Family of slain Toronto teen remembers their 'bright light'

God! I'd realy liketoacceptwhat you are saying as truth of the matter and yet
I can not.
The following word drewmy attentionmore than the rest,
""...the root causes of anti-social behavior are the break-down and disintegration of the family unit, leiniant judiciary, ghettoization and the lack of condemation by society as a whole of the often backward culture that develops there..."

I would like to see further explanations and discussion come out of those words to met they beg discussion.

' disintagration of the family' ?

will there not be multiple casues for such disintagrations?

' Leniant judiciary'?
Generally? or specificly lenient, again supportting evidence isrequired
in general our collective views are shaped by ur peticular assesments and lead to inexacteties (is that a word?)due to many factors.
linguists willtellus our reality maps arerarelyif ever, identicle

Becausei am an info junkie i collect obe=servations reports and the like and a decent numberof thes obsevation have no appeal or percieved value unless there is somefiddle that canbe attached
yes the various levels of government have goobled up beauceau dollars and show meger or negative results and wereplanned to do so, or administration costs exceeded benifits to those in need,nottomention the players and grifter that got in on the action

On last nights news there was a round upotthe hustlers and cons that got in on the hrricane dollarsbeing rounded up

In short corruption fromthe topdownplays a large part

on a differentthread iposted the article /example from Finland on women and poverty
There are working models to draw from
Shoot the looters??
shot the administators is more like it.

---
Your mantra has been your opinions are stifled due to their contrary nature, when they are actually stifled for being without perceivable foundation

The problem lies within the community itself and each and every one of us.

When people in a society, city and community speak up, support each other, take ownership of their neighborhoods and make a stand against criminal activity, youth and domestic violence then the citizens of Toronto will see an end to this violence.

By supporting the perpetrators, bullies and deviants of these crimes by keeping quiet, not speaking out against them, not turning them in to Police for what ever reason and not standing up and supporting each other in our communities and those that do make a stand we condemn all of us to a life of misery and sub-servant existence under these perpetrators.

Silence and turning the other cheek saying it is not my problem or that it does not concern me or mine gives strength and justification to those that wish to harm us. For if we do not care do not make the mistake that these low life’s will. The strength to defeat these people lies within us all.

It is always harder to do the right thing in life then it is to do the wrong thing.

Make a stand!

---
Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.

I agree. When these issues come up, no one every talks about 'white collar crime'. So what is the cause of that? Too much money? Too much education? What about all you Bush bashers? You say the man is guilty of war crimes, of killing his own young people in Iraq for oil, of destroying the U.S. and all that bullshit. He's certainly not poor, so where are all the excuses for his so-called crimes? Damn hypocrites.

Ed Deak you are WAY off the mark. She died at the hand of Jamaican gang violence and because the idiots who pulled the trigger were too stupid or careless to hit the right persn.

HOWEVER, this has NOTHING to do with 30,000 children starving today. We can'r save them nor should we allow Caribbean refugees into Canada who are hostile to our society.

Marcarc, how can you say such silly utopuan things?!!

Poverty leads to stress but many of these drug-dealing gangmembers are actually making more money dealing drugs than they would working.

It is a disgrace that a young, beautiful, athletic, and smart blonde white girl is not getting defended even after her death while lame-ass liberals take about how "the gangsters" (who are almost always black in Toronto and Asian in Vancouver) were oppressed. They are not oppressed any more than a poor white kid in Scotland or Russia. They are simply stupid, impatient, insecure, self-centred and have no regard or ability to care for life around them. When one looks at the murder rates in the Caribbean or Africa this AWFUL murder is NO SURPIRSE.

NO SURRENDER to the MARXIST LIBERALS!!!

Don't be an idealist anon. We have to save Canada from the liberals and their third-world immigration policy.

The Liberals are also quite happy for the noble savages to come here as they vote Liberal every time.

Just me you are being awfully accurate though much more PC than you could be.

"canada, and specifically toronto, have now developed a demographic which the united states developed previously. people in the united states realized what (or rather who) the main troublemakers were and are, and were roundly denounced as insular, racist red-necks, where-as canadians were far more tolerant and enlightened LOL!"

--It is funny. Just remember the U.S.A. had a 12% African American minority and Canada had little of comparison. We still have fewer Africans and they are more integrated, but ghettoization is increasing although the distinct African American culture just goes to alienate American blacks from mainstream society even more, regardless of economic factors.

Feel free to look up raciallly-based crime statistics and learn a lot, anyone.

---
"A Liberal is someone who refuses to take his own side in a fight".

-Robert Frost

jensonj I hope you don't actually believe what you are saying. Blaming a frightened majority for immigrant gang violence is quite shameful. I guess lovely Jane Creba was part of the problem too, RIGHT??!!

---
"A Liberal is someone who refuses to take his own side in a fight".

-Robert Frost

It should be added that the murder rate in Kingston, Jamaica is 6500 murders a year, about 100 times (!!!) the murder rate of Toronto, Ontario. Why does it surprise people if immigrants from violent countries behave the same way when they immigrate to a different country?

True Canada is wealthier, and more stable culturally and very civil even compared to most European countries, BUT, that only goes so far.

---
"A Liberal is someone who refuses to take his own side in a fight".

-Robert Frost

Here is America's story: 
 
<a href="http://www.white-history.com/hwr66.htm">www.white-history.com/hwr66.htm</a> 
 
Chapter 66: Social Upheaval - 
 
'Civil Rights' and the Collapse of Communism 
 
Part One: Black Power: The Civil Rights Movement 
 
The forty five years following the end of the Second World War were dominated by three issues: the decolonization process; the development of the concept of Civil Rights, which saw the last of the formal segregation measures between Black and White, mainly in America, come tumbling down; and the hostility between the 'West" and the "East" - also known as the Cold War, or conflict between Communism and the West. 
 
In all of these developments, race was to play a critical factor: the decolonization process has already been dealt with; in the Cold War conflict the Soviets and the West fought each other through non-White surrogates in the Third World; and the Civil Rights movement in America produced some of the greatest racial clashes in America's history, essentially without solving the issues at hand. 
 
The Emergence of Racial National Politics in America 
 
Although it is often claimed that there are no racial patterns discernible in American politics, in fact there have been very clear racial divides since the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt : in the mid 1930s, the majority of Blacks voted for the Democratic Party for the first time, and have maintained that loyalty to the greater degree. 
 
Right to the end of the 20th century, the majority of Blacks have tended to vote for the Democratic Party, which along with the growing Mexican (called Hispanic) vote, has become the chosen party of non-White Americans, as opposed to the Republicans who have to increasingly rely more and more on shrinking numbers of White voters. 
 
The first time that the black bloc vote played a significant role in helping to elect an American president occurred as early as 1948, when Harry Truman was elected to the office through a combination of the bloc Black vote and a minority of White votes. Truman had gained the support of Blacks by issuing an executive order that eventually desegregated the armed forces and by supporting a pro-civil rights policy for the Democratic Party over strong opposition from Southerners. The next president, Dwight D. Eisenhower, completed the desegregation of the government and armed forces, but refused to take it any further than that. 
 
NAACP EVOLVES UNDER JEWISH LEADERSHIP 
 
Blacks, led by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP - despite its name, the NAACP was ironically led by Arthur Spingarn, a Jewish lawyer, who became the focus for much anti-Semitic propaganda from the American right wing) turned to the courts. 
 
One of the earliest NAACP legal victories was the 1944 outlawing of the all-White Democratic Party primary, an institution which had existed since the post reconstruction period in America. In May 1954, the NAACP won a ruling from the US Supreme Court, known as the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, in terms of which racial segregation was outlawed in all American public schools. 
 
This decision reversed the principle of "separate but equal" that had been the basis of black-white relations since the Plessy v. Ferguson decision of 1896. Subsequent decisions in 1955 and 1956, compelled local governments to publicly announce plans for desegregation and also ended racial segregation in intrastate transportation. 
 
FORCED Integration at Gunpoint 
 
Whites in the Southern states bitterly opposed the moves to desegregate schools. In September 1957, the governor of Arkansas, Orval E. Faubus, ordered the state's National Guard to prevent nine Black students from attending Central High School in Little Rock. 
 
On 23 September, following a number of racial clashes between Blacks and Whites in the town, Eisenhower dispatched federal troops to force White students to attend the school, frog-marching the protesting Whites at gunpoint with bayonets drawn, into the classrooms. 
 
Public Transport DESEGREGATED 
 
By December 1955, a series of public protests led by the Black Christian minister Martin Luther King, had succeeded in forcing the desegregation of public transport in the South, most notably in Montgomery, Alabama, where a sit-in in a bus terminal created such chaos that the state government was forced to back down on its segregationist policies. 
 
The Northern States and Bussing 
 
Although the northern states of America did not have as extensive a network of segregationist laws as the southern states, the reality was that the races lived in separate neighborhoods for the greatest part and thus also had segregated schools and facilities. 
 
Where intentional segregation existed in the north, as in the city of Boston, the federal courts ordered redrawing of neighborhood school district lines, starting the practice of "bussing" - where children of different races were transported, sometimes 80 kilometers - 50 miles or more - across huge distances to force them to attend schools attended predominantly by other races. This bussing system caused a great many racial clashes and violence. 
 
Very little point was achieved by sending 100 White children into a school of 2000 Black children, or vice versa, apart from increasing racial tensions dramatically. The practice of bussing then spread all over America, soon becoming a major national political issue which was debated right up to presidential level. 
 
Kennedy and Civil Rights 
 
The 1960 election of John F. Kennedy as Democratic Party president of America - again with overwhelming Black voter support - saw a new surge in laws designed to strike down the last of the segregationist measures in America. 
 
Miscegenation Laws Repealed 
 
The long established American laws forbidding intermarriage between Whites and Blacks were also then challenged in courts and repealed: between 1942 and 1967, 14 states repealed their anti-miscegenation laws. In the case known as Loving v. Virginia (1967), the US Supreme Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage and by 1968, all forms of de jure segregation had been declared unconstitutional. 
 
University Race Riots 
 
A major racial incident occurred in 1962, when a Black student attempted to register at the University of Mississippi: a protest by White students was met with a counter demonstration by Blacks and soon a full-scale race riot erupted, in which two people were killed and 375 wounded. The Mississippi National Guard had to be called in to patrol the university campus. President Kennedy also sent federal troops onto the campus of the university of Alabama to enforce integration at gunpoint there as well. 
 
Kennedy was on the point of preparing a comprehensive law to enforce Black rights when he was assassinated in Dallas, Texas in 1963. His successor, vice president Lyndon B. Johnson, immediately announced that he would proceed with all due haste to enact the legislation that Kennedy had started: the result was a July 1963 law, which prohibited discrimination in the use of federal funds and in public accommodations; at the same time an "Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" was set up to ensure that Whites employed equal numbers of Blacks in any businesses they had - the start of the racial quota system which in effect meant anti-White discrimination, forcing businesses to employ non-Whites even if better qualified White candidates were available. 
 
Voting Rights Act of 1965 
 
In addition to this, the US Constitution was amended in January 1964, to prevent any local authority from using poll tax registration as a means of preventing any person from registering as a voter. Finally in 1965, a comprehensive Civil Rights Act, more correctly called the Voting Rights Act, was signed into law by Johnson: this gave legislative enforcement to the constitutional amendment. 
 
The law also suspended (and amendments later banned) the use of literacy tests for voters. The final abolition of the last literacy tests allowed high numbers of illiterate Black to gain access to the vote: in Mississippi, for example, the percentage of Blacks registered to vote increased from 7 percent in 1964 to 59 percent in 1968. 
 
Black Riots ERUPT DESPITE SOCIAL CHANGES 
 
Despite the pace of change, many Blacks found no improvement in their immediate quality of life or standard of living, and dismissed as racist White explanations that it had taken decades, if not centuries, for the White American population to reach the standards it had. Although Black and White racial violence had long been a feature of the civil rights movement, specifically Black riots started in the 1960s. 
 
The first serious disturbances broke out in Cambridge in 1963 and 1964, and the National Guard was called in to restore order. Then in 1965, a particularly severe Black riot erupted in Watts, a Black ghetto in Los Angeles. The Watts riots lasted six days, taking 34 lives and causing $40 million in property damage. 
 
Black riots then spread across more than 30 major American cities, turning almost every major center into a battle zone of White policemen trying to control mobs of Blacks rioting and burning and looting anything they could. It was from these Black riots that the 1960s phrase "Burn, Baby Burn" was developed. From 1964 to 1968, Black riots had killed 215 people and caused $250 million damage. 
 
Kerner Commission: "Separate and Unequal" 
 
Baffled by the Black riots - in theory there should have been less reason to riot than ever before, what with the desegregation laws and pro-non-White discrimination racial quotas having both come into effect - president Johnson appointed a commission, headed by the former governor of Illinois, Otto Kerner, to investigate the causes of Black unrest. 
 
The report of the Kerner Commission, issued in 1968, warned of the increasing racial polarization in the United States and said that the "nation is moving toward two societies, one white, one black - separate and unequal." 
 
No sooner had this warning been made, but a fresh wave of riots broke out in April 1968 when Martin Luther King was assassinated by a White man in Tennessee. Once again federal troops had to be called out to suppress the anarchy. 
 
The Bakke Case PROHIBITS RACIAL QUOTAS 
 
The system of racial quotas for educational and private institutions was struck a serious blow by a 1978 US Supreme Court case. In that case, known as Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the University of California was prohibited from creating racial quotas, but was permitted to consider race as one factor in admissions policies. The Court later ruled that racial preferences by a private corporation designed to remedy prior discrimination did not violate the Civil Rights Act, and it upheld a federal statute that requires a certain percentage of government contracts to be given to non-White businesses. 
 
US CITIES FACE White Flight 
 
Increasing Black urbanization, coupled with its associated problems of an increased crime-rate, increased racial tensions and resultant integrated schools - which in every measured case led to fall in educational standards - created in the 1970s the phenomena of "White flight". Entire neighborhoods of Whites started moving, lock stock and barrel, out of the major American cities into outlying suburbs. In this way many city centers became almost overnight Blacks-only areas: and this, combined with the dropping of any type of voter qualification, meant that by the mid-1970s, a number of these major cities had elected Black mayors and city councils for the first time. 
 
Bussing in Boston FORCES WHITES TO LEAVE 
 
In June 1974, a federal court ruled that the Boston School Committee had deliberately maintained racial segregation in the city's public schools and ordered the implementation of bussing programs to bring children to schools outside their own neighborhoods. This led to serious racial clashes between Black and White pupils and their parents, and in 1975, a new integration program was ordered, which saw a staggering 21,000 pupils of different races bussed all over the city in an attempt to achieve some type of racial balance in the state schools. 
 
This caused a huge number of Whites to leave the inner city areas of Boston, adding to the White flight syndrome already taking form in most other American cities. All-White private schools also then started springing up like mushrooms. 
 
Black Riots Erupt in Los Angeles 
 
One of the worst Black riots in American history took place in Los Angeles in April 1992, after four White policemen were acquitted in the assault of a Black motorist (who had a long criminal record), Rodney King. The assault on King was captured on video - but the policemen were acquitted after the entire video was shown: a 13 second prelude to the assault - which was not widely shown to the public - showed King resisting arrest and assaulting the White police officers. 
 
Blacks in Los Angeles and elsewhere, immediately forming a racial solidarity (which, if done by Whites, would be called "racist") with the victim of the assault, went on the rampage: fifty-eight people died in the rioting, and property damage exceeded $750 million. 
 
CALIFORNIA : Proposition 187 AIMED AT REDUCING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION 
 
By the 1990s, illegal Mexican immigration into California had reached floodgate proportions and was placing a massive strain on that state's resources. In November 1994, California voters approved a law, called Proposition 187, which revoked the rights of illegal immigrants to state education, welfare, and health services. 
 
In November 1995, a U.S. District judge overturned major parts of the proposition, but many of its basic points remained in force. California has always been the focal point for immigration into America: during the 1970s, attempts by that state's educational authorities to enforce racial quotas (which saw non-Whites being given places ahead of better qualified White students purely on the basis of race) on the University of California were overturned by the 1974 Bakke decision. 
 
In July 1995, however, the University of California Board of Regents turned away from previous admissions policies entirely when it passed a resolution eliminating programs that called for pro-non-White discrimination in admissions, hiring, and the granting of outside contracts. 
 
In November 1996, California voters then passed the California Civil Rights Initiative, also known as Proposition 209, which ended any pro-non-White discrimination based on race or ethnicity for jobs, state contracts, or admission to state schools. However, its implementation was prevented by various court challenges 
 
Civil Rights IN REVIEW: A COLOSSAL Failure 
 
In real terms, the decades of civil rights programs have been a failure. Not only have average living standards for all but an elite of Blacks declined, but they have also dropped on every other social indicator. 
 
In 1997, over one million Black American men were in prison, and homicide was the leading cause of death among Black men aged 15 to 34. Nationwide, blacks -- although only 12 per cent of the population -- account for 64 per cent of all violent-crime arrests and 71 per cent of all robbery arrests. ("Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America" Jared Taylor, Carroll & Graf, 1993). 
 
In 1988, there were fewer than ten cases of white-on-black rape -- as opposed to 9,405 cases of black-on-white rape. Taylor reports that black men appear three to four times more likely to commit rape than whites, and more than sixty times more likely to rape a white than a white is likely to rape a black. (Taylor, ibid) 
 
This black crisis still disproportionately hurts whites. Black criminals choose white victims in more than half of their violent crime; the average black criminal seems over 12 times more likely to kill a white than vice versa. 
 
Homicide is now the leading cause of death for black men between 15 and 44; one in four black men in their twenties is either in jail, on probation, or on parole. Syphilis is fifty times more prevalent among blacks than among whites; black children are twice as likely as whites to die in their first year. (Taylor, ibid) 
 
A far greater percentage of Blacks than Whites are officially classed as being below the poverty line; drug addiction and criminality amongst the American Black population is proportionately dramatically higher than it is for any other segment of the American population. 
 
All this has happened despite the USA subsidizing its Black poor, publicly and privately, to the tune of more than $2.5 trillion in federal moneys alone since the 1960s. 
 
The cities run by Black Americans - Washington DC, Detroit and others - are marked by collapse, decay, exceedingly high levels of violent crime, drugs, gang wars and economic decline. The American Dream has for the most part remained beyond the reach of Black America, despite massive help and subsidies to help it along the way. 
 
The words of the 1968 Kerner Report have remained as valid as ever: America is a society of racially separate unequals.

Chapter 68: Ragnarok - The Coming Fall of the West 
 
PART ONE : SOCIAL DISCORDANCES MARK MULTI-RACIAL SOCIETIES 
 
All the great events of history have a racial basis, the very ebb and flow of history is understood only when it is seen that all of history is the result of racial or sub-racial shifts in power, of tribes or nations conquering others, of lands being occupied by different races, and racial conflict. 
 
Once this common thread is understood, then history stops being a meaningless jumble of seemingly unconnected events, but welds into an obviously connected and predictable flow. 
 
With this knowledge, predicting the future on the basis of what is already known, is not that difficult. 
 
This is particularly so in the light of the facts which have been overviewed in the previous chapter: the increasing numbers of non-Whites flooding Europe, North America and Australia will, without any doubt, lead to a change in the nature of the societies on those continents, which in turn will bring about a change in the nature of the civilization on those continents. 
 
That this will happen is without doubt: it is not even a question of debate, it is a simple fact. 
 
What it means in practical terms is that Western European civilization - as it has been developing since the Late Paleolithic Age, some 27,000 years ago, will vanish and change into something else, a hybrid culture like that of present day India. 
 
THE END OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION 
 
This prospect of a hybrid society may appear attractive to some people, although it will not mean the end of the concept of race (instead of sharp racial divisions, there will be a racial "continuum" sliding from light to dark, as is the case in India). 
 
However, there are others who do not think that this is a desirable end result of 30,000 years of history, and who do not relish themselves or their descendants living in countries which are at best Second World, and, as the demographic balance becomes ever more marked, which will slide into Third World status and then beyond. 
 
Already the effects of the change in the make-up of society can be seen everywhere in Europe, North America or Australia, where one cares to look: an overview of these already clear signs of social discordance is the subject of this final chapter. 
 
Belgium and Black Africa 
 
Of particular concern must be the ever growing African numbers in North America and Europe. Black Africa itself is without question the most backward continent on earth; in 1989, a World Bank report on sub-Saharan Africa (that is, excluding the oil rich Arab states and what was then White ruled South Africa) revealed that the Gross Domestic Product for the entire continent was the same as that of one tiny European country, Belgium (Sunday Times, 26 November 1989). 
 
The possibility of this massive poverty and social chaos being transferred to Europe and North America is not a figment of a wild imagination: indeed, the transfer of that population is already underway, as demonstrated in the preceding chapter. 
 
Social Discordance: The Signs of the Dissolution of the West 
 
At the end of the 20th century, there are very clear signs of social discordance at work in the White West: signs which are unmistakably linked to the changing racial make-up of the societies in question. 
 
Before these discordances are overviewed, the reader should realize that of necessity "groups" are being used to define trends and patterns of behavior. This is so because of the nature of racial dynamics: to use a simple example to explain: One White in a meeting hall of 200 Blacks will hardly be noticed; as a lone individual he will not count. However, 150 Whites in a meeting hall with 50 Blacks will not only count, but they will set the agenda of the meeting as well. 
 
In this way then, racial groups impact upon each other, and racial individuals do not. 
 
This is a critical factor to bear in mind when group statistics of any nature are overviewed: the individual exception does not disprove the group rule; small numbers of individuals do not count, but large groups do. 
 
Race and Crime -The USA AND EUROPE COMPARED 
 
One of the most prominent of all social indicators is the crime rate: it serves as a window onto society, reflecting a large number of factors such as social status, poverty, alienation from society and a host of others. 
 
A comparison of European and American criminal statistics reveals some important insights into how this impacts upon the racial make-up of society. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) produces a regular "Uniform Crime Report", published by the US government in Washington, DC.. 
 
In 1992, the figures they produced were first given as a total for America, and then broken down into two racial categories of "Black" and "White". Under the FBI's classification, Mexicans are also classed as White, so separate statistics for this group do not exist. 
 
While this is of course scientifically incorrect, these are nonetheless the only statistics which are publicly available on the matter, and for sake of factual correctness, these figures are used as is in the table below. In addition to this, the European crime statistics for similar crimes have been laid alongside the American statistics for comparison. 
 
Comparison: Crimes per 100,000 Population 
 
 
Britain 
France 
Germany 
Italy 
USA 
American Whites 
American Blacks 
 
Murder 
7.4 
4.6 
4.2 
6.0 
9.3 
5.1 
43.4 
 
Robbery 
62.6 
90.4 
47.4 
68.6 
263.0 
126 
1,343 
 
 
Sources: FBI Uniform Crime Reports for U.S. data, The Economist for European data. European data for 1990; American data for 1992 
 
As the table shows, Americans as a whole are more violent than Europeans: twice as likely as Frenchmen to commit murder and more than five times as likely as Germans to commit robbery. 
 
However, as is clear from the separate calculations for American Blacks and Whites, (done by the FBI themselves) it is the very high rates of violent crimes by Blacks - eight times as high as Whites for murder and more than ten times for robbery - that yield this result. 
 
These figures actually overstate the White crime rate, because of FBI's inclusion of Mexicans into the White category. 
 
These figures have a bearing on the perennial American debate over gun control. White Americans, who have easy access to guns, are less likely to kill each other than are the British, who are almost completely disarmed. 
 
This comparison with Europe proves that Whites in the United States have neither a unique "culture of violence'' nor inadequate gun laws. America has a high rate of violent crime because it has a large number of violent Black criminals. 
 
MURDER RATE IN Brazil 
 
Brazil is a nation of some 170 million, the vast majority of whom are mixed-race slum-dwellers: with a well deserved reputation for violence. In Sao Paulo, its largest city with 16 million people, more than 4,500 people are murdered each year. In March 1998 alone, 771 people were killed, more than all the homicides reported in New York City during 1997. (Reuters, 08/16/98, ''Park Maniac'' killer case rivets Brazil). 
 
Canada - EFFECTS OF IMMIGRATION INVASION 
 
The history of the racial balance in Canada serves as a perfect example of the power of normal, mostly peaceful, immigration to change the face of a land utterly within a few hundred years. Initially the Amerinds occupied the territory now known as Canada: they were however not beaten by force of arms, as were their cousins in the United States of America, but were simply pushed back by successive waves of White immigration. 
 
Within two hundred years the face of Canada changed, along with its culture, heritage and all other manifestations of the previous Amerind settlement - changed irreparably by the shift in the racial make-up in the population. 
 
It is therefore ironic that the process which destroyed Amerind culture in Canada is precisely the same process which, at the end of the 20th century, is busy displacing the White culture and civilization in Canada: successive waves of Black and Asian immigrants (combined with the racially mixed offspring produced by physical integration) are busy changing the face of Canada once again. 
 
Minister of Multi-Culturalism 
 
Canada even has a "minister of state for multiculturalism" formally added to the cabinet as early as 1972. In 1986, an affirmative action employment policy was adopted by the Canadian government through which preference is always given to any non-White applicants above that of any similarly qualified White. 
 
As is the case virtually everywhere in the modern White countries at the end of the 20th century, special allowances and privileges are made for non-White races which are then specifically denied to Whites. In Canada, there are in excess of 600 "regional councils", which look after local Amerind affairs. 
 
However, what makes these councils unique is that only Amerinds can be elected to them, and only Amerinds can vote for them: a super-racial discrimination which is officially endorsed by the Canadian government, who would never dream of organizing Whites only "regional councils" to "look after White interests." 
 
Political Separation GRANTED TO INDIANS 
 
The Canadian government has also given separate political rights to Amerinds: in March 1993, the Cree-Naskapi of Quebec and the Sechelt Band of British Columbia, became formally self-governing with municipal status and accountable to an "indigenous" only electorate. 
 
Once again this sort of blatant racial mobilization would probably be the subject of a criminal prosecution if it was carried out by White Canadians. In 1999, a new treaty created another Amerind state, that of Nunavut in the eastern part of the Northwest Territories. This state, specifically created for Canadian Amerinds, is governed by its own legislative assembly, territorial court, and civil service. 
 
<a href="http://www.white-history.com/hwr68.htm">www.white-history.com/hwr68.htm</a>

you're right. i'm pretty careful with the words i choose, not because most so-called minorities (blacks included) can't take frank language and honest debate about these issues, in my (wide) experience they can and appreciate it; but because the (usually well-off, isolated and privilaged) white limousine liberals and their proxy, minority so-called "actvists" and "community leaders", FREAK when these issues are discussed the way we're discussing them. i'm really not trying to preach to the converted (or preach at all.)

don't know why i bother; it's probably a lost cause.

Grow up and take responsibility for yourself sun shine.

Every Adult knows how to beat a bully and that is to stand up to them. If you can’t do it by yourself then you find and get support from others in your community to put an end to their behavior or they move away. You make a stand!

It is also the same with criminals. Criminals only stay where they are tolerated and they feel in control, what they call respect!

Criminals are cowards they won’t risk their health or freedom and they don’t stay where they can’t control those around them.

That’s a fact! Whether you agree or disagree with it makes no difference.

---
Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.

jesus, i don't know where to begin: do you realize in the united states the out-of-wedlock birth-rate among african-americans as a whole is, at a minimum, an astounding 75% ! in many areas it's well above 80% !! have you ever lived and worked in areas with large black populations? i have and actually grew up in one. it is the NORM for households to be made up of a un-married mother with multiple children (all with different last names to scam the welfare regulations,) by different fathers. i do not in any way exaggerate, this is the absolute god's honest truth on my father's grave. it is quite common to see 14-15 year old pregnant girls. the next time you see on tv an incident where a black thug gets killed, watch closely the (we all know the drill) reporter interviewing the distraught mother or grandmother where she claims he was just turning his life around and just had a baby girl with his girlfriend! look around and see if there are any interviews with his father. good luck. in the united states (i can't speak for canada) social entitlement programs i.e. welfare, and everything from food stamps to public housing projects ALL encourage and perpetuate this pathetic, disfunctional, anti-social lifestyle. a hugely disproportionate amount of crime in the united states (the clear majority in fact) are perpetrated by youngmen from this kind of background. around 80% of the prison population in the united states is black or latino (but blacks make up a grossly disproportionate amount.) 80%! why? not because they're picked on, but because they COMMIT a huge amount of crime! what is soo fucking hard for some people to understand about this? go live in these neighborhoods or send your children to school there. you won't be on your high horse after six months let alone one year.

there's a situation going on where i live right now where hispanic immigrant building custodians (mostly central american)who work hard late into the evening at downtown highrise buildings are being systimatically jumped, beaten and robbed while going to catch the subway home in the evening. it's a daily occurance now but unless you were on intimate terms with some of them you wouldn't know; it goes un-reported in the local media. the custodians are pissed but even though they have only been in america for a short time, even they know what's going on: the muggers are roaming gangs of young black men and the pussified media and city leadership don't know how to handle the situation in the correct pc manner. mean while it continues. a middle-aged woman was beaten and robbed the other night and she's had to quite her job out of pure fear. i'm soo bullshit i'm getting incoherent! can't write anymore!