2 differents lost of USA in WAR.
One of my favorites Democratic illusions; Kennedy was really a peace-nick and wanted America out of that war, and that's why the evil war-mongering Republicans had him killed.
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
What was there to negotiate? The US wanted to leave, the vietnamese wanted the US to leave.
No, the
North Vietnamese wanted us to leave South Vietnam and after promising peace they invaded as soon as we were gone.
All the vietnamese wanted us to leave, the south vietnamese may not have wanted northern rule but nor did they want to be under the thumb of some US installed fascist dictator like the US did to Chile a few years later.
The vietnamese more then anything else wanted to be independent of foreign rule, its why they fought the French, its why they fought the Americans, and its why they fought China. Anyone who thought that vietnam was taking orders from moscow, or beijing was a fool of themselves, the vietnamese only tolerated them so long as it helped them keep their country independent of colonial rule.
That
exact same motivation, this time the fear of Chinese occupation, is what has pushed the US approval rating up in recent years.
$1:
Truthfully, we abandoned South Vietnam to political expediency. That whole country was enslaved under Communism because fuckwits helped the Communists. Utter fuckwits.
You should watch the movie "Fog of War" if you want to know the real reason we lost.
ridenrain ridenrain:
One of my favorites Democratic illusions; Kennedy was really a peace-nick and wanted America out of that war, and that's why the evil war-mongering Republicans had him killed.
Uh-huh.
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
What was there to negotiate? The US wanted to leave, the vietnamese wanted the US to leave.
No, the
North Vietnamese wanted us to leave South Vietnam and after promising peace they invaded as soon as we were gone.
All the vietnamese wanted us to leave, the south vietnamese may not have wanted northern rule but nor did they want to be under the thumb of some US installed fascist dictator like the US did to Chile a few years later.
The vietnamese more then anything else wanted to be independent of foreign rule, its why they fought the French, its why they fought the Americans, and its why they fought China. Anyone who thought that vietnam was taking orders from moscow, or beijing was a fool of themselves, the vietnamese only tolerated them so long as it helped them keep their country independent of colonial rule.
That
exact same motivation, this time the fear of Chinese occupation, is what has pushed the US approval rating up in recent years.
$1:
Truthfully, we abandoned South Vietnam to political expediency. That whole country was enslaved under Communism because fuckwits helped the Communists. Utter fuckwits.
You should watch the movie "Fog of War" if you want to know the real reason we lost.
The Vietnamese hated America. Right. That's why there's 80,000 of them here in Sacramento all flying the US and South Vietnamese flags and any of those people will happily hand you your head if you defend Communism. The press did not report it, but about 40,000 of them marched on the California capitol when the VC president spoke to the Commies in the California Legislature last month.
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The Vietnamese hated America. Right. That's why there's 80,000 of them here in Sacramento all flying the US and South Vietnamese flags and any of those people will happily hand you your head if you defend Communism. The press did not report it, but about 40,000 of them marched on the California capitol when the VC president spoke to the Commies in the California Legislature last month.
I'm sure when the US troops forced them into relocation camps, torched their villages, dumped agent orange on them, shot civilians in free fire zones, and subjected them to corrupt dictators that they absolutely
loved the americans for it
Why is nationalism so hard for you to understand, you are after all highly nationalistic, imagine your reaction if a harsh muslim dictator took power of the midwest by having his troops assault anyone who voted against him, who preceded to have his police roam through the streets assualting christians, while he instituted a strict interpretation of sharia through his support from the middle east.
And when he was finally assaulted just exactly how would you react to the Saudi forces which came to forcibly occupy the mid-west, who using vicious chemical weapons and free fire zones, killed millions of civilians all the while burning towns, and throwing the inhabitants into relocation camps. And you just might have an idea of why the Vietnamese
really didn't like the US.
And before you begin your criticism of my example, remember all you need to do is to switch muslim, for catholic, christian, for buddhist, Saudi-Arabia for US, and Midwest for Vietnam.
Oh and I almost forgot, as far as North Vietnam invading South Vietnam inviolation of the treaty, the two were supposed to be unified and have elections
back in 56 but that was stopped by the US backed Diem.
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The Vietnamese hated America. Right. That's why there's 80,000 of them here in Sacramento all flying the US and South Vietnamese flags and any of those people will happily hand you your head if you defend Communism. The press did not report it, but about 40,000 of them marched on the California capitol when the VC president spoke to the Commies in the California Legislature last month.
I'm sure when the US troops forced them into relocation camps, torched their villages, dumped agent orange on them, shot civilians in free fire zones, and subjected them to corrupt dictators that they absolutely
loved the americans for itWhy is nationalism so hard for you to understand, you are after all highly nationalistic, imagine your reaction if a harsh muslim dictator took power of the midwest by having his troops assault anyone who voted against him, who preceded to have his police roam through the streets assualting christians, while he instituted a strict interpretation of sharia through his support from the middle east.
And when he was finally assaulted just exactly how would you react to the Saudi forces which came to forcibly occupy the mid-west, who using vicious chemical weapons and free fire zones, killed millions of civilians all the while burning towns, and throwing the inhabitants into relocation camps. And you just might have an idea of why the Vietnamese
really didn't like the US.
And before you begin your criticism of my example, remember all you need to do is to switch muslim, for catholic, christian, for buddhist, Saudi-Arabia for US, and Midwest for Vietnam.
I think you listened to John Kerry's bullshit to much about Ghengis Khan and the free fire zones.
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The Vietnamese hated America. Right. That's why there's 80,000 of them here in Sacramento all flying the US and South Vietnamese flags and any of those people will happily hand you your head if you defend Communism. The press did not report it, but about 40,000 of them marched on the California capitol when the VC president spoke to the Commies in the California Legislature last month.
I'm sure when the US troops forced them into relocation camps, torched their villages, dumped agent orange on them, shot civilians in free fire zones, and subjected them to corrupt dictators that they absolutely
loved the americans for itThey hated us. That's why they were all so happy to see us leave and that they all happily stayed in the Workers Paradise created by Uncle Ho. Yes, the whole exodus after the invasion never happened...in your world.
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
Why is nationalism so hard for you to understand,
Why is linear logic so hard for you to understand?
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
you are after all highly nationalistic, imagine your reaction if a harsh muslim dictator took power of the midwest by having his troops assault anyone who voted against him, who preceded to have his police roam through the streets assualting christians, while he instituted a strict interpretation of sharia through his support from the middle east.
You mean like what the Muslims want to do in Ontario?
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
And when he was finally assaulted just exactly how would you react to the Saudi forces which came to forcibly occupy the mid-west, who using vicious chemical weapons and free fire zones, killed millions of civilians all the while burning towns, and throwing the inhabitants into relocation camps. And you just might have an idea of why the Vietnamese really didn't like the US.
And that's why so many of them died trying to reach the USA after the invasion - they were out for revenge by becoming productive American citizens.
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
[
And before you begin your criticism of my example,
Oops, too late.
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
remember all you need to do is to switch muslim, for catholic, christian, for buddhist, Saudi-Arabia for US, and Midwest for Vietnam.
WTF?
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
Oh and I almost forgot, as far as North Vietnam invading South Vietnam inviolation of the treaty, the two were supposed to be unified and have elections back in 56 but that was stopped by the FRENCH backed Diem.
We were not in Indochina in 1956. France was.
Like it or not, a fairly recent thread on this site quoted a survey that showed more people in Vietnam approve of America than any other country in the world.
They freaking love us. Even their freaking
Commies love us.
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The Vietnamese hated America. Right. That's why there's 80,000 of them here in Sacramento all flying the US and South Vietnamese flags and any of those people will happily hand you your head if you defend Communism. The press did not report it, but about 40,000 of them marched on the California capitol when the VC president spoke to the Commies in the California Legislature last month.
I'm sure when the US troops forced them into relocation camps, torched their villages, dumped agent orange on them, shot civilians in free fire zones, and subjected them to corrupt dictators that they absolutely
loved the americans for itThey hated us. That's why they were all so happy to see us leave and that they all happily stayed in the Workers Paradise created by Uncle Ho. Yes, the whole exodus after the invasion never happened...in your world.
Oh gee it couldn't have been that the US effectively salted the earth for generations to come? That the US has massacred millions of civilians in the war and ensured that those who did remain would starve if they didn't succombe to the chemicals we left there. Anyone who could would go
anywhere after what we did to their country.
$1:
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
you are after all highly nationalistic, imagine your reaction if a harsh muslim dictator took power of the midwest by having his troops assault anyone who voted against him, who preceded to have his police roam through the streets assualting christians, while he instituted a strict interpretation of sharia through his support from the middle east.
You mean like what the Muslims want to do in Ontario?
Learn some history this will barely scratch the surface of what the US supported in Vietnam...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duong_Van_Minh$1:
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
And when he was finally assaulted just exactly how would you react to the Saudi forces which came to forcibly occupy the mid-west, who using vicious chemical weapons and free fire zones, killed millions of civilians all the while burning towns, and throwing the inhabitants into relocation camps. And you just might have an idea of why the Vietnamese really didn't like the US.
And that's why so many of them died trying to reach the USA after the invasion - they were out for revenge by becoming productive American citizens.
They were to the point where they would
light themselves on fire to call attention to just what the US was doing to them for no other reason then that they were buddhist and of a different skin color the US looked the other way.
$1:
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
Oh and I almost forgot, as far as North Vietnam invading South Vietnam inviolation of the treaty, the two were supposed to be unified and have elections back in 56 but that was stopped by the US backed Diem.
We were not in Indochina in 1956. France was.
The French war was funded almost exclusively by the US. Further more they
withdrew in 54, So no, france wasn't in vietnam in 56, they learned their lesson about engaging in a land war in asia.
$1:
Like it or not, a fairly recent thread on this site quoted a survey that showed more people in Vietnam approve of America than any other country in the world.
What did I just say about the Vietnamese culture? Could it have been that they value their independence over all else? Could it be that we're seen as the only bulwark against the PLA, and thus its the only reason we are liked? Could it be that I was refering to those very poll figues?
The US ruined vietnam, and your bastardization and revisionism is an insult to the millions of civilians who died horrible deaths.
I'm done with this, I am not going to waste my time arguing with a bigot such as yourself.
TD curses like a sailor when he gets into it! 
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
OneNationUnderGod OneNationUnderGod:
Why do Canadians insist they "won" the War of 1812?
And for the people who insist how did you win?
All offensive attacks made by the US failed, but the war as a whole was basically a stalemate.
True, since the british offensives failed as well, the whole burning of washington was a diversionary tactic, for the forces which were to sweep into the US from New Orleans and Canada... But of course the battle of New Orleans and the Battles in New York both went thoroughly in the favor of the US, thus ending the british hopes for a victory.
Not to mention the US burning of the Parliament in York was a far greater success, since cannons were among the royalties of war, while all the british soldiers in washington got were trinkets.
A stalemate? Nonsense. The American objective was to invade and conquer Canada. They failed. The Canadian objective (or what was Canada at the time) was to protect their lands from being conquered. They succeeded.
Agreed. The Americans did have auxiliary objectives (some were geopolitical) but their primary objective was certainly rebuffed by British Regulars, Canadian militia and Amerindian warriors. Besides, British North America certainly achieved its war aims.
Tman1 @ Tue Oct 04, 2005 4:25 pm
Canada's part in the war was a huge success (obviously) over the U.S and in that was a Canadian/British victory. Second stage of the war between Britian/U.S was a stalemate with the U.S actually winning consessions but British to tired after the Napoleonic wars to care. Both invasions failed.
1st part of war = Victory
2nd part = stalemate..... you decide.
Tman1 Tman1:
Canada's part in the war was a huge success (obviously) over the U.S and in that was a Canadian/British victory. Second stage of the war between Britian/U.S was a stalemate with the U.S actually winning consessions but British to tired after the Napoleonic wars to care. Both invasions failed.
1st part of war = Victory
2nd part = stalemate..... you decide.
Care to try that war again big fella? Yeah, I thought so.
Tman1 @ Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:42 pm
American American:
Tman1 Tman1:
Canada's part in the war was a huge success (obviously) over the U.S and in that was a Canadian/British victory. Second stage of the war between Britian/U.S was a stalemate with the U.S actually winning consessions but British to tired after the Napoleonic wars to care. Both invasions failed.
1st part of war = Victory
2nd part = stalemate..... you decide.
Care to try that war again big fella? Yeah, I thought so.
You thought so what?