Désolé Delwin mais le Canada n'est pas mon pays.
This entire thread is giving me a headache.
Yet I'm curious to read because it's bloody hilarious watching you guys throw insults around at each other all day long.
Everyone has made their point I think. Stop going over old ground.
Agree to disagree. Try as you all might, Separatists and Federalists are never EVER going to see the other side of the coin. It's a lost cause.
But it's funny to read.
Jack Layton: I hate his way of speech, he pulled out a few good points but most of the debate was the same old, "you have a third choice, one that knows what you want etc.... vote more NDP into the house" I understand he is trying to get seats but anyone that listens to that and votes for him because of that is truly simple minded. I found it anoying and very not productive. Although he did show that in various points he understands that people are important too, but the fact is some coorperate tax cuts must happen. Attacked both libs and cons.
Harper: Had some good points, clearly outlined his plan, but not costs and numbers. Plus I never knew that 30% of Canadians make less the 8000 dollars, unless Harper is counting children as well I'm quite sure his numbers are wrong. He also try and fight the nationalism battle and lost terribly to Martin.
Martin: Well outlined a few plans, I found him enthusiastic, and I find given the chance he may be able to do something, nothing has really been done with the minority government due to the fact that it is a minority government. Shut down Harper on nationalism issue. Once again lacked numbers, makes promises yet I would like to see results. In the debate I noticed that he was getting agree with the debate, and I find it was due to the fact that it was a very childish and stupidly going debate, parties concentrated more on attacks then policies. I personally have enough of thew Liberals did the scandal and so on, we know now what do you plan to do to fix it and makesure that it does not happen again.(Harper was probably the only one who proposed anything on that, the accountability act, I'm not sure whether its good or bad)
Duceppe: Not super with english but I found that he understood the questions that were asked not like Harper in french(mainly in the december debate) Found that effectivly showed his position and also showed a good plan of what the leader should do, I find he would make the best leader if not a seperatist, displays most leader like behavior. Was able to provide numbers in various sectors, seemed most intelligent and although not as enthusiastic as Martin, probably made second, I found Harper came last in that sector, although he was pretty calm he looked stiff and his smile was very "evil" shall I say.
Overall in the debate I found Duceppe proved to be the best debator.
*mutters something about the disingenuous conflation of "nation" and "country"*
Everyone knows that as is, Quebec is not a country. But all the qualities that make the Metis a nation, Quebec possesses. Quebec is a nation.
Martin won...he is retired.
Martin won...he is retired.
Martin won...he is retired.