Canada Kicks Ass
BC Parents Will Have to Lie to Keep Kids out of Gay Advocacy

REPLY

Previous  1 ... 3  4  5  6  7  8  9 ... 28  Next



Clogeroo @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:42 am

$1:
So, what do you folks say? Any readers out there who have considered changing sexual orientation because of shifts in societal attitudes? Or do you feel exactly the same now as ever?

I have never done it nor would desire too I don't think I ever found a man attractive.

There are cases though it seems people have. You have instances where someone is married has children and can be together for years then they will become a homosexual or desire to be with the same sex. Unless they were always homosexuals but how could you go through a marriage and children if you were? That’s why research is sketchy because not everyone responds like a woman does to males or not every female responds to females because some actually do not.

I think some got that way from either A) Psychological and mental reasons B) Genetic dysfunction or hormonal imbalance C) Maybe a little of both. If it is part of genetics or their hormones then like anything it probably will be able to be corrected in time. But that’s the part of homosexuals that is odd unlike other people with diseases or disabilities that are trying to find a cure they are not. When people run for cancer they are not taking part to show off or say we have cancer accept us! They are running because they want to find a cure. Much like people with aids they want a cure for it. But homosexuals seem to not want a cure they would rather live in denial that they have a problem.

But I think many are not “real” homosexuals or born that way. They are going along with it or choosing to be part of that social group. Why do some homosexual men talk in that high squeaky voice? Or why do some dress in clothes made for the opposite gender? I think some are like transgender people they are choosing to switch sides for social and mental reasons. I think homosexuals are for the most part just trying to find excuses for the way they are rather than trying to find a way around their problem. The first step is admitting it and we are doing them no favours by encouraging it.

   



Zipperfish @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:48 am

Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
So, what do you folks say? Any readers out there who have considered changing sexual orientation because of shifts in societal attitudes? Or do you feel exactly the same now as ever?

I have never done it nor would desire too I don't think I ever found a man attractive.

There are cases though it seems people have. You have instances where someone is married has children and can be together for years then they will become a homosexual or desire to be with the same sex. Unless they were always homosexuals but how could you go through a marriage and children if you were? That’s why research is sketchy because not everyone responds like a woman does to males or not every female responds to females because some actually do not.

I think some got that way from either A) Psychological and mental reasons B) Genetic dysfunction or hormonal imbalance C) Maybe a little of both. If it is part of genetics or their hormones then like anything it probably will be able to be corrected in time. But that’s the part of homosexuals that is odd unlike other people with diseases or disabilities that are trying to find a cure they are not. When people run for cancer they are not taking part to show off or say we have cancer accept us! They are running because they want to find a cure. Much like people with aids they want a cure for it. But homosexuals seem to not want a cure they would rather live in denial that they have a problem.

But I think many are not “real” homosexuals or born that way. They are going along with it or choosing to be part of that social group. Why do some homosexual men talk in that high squeaky voice? Or why do some dress in clothes made for the opposite gender? I think some are like transgender people they are choosing to switch sides for social and mental reasons. I think homosexuals are for the most part just trying to find excuses for the way they are rather than trying to find a way around their problem. The first step is admitting it and we are doing them no favours by encouraging it.


Boy, you've sure put a lot of thought into this...

   



SireJoe @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:01 am

lol WOW now your comparing homosexuality to CANCER. I think you MIGHT have a bias on this one kiddo. Dont think you even have a clue what your talking about.

As for your father with children in a marriage for X amount of years..... Is it really that hard to understand?? Gay couples, not to long ago, were considered disgusting and many a times killed of the very fact of being gay. Gay couples could NOT adopt kids. Gay couples could NOT (and still cannot in many places) get married. So it begs the question, how does a man or woman, who wants a family, who wants children and who does not want to be crucified for who he/she is get all that they desires?

THEY LIVE A LIE. They marry a man or woman like there family wants, they get the kids they always wanted and no one has to know thier deep dark secret. Until of course everything just seems waaay to wrong to them, they can no longer lie to themselves, to thier family and friends and they must be who they truly are inside. This isnt some homosexual TRICK that the gay community put a spell of the person to make them gay all of a sudden. There aint no black magic about it.

You have no idea what your talking about and are making up shit to suit your uncomfortable nature on this issue. Time to put down the bible, open up your mind and REALIZE that not all men and women are created the same. Homosexuality has been around forever, just becuase now it is no longer locked in a closet and not considered the taboo it once was does not mean that has changed.

Oh and you might want to stay off the same sites hwacker uses for information, they have a SLIGHT bias towards these issues.

   



BartSimpson @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:14 am

Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
I think it's fine for BC. In fact, I would strongly encourage all Leftists to raise their children to be queer positive. As much as you can encourage them to engage in anything but heterosexual activity, that means it's much less likely that Leftists will be able to breed and spread their ridiculous notions among a future generation. Eventually, we can just breed out Leftism from the human population.


You are the Master of Great Ideas, aren't you? R=UP

   



DerbyX @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:20 am

BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
I think it's fine for BC. In fact, I would strongly encourage all Leftists to raise their children to be queer positive. As much as you can encourage them to engage in anything but heterosexual activity, that means it's much less likely that Leftists will be able to breed and spread their ridiculous notions among a future generation. Eventually, we can just breed out Leftism from the human population.


You are the Master of Great Ideas, aren't you? R=UP


I sincerely hope you aren't agreeing with that fuckwit and his unbelievably bigotted statement.

Imagine, parents teaching their children tolerance.

What a terrible thing indeed. :roll:

   



hwacker @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:29 am

SireJoe SireJoe:
Oh and you might want to stay off the same sites hwacker uses for information, they have a SLIGHT bias towards these issues.



How about the ones you frequent, lets post some of them shall we.


Google cache won't go away.

   



Clogeroo @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:52 am

$1:
lol WOW now your comparing homosexuality to CANCER. I think you MIGHT have a bias on this one kiddo. Dont think you even have a clue what your talking about.

And you do? What makes you so qualified? You are also picking at what I say and changing its meaning so I wouldn't be the one calling someone else biased.

I said homosexuality isn't normal the human anatomy is designed for opposite sexes like most mammals are you can't argue against that. I don't think that matters if I have a religion or not science even makes it quite clear that the penis goes in the vagina for that is how we work.

Also if people can have shame marriages and false children and have a heterosexual relationship when they really they "are not" then people could have a shame marriage and a homosexual relationship even if they are not too can't they?

Even if people are born homosexuals which you seem so sure of even though the evidence is disputed why can't we find a way to correct their disability? If I was paralyzed and someone could make me walk again Id do it. Most people who suffer from a disability would like a cure for it but many homosexuals don't which brings up the mental part of their condition. Why would people want to live with a disability? It doesn't seem very logical unless they really don't have one or could be choosing to be the way they are. Either way there is no clear evidence on anything about homosexuals thats why I think it should be left out of the school system. Chances are it would be some biased approach to it and by forcing people to learn that is just wrong and takes all meaning out of a democratic society.

   



DerbyX @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:18 am

$1:
And you do? What makes you so qualified? You are also picking at what I say and changing its meaning so I wouldn't be the one calling someone else biased.


What makes you qualified. Did you study biology? Genetics? Sociology?

$1:
I said homosexuality isn't normal the human anatomy is designed for opposite sexes like most mammals are you can't argue against that.


Human anatomy evolved sexual reproduction as a means of propagation. We evolved lungs to facillitate gas exchange. All of our organs evolved performing one function or another. We weren't designed with any forethought.

You have no real point here because people aren't engaging in anal sex for procreation or 99.9% of all vaginal intercourse.

$1:
I don't think that matters if I have a religion or not science even makes it quite clear that the penis goes in the vagina for that is how we work.


Correction, that is how procreation occurs. It can occur even if the penis doesn't enter the vagina. It can occur in a test tube first.

The penis can go in the vagina, the ass, or the mouth. It can be rubbed by hands and against just about anything. It can be covered in chocolate. All of these can occur between a man and a women involved in a hetero relationship.

All are examples of how sex can work.

BTW, homosexual acts between animals has been well documented.

Don't compare sexual intercourse for procreation with sexual intercourse for pleasure.

$1:
Also if people can have shame marriages and false children and have a heterosexual relationship when they really they "are not" then people could have a shame marriage and a homosexual relationship even if they are not too can't they?


Irrelevant.

"False children?" What exactly are false children?

$1:
Even if people are born homosexuals which you seem so sure of even though the evidence is disputed why can't we find a way to correct their disability?


Studied it have you? No you haven't. If you did you would know that there are genetic and fetal enviornment factors indicating just that.

BTW, its not a disability and its offensive to think that.

$1:
Most people who suffer from a disability would like a cure for it but many homosexuals don't which brings up the mental part of their condition. Why would people want to live with a disability?


:roll: You just get more ignorant as time goes by don't you.

First you dismiss any physiological link to homosexuality which means it must be psycologically linked. Then you completely ignore the reality that they are choosing to be homosexual (not counting the fact that most are born that way) abd wonder why they want to be cured.

Your ignorance is a disability. It obviously inhibits your ability to think and show tolerance. Perhaps you should be looking for a cure yourself.

It never occured to you that homosexuality may simply be a trait of humanity no different the hair colour or eye colour?

It never occured to you that it may be completely normal and the only evidence against that is the intolerance exhibited by humans like yourself.

   



hwacker @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:31 am

DerbyX DerbyX:
We evolved lungs to facillitate gas exchange


Here we go, Darwin’s theory of horseshit coming right up.

   



BartSimpson @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:34 am

DerbyX DerbyX:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
I think it's fine for BC. In fact, I would strongly encourage all Leftists to raise their children to be queer positive. As much as you can encourage them to engage in anything but heterosexual activity, that means it's much less likely that Leftists will be able to breed and spread their ridiculous notions among a future generation. Eventually, we can just breed out Leftism from the human population.


You are the Master of Great Ideas, aren't you? R=UP


I sincerely hope you aren't agreeing with that fuckwit and his unbelievably bigotted statement.

Imagine, parents teaching their children tolerance.

What a terrible thing indeed. :roll:


Let's put your tolerance to the test, shall we?

Since you want children to be tolerant of homosexuals and muslims then should they also be taught tolerance of...

Polygamist Mormons?

Holocaust deniers?

Holocaust revisionists?

Conservatives?

Libertarians?

Americans?

Fascists?

Communists?

Anachists?

Gun owners?

Gothic vampire freaks?

Bigots?

Racists?

Racial separatists?

Christians?

Jews?

Israelis?

Hmmm?

   



Zipperfish @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:36 am

Clogeroo Clogeroo:
...science even makes it quite clear that the penis goes in the vagina for that is how we work.



How sad--you've never gotten a blowjob. You should try it. It's not great for procreating but it might loosen you up a bit.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

   



DerbyX @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:41 am

BartSimpson BartSimpson:
DerbyX DerbyX:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
I think it's fine for BC. In fact, I would strongly encourage all Leftists to raise their children to be queer positive. As much as you can encourage them to engage in anything but heterosexual activity, that means it's much less likely that Leftists will be able to breed and spread their ridiculous notions among a future generation. Eventually, we can just breed out Leftism from the human population.


You are the Master of Great Ideas, aren't you? R=UP


I sincerely hope you aren't agreeing with that fuckwit and his unbelievably bigotted statement.

Imagine, parents teaching their children tolerance.

What a terrible thing indeed. :roll:


Let's put your tolerance to the test, shall we?

Since you want children to be tolerant of homosexuals and muslims then should they also be taught tolerance of...

Polygamist Mormons?

Holocaust deniers?

Holocaust revisionists?

Conservatives?

Libertarians?

Americans?

Fascists?

Communists?

Anachists?

Gun owners?

Gothic vampire freaks?

Bigots?

Racists?

Racial separatists?

Christians?

Jews?

Israelis?

Hmmm?


Yes. Tolerance doesn't mean they have to agree with the person or do what that person does.

All it means is they should accept that people are different and that its not OK to hate and discriminate for no other reason then what a person is or believes.

Why is it that so much of the worst intolerance on this site is held by users claiming to follow a "religion of tolerance".

Perhaps because it isn't a religion of tolerance though some of its users may be tolerant people.

(sound familiar?)

   



DerbyX @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:42 am

Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
...science even makes it quite clear that the penis goes in the vagina for that is how we work.



How sad--you've never gotten a blowjob. You should try it. It's not great for procreating but it might loosen you up a bit.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Should he give or receive?? :lol:

   



BartSimpson @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:57 am

DerbyX DerbyX:
Yes. Tolerance doesn't mean they have to agree with the person or do what that person does.


Yet you evidence very little tolerance for Christians. You do tend to rail against Christians as if we all have some sort of conspiracy to force you to conform.

DerbyX DerbyX:
All it means is they should accept that people are different and that its not OK to hate and discriminate for no other reason then what a person is or believes.


Then what about so many of your own virulent anti-Christian statements?

DerbyX DerbyX:
Why is it that so much of the worst intolerance on this site is held by users claiming to follow a "religion of tolerance".


I agree. Liberal intolerance is, indeed, a religious dogma.

DerbyX DerbyX:
Perhaps because it isn't a religion of tolerance though some of its users may be tolerant people.

(sound familiar?)


Some liberals actually are tolerant.















of people they like.

   



SireJoe @ Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:12 am

Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
lol WOW now your comparing homosexuality to CANCER. I think you MIGHT have a bias on this one kiddo. Dont think you even have a clue what your talking about.

And you do? What makes you so qualified? You are also picking at what I say and changing its meaning so I wouldn't be the one calling someone else biased.

I said homosexuality isn't normal the human anatomy is designed for opposite sexes like most mammals are you can't argue against that. I don't think that matters if I have a religion or not science even makes it quite clear that the penis goes in the vagina for that is how we work.

Also if people can have shame marriages and false children and have a heterosexual relationship when they really they "are not" then people could have a shame marriage and a homosexual relationship even if they are not too can't they?

Even if people are born homosexuals which you seem so sure of even though the evidence is disputed why can't we find a way to correct their disability? If I was paralyzed and someone could make me walk again Id do it. Most people who suffer from a disability would like a cure for it but many homosexuals don't which brings up the mental part of their condition. Why would people want to live with a disability? It doesn't seem very logical unless they really don't have one or could be choosing to be the way they are. Either way there is no clear evidence on anything about homosexuals thats why I think it should be left out of the school system. Chances are it would be some biased approach to it and by forcing people to learn that is just wrong and takes all meaning out of a democratic society.



But thats just it. Its YOUR view that says that homosexuality is a disease. A disability that needs changing. In my view, it is the complete opposite. It is a part of humanity, a part of who we are. Its all a part of the human evolution. So why in the HELL would someone want to "fix" something that is not broken? Simply becuase of your hatred or intolerance of difference in society is not a good enough reason for people to fundamentaly change who they are. People are not here to suit your narrow view of who we are all supposed to be. Sorry, but thats the cold hard facts. Its time to grow up a bit and realize that you cannot control everything in your surroundings.


People differ. Deal with it.

   



REPLY

Previous  1 ... 3  4  5  6  7  8  9 ... 28  Next