marxists and have been removed. It's clear that the people don't like that sort of talk.

   

Riden: "I don't recall any Republicans citing chairman Mao as their inspiration."

Akhenaten: "I recall a few stating "God was their inspiration" and that's easily as stupid."

Riden: "So you are equating god to Mao?"






lol. Hilarious. Head and shoulders more than any other forum I've ever been on people on this forum simply refuse to argue what you say and instead must make up what you say and then try and argue it. Very embarrassing since this is a Canadian forum and we're supposed to be 'smart'.

Rumsfeld (another 'czar') was screwing up left, right and centre and he wasn't removed for 4 years....long after the damage he did waws irreversible.

   

The folks who cited God are still around.
The ones who publicly cited Mao are not.

Surely, you're smart enough to figure it out.

I think even Obama cites God on occasion, depending on the audience.

   

"Surely, your smart enough to figure it out."


What? that I'm equating Mao to God? No. There is nothing anywhere i've said that remotely suggests that's what I'm saying. Now you seem to be backing away from that. Are you?

Don't pull the childish games you just pulled and then yak about 'smart' Riden. Quit playing games.

   

Your the one saying that referencing God is just as stupid as referencing Mao even though it's clear that even Obama references God, yet those Czars who referenced Mao are gone.
Your the one that needs to clear things up.

I'm still waiting for you to show where the Reps have stopped supporting the Afghan war that the Dems still support. Recently Jodie Evans and Code Pink, huge $ supporters of Obama recently handed over a petition asking Obama to withdraw the troops from Afghanistan. I've seen no such movement from the Republican side.

Please tell me where you get this idea.

http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/23/a-n ... onnection/

   

No. It's clear as day. You're trying to make things obscure by re-arrainging what I said.
You state that someone cites Mao as their inspiration you are insinuating that the problem with that is the person will get their 'directions' from what mao has said or done - to do 'what Mao would do' so to speak. Politicians who state that they get their inpiration from God are making the same insinuation and that's just as silly. Obama "referencing" God is not the same thing as saying you get your inspiration from him and believe that you're doing Gods work.


You're referring to republican politicians and I'm referring to Republican commentators and plain supporters.


The anti-Obama rants going on in the States are beyond hysterical, straight into lunacy. Really no sense trying to talk you or anyone else out of them.

   

1  2  3  4  5  Next